Preview

The Use Of Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
213 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Use Of Rhetorical Devices In Julius Caesar
Within the world of politics, rhetorical devices such as pathos, ethos, and logos, have aided politicians in persuading their intended audience to believe in their claims. In the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, two opposing characters use funeral speeches to attain what they want. After Caesar’s death, Antony na d Brutus must convince the plebeians of Rome that he is just and correct in their ways. Both men express their claims through the usage of rhetorical devices. Antony, a loyal friend of Caesar’s, is known to be both pleasure-seeking, impulsive, and passionate. He is exceptionally spontaneous and is a threat to both Brutus and his conspirators. One the other hand, Brutus is a Roman nobleman who forms a rebel group, called

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The art of manipulation and persuasion is truly effective when one is incompetent to the fact that they alone are not thinking for themselves. Since the beginning of time, humankind has wanted to have control. In some instances they will strive for power in ways that make them oblivious to right and wrong. Occasionally, they will go against what they are told to do and instead to what they want to do. In the play Julius Caesar the power of persuasion and manipulation of language is clear when two men, Brutus and Mark Antony, spiel to the people of their country, each attempting to gain the support of the populace over the death of Caesar. Even though Brutus establishes ethos throughout his speech, Mark Antony’s uses it to his advantage…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the eulogy at Caesar’s funeral, Marc Antony, close friend of Caesar and general, seems to claim that he believes that Marcus Brutus and the rest of the men involved with the death of Caesar are honorable men, but in actuality believes that Caesar was the only honorable man in the Senate who was always there for his country and brought prosperity to his country. He also claims to not want to get revenge on the murderers of Caesar, but in reality, the whole point of his speech was to turn the citizens of Rome against Brutus so that Caesar’s death will be avenged. He develops this claim by first creating ethos and pathos refuting Brutus’ excuse that Caesar was ambitious. Then, he emphasizes the grand betrayal of Brutus towards Caesar. Towards…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Literature naturally comes to mind as a rich resource for the study of persuasion. To persuade someone completely, one must use rhetorical devices to overcome one of the three key decision making factors: Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. One major concern of Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar is about rhetoric, the skill of persuading people with words. Appeals to logos, pathos and ethos are effectively made to reveal the characters as seen in Cassius, Brutus and Mark Antony respectively throughout the play.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The paralyzing powers of speech often engulfs the human mind and corrupts it to the will of the speaker. Omnipresent in society, rhetorical appeals, the appealing powers of speech, are made to project the speaker’s thoughts and ideas of a subject matter. From ordinary conversations to commercial advertisements to public addresses, appeals are present to influence an audience’s mindset. The appeal of Logos creates compelling evidence for the audience to develop conclusions in the speaker’s favor while the appeal of Pathos relies on morals, values, and emotions to create a response from the audience. Combined with the appeal of Ethos to establish credibility in the speaker, the appeals are potentially powerful enough to cause everlasting impacts on society and revise history itself. Throughout history, great orators such as Hitler, Martin Luther King, and other political leaders have used the power of speech to transform people’s thoughts and ideas. This practice has dated back to ancient times to Mark Antony at the funeral of his friend and mentor, Julius Caesar. In William Shakespeare’s Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony establishes himself to his audience, the plebeians, with Ethos then uses Pathos to pull on the audience’s heartstrings and sway the plebeians’ beliefs with Logos in an attempt to make the audience doubt Brutus’s justification of killing Caesar because he was ambitious.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power can be used to sway people’s attitudes and opinions. Often people can be steered in different directions by different people. In Julius Caesar the crowd, or mob of citizens, seem to have no direct purpose in the play. Brutus easily manipulates their thoughts of Caesar before and at the time of his death. At the funeral of Caesar the crowd initially agree with Brutus’ perspectives on Caesar. In Act 3, Scene 2, one citizen calls out “Let him (Brutus) be Caesar.” They continue to call out to Brutus in favour of his actions. However, when Antony arrives their position changes. When Antony speaks and suddenly Caesar is noble and the crowd swear revenge on the assassinators. Antony is able to sway the crowd with his persuasive and emotive speech where he begins by describing Brutus as ‘honourable’ and ‘noble’. His use of repetition creates a reflective mood and is used to emphasise his thoughts of Caesar. He then goes on to recall Caesar’s great qualities and thus begins to turn the crowd. This conflict between powerful figures in society is projected in society in a controlling way.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Caesar start

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pathos, ethos, and logos are three persuasive tools used by Antony and Brutus at Caesar's funeral. Both Brutus and Antony's speeches given, greatly impacted the citizens of Rome . This passage, Julius Caesar, is written by William Shakespeare. This is a play based on a historical event led by the tragedy of the Roman leader ,Caesar, who was killed by his disloyal friends. Within this passage, Brutus and a group of conspirators gathered together upon the action to betrayal Caesar and take over the city Rome. In addition, they all believed that Caesar did not deserve the throne and they had to destroy him. At Caesar’s funeral both Brutus and Antony created heartfelt speeches in order to persuade the flustered citizens of Rome. However, I can conclude that the logos, pathos, and ethos in Antony's speech was much more persuadable than Brutus's unfavorable speech.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps the most significant figure of speech is the metaphor from Act IV, Scene 3, in which Brutus refuses to listen to the advice of Cassius to not march to Philippi, but rather let the triumvirate's troops come to them:…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play, “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar,” by William Shakespeare, two very dear friends of Caesar give speeches at Caesar’s funeral, Brutus and Mark Antony. Brutus, who killed Caesar tries to excuse himself and the conspirators for murdering Caesar. Antony desires to rile up the common people to revolt against Brutus and his accomplices. While both speeches seem to be compelling, Mark Antony’s speech worked the best at persuading the audience through his use of rhetorical devices such as logical reasoning and repetition.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play “Julius Caesar” by Shakespeare, the power of words is displayed throughout the entire work. Speech plays a large role in the plot of “Julius Caesar”. Generally, when people try to get what they want or to persuade others; they use words. The fickle plebeians are swayed through Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, there were two honorable men who were great persuaders that manipulated the sheep's' (plebeians) mind. Those two orators were Brutus and Antony, and Antony who comes out on top in the end. Brutus and the conspirators first kill Caesar by stabbing him and then explaining to the Romans their reason for doing such 'good' deed. Brutus gets the attention of every Roman in the town and asks them to hear him out before acting and spilling more blood. To start out with, Brutus’s speech was formal and more directed to the Romans. In his introduction he starts with “Romans, countrymen, and lovers! (13)” He used this to join everyone together and later help him justify Caesar’s death. Throughout his whole speech, he kept calling Caesar ambitious to make it seem like he was only thinking about himself. Then, Brutus delivers a passionate speech involving ethos in which he affirms his position as an honorable and loving friend of Caesar who loved him more than any man in Rome, but only killed him because he loved Rome more. He employs logos and reasons with the crowd that Caesar had grown too powerful and ambitious and if not stopped, would turn the plebs into slaves. Also, Brutus says that he would rather kill Caesar and bear shame before Caesar enslaved the plebs and that Brutus expects the plebs to do the same exact thing if they were put into Brutus's situation. Even though Brutus went first, swayed the sheep's mind, and had a clear advantage over Antony, he still lost in the end.…

    • 511 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus and Antony are both portrayed as above average orators in the play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, and they both use this skill to achieve there preplanned goals in there speeches. Brutus's goal was to rationalize the assassination of Caesar and to convince the people that Brutus and his fellow conspirators were actually heroes for what they did. On the other hand Antony's goal was to turn the people of Rome against the conspirators and to more brightly illuminate the good things that Caesar did, and in doing so make the people want to seek revenge for there leaders death. Even though Brutus and Antony have separate and completely opposite goals they both use certain tactics to woo the crowd in there favor. They did this by appealing to the crowd, using irony, and by applying the principles of human behavior to the situation.…

    • 748 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In act III, scene ii William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both deliver speeches to the roman public at Caesar funeral. Both of their purpose in speaking to the roman citizens to defend their belief regarding Caesar’s assassination and convince the audience. In the following essay, I will illustrate Antony’s speech was more rhetorically powerful than Brutus. I will analyze the strength, credibility and effectiveness of each speech based on the insight of Aristotle.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Authors use literary devices in their works for a variety of reasons. The same holds true in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. The use of these devices has an effect on the plot's development. Several literary devices can be seen in Julius Caesar, and they all have an effect on the plot.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays