Preview

The West Wing: Compromise And Political Idealism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The West Wing: Compromise And Political Idealism
Debating Ayn Rand in the West Wing: Compromise and Political Idealism In the acclaimed 2000s TV show “The West Wing,” which fictionalizes the daily battles of American politics, senior staff members in the White House scatter from issue to issue, disaster to victory, and most often, from meeting to meeting, where the staff negotiates and renegotiates their political strategy. Trumpeting idealist and liberal American values, “The West Wing,” written by Aaron Sorkin, also underscored the necessity of compromise, with White House Chief of Staff Leo McGarry remarking that “Compromise is statesmanship.” However, it is this trafficking of compromise, and all its murky implications, that is most often criticized in modern American politics. Political

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As time passed the rapidly changing society in the nineteenth century, in 1820 the north and south began to have serious conflicting problems that were proved unfixable by compromise. During this time, the north underwent major social, economic, and industrial changes known as the Antebellum Period. While the south generally clung to king cotton and slavery and thus remained essentially the same. This arose a manifold of controversies with how issues such as tariffs, slavery, and land should be handled. Both the Union and the Confederacy tried to create compromises to resolve these problems, yet both sides were never completely satisfied no matter how hard they tried. This made it very close to impossible for them to completely put their differences at ease.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this article, Jeb Bush says he wants more civility in our government and reinforce its presence as a world leader at the Mackinac Republican Leadership Conference. During this conference Bush wanted to create a contrast between him and Donald Trump by not only calling for greater civility in our government but also in life. This article was not useful for my essay because our prompt was not to compare and contrast the candidates but rather the media that portrays the candidates.…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mayhew's third question addresses whether the "tug of war" between a president and congress from divided parties actually undermines law implementation, agency functioning, and program administration. The fact that there has been more micro-management in government is not necessarily a result of divided party control, but rather a public distrust of government like that of Watergate.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Compromise of 1787 or the Connecticut Compromise of 1787 refers to the settlement of the dispute that rose due to conflicting views put forward by the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. These plans proposed changes in the Articles of Confederation that was the aim of the Philadelphia Convention of 1787. However, whereas the Virginia Plan seemed to provide a greater representation of the more populous states in the national government, the New Jersey Plan was proposed by the smaller states aimed at preventing the balance of the US government from tilting in favor of the more populous states as per the Virginia Plan.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Neo Conservatism

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In a world in a fight against, good and evil, right and wrong, anarchy and hegemony, finding common grounds between liberals, neo- conservatism, social constructivism and realism seems infeasible. Finding an all- encompassing response to a zombie invasion can seem inauspicious, each perspective offers different viable answers, but I believe that neo- conservatism offers the most exhaustive approach to a zombie invasion.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Father's views on government were influenced by both the classical republican and the natural rights philosophers. The two groups of philosophers held very different views on how a government should run. The classical republicans believed that the individual should sacrifice his or her personal freedoms in order to gain the greater good. The natural rights philosophers, on the other hand, held that a person's individual freedoms out to be preserved at all costs. The two greatest examples of historical precedent in republican government were the ancient Greek and Roman civilizations, which both gave the people a great deal of power in the government by allowing them a voice. The natural rights philosophers favored the Greeks, while most classical republicans admired the Romans.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the nation’s history, America’s national government began to grow in power. This resulted in much opposition. The Whiskey Rebellion of 1794 and the Nullification Crisis of 1832 are both examples of this.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eddins, Geri Z. “Choosing Sides: The Rise of Party Politics.” Our White House. National Endowment for the Humanities, 2008. Web. 23 Nov. 2012.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Reconstructive Obama

    • 4306 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Bibliography: Crotty, William. “Policy and Politics: The Bush Administration and the 2008 Presidential Election.” Northeastern Political Science Association 41.3 (2009).…

    • 4306 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though Gutmann and Thompson state compromise is needed in the democratic process their own words say the opposite. Their statements, “also made concessions that flew in the face of their most principled reasons”, and “---often distorting them in the process” show how the system of compromise is flawed. If the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and Affordable Care Act of 2010 had merit in themselves and were good for the citizens why are concessions and distortions needed and considered part of the democratic…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    compromise and conflict

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1 Wife of Bath sees marriage as a means for her to have sex and she has a strong sexual appetite. She feels that God gave women sexual desires and that it can't be wrong to give in to those desires because they are God-given. Furthermore, she says that she knows men also have strong sexual desires so she uses sex, or the lack of it, to control her husbands The Wife of Bath begins the Prologue to her tale by establishing herself as an authority on marriage, due to her extensive personal experience with the institution. Since her first marriage at the tender age of twelve, she has had five husbands. She says that many people have criticized her for her numerous marriages, most of them on the basis that Christ went only once to a wedding, at Cana in Galilee. The Wife of Bath has her own views of Scripture and God’s plan. She says that men can only guess and interpret what Jesus meant when he told a Samaritan woman that her fifth husband was not her husband. With or without this bit of Scripture, no man has ever been able to give her an exact reply when she asks to know how many husbands a woman may have in her lifetime. God bade us to wax fruitful and multiply, she says, and that is the text that she wholeheartedly endorses. After all, great Old Testament figures, like Abraham, Jacob, and Solomon, enjoyed multiple wives at once. She uses this power as an “instrument” to control her husbands.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Great Compromise

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Great Compromise was the solution to struggle of representation in the Legislative Branch during the U.S Constitutional Convention in 1787. The states with bigger populations like Virginia favored the Virginia Plan. The Virginia Plan called for representation based on the amount of people living in each state. Larger states favored this plan because they would have more power in making laws. On the other hand, smaller states like Delaware favored the New Jersey Plan, under which each state would send the same amount of representatives to Congress. Smaller states favored this because it meant equal power for everyone. This problem was solved by Roger Sherman. He proposed a bicameral legislature. Each state, as suggested by Sherman, would send an equal amount of Representatives to the House of Senate, and one representative for every 30,000 citizens to the House of Representatives. Today, the variable number of members of the House of Representatives is based on the State’s population as reported in the most recent decennial census. The process of determining the number of members of the House from each state is known as apportionment. Apportionment is the process of allocating the 435 House seats among the states according to each state’s population.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The twentieth century, the political and social events that unfolded in this modern era, and America’s involvement in such affairs, both domestic and foreign, brought about a significant shift in the balance of power within U.S politics. Notwithstanding the framers original design of a distinct system of checks and balances that called even for a bicameral legislature so as to further restrict the power of the legislative, the executive branch has nevertheless expanded exponentially its reach and influence in government. The growth of the presidency and its overarching presence over the judiciary and the legislative is more a consequence of a shift in the dynamics of social culture, political ideology, and technological advances than a mere effect of the actions, identities and personas of those who have held office. This distinct ability of the executive to inevitably extend its power can thus be attributed to the vague nature of the Constitution regarding the Presidency, the emergence of the president as a cultural icon, the polarization of the two controlling political parties and ultimately the need for a unitary and decisive force leading the nation during times of war and desperation. America’s withdrawal from a policy of isolationism during the twentieth century, its endurance through domestic and foreign crises, its fortitude through a new age of liberalism and civil equality, and its Presidents’ ambitions and agendas through such political and social upheaval serve as a testament to the growth in power and size of the executive branch.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Effects Of Obstructionism

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages

    An obstructionist policy breaks the delicate nature of legislation itself, causing individuals to become disillusioned with the opposition party. President of the Florida Democratic Party Sally Boynton Brown reflects that “all those different checks and balances and why it takes so many steps for a law to become a law” are essential “to get to a place of compromise” (1-2). That the rule of law is necessary to ensure good legislation and discourse is contrary to how many individuals now see the function of government, which is constant gridlock. In frustration, they blame the opposition. Furthermore, Caplan of the New Yorker notes that some aspects of government are purposely not intended to be political, rather that “the Supreme Court is supposed to serve as the corrector and protector of the political branches” instead of being a political force itself (2). Playing partisan politics, especially with the Supreme Court, only drags an issue that should not be partisan into the political sphere, escalates partisanship, and slows down the ability of government to…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This election season, we are seeing a truly great power struggle between the two political parties in their efforts to further their own agendas. The biggest seat in the house, President of the United States, is up for grabs in the coming election. However, there is much more at stake, for both parties, than just the title of President. The winner of the election will set the tone of American politics for at least the next four years, and alongside that brand of politics will match an administration fit to carry out the Executive branches policy. Based on the to-be President’s direction, he/she will appoint cabinet members, administrative officials, and other likeminded bureaucrats that will assist in carrying out the ultimate policy vision.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays