Preview

The War On Free Speech Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The War On Free Speech Summary
The Shackled Pen

While I may only be 18 years old, federal laws have silenced me since 1988.

Stripped of my right of freedom of speech with the implementation of Hazelwood laws-- enacted after the Supreme Court case ruling in favor of the Hazelwood School District in the court case Tinker vs Hazelwood-- myself and other high school journalists all over the United States have lost our "unalienable right" to speak our minds in print.

As student journalists, our job dictates that we exhume the truths that others attempt to bury under fatuous pop-culture pieces. If the stories printed in the paper do not provoke emotion and push the envelope, the paper has failed to accomplish its purposes; however, the Hazelwood laws infringe on our first amendment
…show more content…
If society continues to shelter Generation Y from uncomfortable topics until they reach adulthood, the generation as a whole will lack the ability to efficiently deal with sensitive material. How can my peers take part in underage alcohol consumption, substance abuse, and premarital sex but cannot read a 500 word feature story on the uprise of political activism by use of social media?

In his "The War on Free Speech" segment from his Fox News hour, Censored in America, John Stossel stated: “(get real quote) Young kids can have sex, but they cannot handle hearing something that makes them uncomfortable.”

The federal government, as an institution that serves to protect not only its citizens but the rights of its citizens, cannot limit free speech. Especially free speech in the media. Putting a restriction on what people can and cannot say directly puts a restriction on their liberty. By telling high school students to censor themselves in order to ensure that they do not offend anyone, high school administrations inadvertently communicate to students that every disagreement they encounter is a personal assault. By prohibiting me from publishing a story out of fear that it may hurt someone’s feelings or make a student uncomfortable, my high school principal explicated to me that I should revere the comfort of others over the precedence of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Tinker vs Des Moines case is a land-mark case in upholding the rights of school children, and their freedom to express their opinions and views. Many have heard of the case, while others are unaware of its existence. The real conflict however is whether the defendants, John and Mary Beth Tinker were right or wrong. In December of 1965, the Tinker siblings decided to wear black armbands with peace signs on them to protest America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. After getting suspended from school, The Tinkers brought the case to the U.S. District Court, which raised the question: Were their rights violated? The answer is obvious. The school was incorrect in their actions, and the Tinkers rights were impeded upon because they did not cause…

    • 136 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I, _______, agree that school officials should be able to remove student publications when they believe material is unsuitable for younger students, or for reasons it could possibly disrupt the educational curriculum. If students are allowed "freedom of speech" other students could be slandered indirectly such as what occured in this case or fights may ensue due to disagreements. Yes, we as Americans have rights to speak our minds freely, but most students are minors and are under the supervision of the school. The school has the right to control what is allowed within its walls and must moniter students' doings in order to ensure the safety and eduaction of all students.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Josh Renville, an 18 year old student attending Fargo North High School has petitioned against the school in question for violating his first amendment right to freedom of speech. The school prohibited Renville from using a photograph in which he his holding his favorite rifle for his senior portrait in the yearbook. Renville claims that by prohibiting the photograph, the school is infringing on his rights to freedom of symbolic speech. Despite Renville’s claims, the actions taken by the administrators at Fargo North High were completely constitutional. Fargo North was acting well within their constitutional limits to promote the ideals of public education, to properly monitor any media that would have been associated with the school, and to limit any action that inherently interfered with the school’s disciplinary…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights, but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others, he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image. The minority opinion claims that the articles removed still represented individual student views. Those who argued the dissenting opinion justified it by expressing concern over what permitting censorship will do in the long run. For instance, if censorship was permitted in this case, it would set a precedent for general student censorship with…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This section summarizes the relevant findings in Brown v. EMA, Ginsberg v. New York, Case v. Unified School District, and Campbell v. St-Tammany Parish School Board to advance the overall thesis of this paper, developed in section three. The goal of using these four cases is to reveal that issues of labelling content material are central to the First and Fourteenth Amendment.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Supreme Court struck the delicate balance between maintaining an ordered school environment and inculcating First Amendment values within students in four cases, which together defined the boundaries of student-expression rights. The first of these cases, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District has been called the “magna carta of student’s expression rights.” The events in Tinker occurred in 1965 during the controversy of the Vietnam War. In Des Moines, Iowa, a group of adults and students objected to the Vietnam conflict by wearing black armbands. Principals in the area heard of these intentions and, “[feeling] that ‘the schools [were] no place for demonstrations,’” prohibited students from wearing black armbands to school. John and Mary Beth Tinker wore black armbands to school and were suspended when they refused to remove them. The Court held the prohibition and punishment an unconstitutional deprivation of the student’s expression rights because school officials could not of reasonably forecasted substantial disruption of school…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    case the principal refused approval to print. His reasoning was for the pregnancy article it mentioned birth control and sexual activity along with information from an anonymous source, but he felt readers would be able to figure out the person's identity. The divorce article was booted because it has a parents name. The court sided with the school because the newspaper is the schools (Brenyo). In this situation, the school does have the right to censor because it is their Newspaper, but they also missed out on an opportunity to address these important issues in a safe, professional setting and manner.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goverment 203

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages

    70. According to the Supreme Court’s ruling in NEAR V. MINNESOTA(1931), the standard for judging freedom of press is…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first amendment states that only if a person’s speech has substantial interference with school discipline or the rights of others it may be censored. Most people take that how it is supposed to be taken. If you actually read the law, it is easy to see that many things…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To summarize, the censoring of free speech due to ludicrous NDA’s, on college campuses, and by social media are abridging a fundamental freedom. As…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One case is Papish v. Board of Curators of the University of Missouri (1973), 410 U.S. 667. In this case Barbara Papish, a 32-year-old graduate journalism student at the University of Missouri, was expelled for distributing in the heart of a campus newspaper containing assuredly indecent speech. (Senat, 2013) The newspaper cartoon Papish published did not state any violence nor had true threats. University of Missouri did not have the right to expel Papish based on the fact the cartoon had offensive language. The courts filed in the favor of Papish. Papish case used reference from Healy v. James, in which the Court had alleged that even though a state university could enforce reasonable rules governing student conduct, "state colleges and universities are not enclaves immune from the sweep of the First Amendment (Senat, 2013)." Papish cartoon was protected because it did not promote threats nor…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Banning Books In Schools

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When America was created, it was supposed to be a place where people could have rights such as freedom of speech and press. Freedom of speech means that citizens have the right to say and think whatever they want. Freedom of press allows citizens to write down and publish their thoughts no matter how contradictory they are. Schools around America have contradicted this freedom by banning…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    College Censorship Rules

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Crippling the delivery of unpopular views is a terrible lesson to send to impressionable minds and future leaders” (Rampell 1). This quote taken from Catherine Rampell in her article “Free speech is flunking out on college campuses” explains that strict censorship rules hurt students whose minds are still developing. Rules on censorship in a college setting are supposed to protect the rights of students. Censorship is supposed to protect them from extremely hate filled speeches, newspaper articles, and other documents. For example, defamation, lies, and uses of extremely hateful name calling such as the word “nigger,” are all applicable to fair censorship rules. Today, the power of censorship has grown strong. In a scramble to not offend anyone,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The First Amendment

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Although the first amendment was written into our constitution, the translation of the meaning of the written word is often challenged. Some people believe freedom of speech should not include hate words, pornography, and vulgar language in our music or on the radio or public television. In addition, there are people who believe in freedom of religion but only if the faith is similar to their own and there is a constant debate regarding freedom of the press and what newspapers should be able to report. Because interpretation of the first amendment is sometimes challenged, some court rulings on important cases regarding freedom of speech, religion, and press have changed some perceptions.…

    • 1954 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays