Preview

The Us President Is Effectively Unrestrained Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1745 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Us President Is Effectively Unrestrained Essay
“The US President is effectively unrestrained in the exercise of political power within the US system of government”. How far do you agree with this statement? (30 marks)

The power of the President has evolved since the constitution was ratified in 1788. It can be said that the President enjoys a more exercised form of power as American politics has developed and adapted but they are not “effectively unrestrained” due to the many checks are balances that a President must regard when asserting their power.
The constitution sets out formal powers of the President in article II. These include chief administrator, commander-in-chief, chief lawmaker and head of state. However, there has been a growth of informal powers that include chief legislator, party leader, world leader and chief diplomat. It is with these informal powers that President is able to have more freedom with exercising and asserting their power. Following this is Neustadt’s theory of “persuader in chief”. This can be expressed through the State of Union address. On the 25th January 2011, Barack Obama gave his state of the union address focusing on his views on the issues in
…show more content…
However, American politics has evolved and there are circumstances to which a President is allowed to exercise an increased amount of power because part of his/her “head of state role” includes people turning to them for answers and decisions and therefore emergency powers need to be at hand in order for them to be able to do this. However, they are not effectively unrestrained because there are always collective bodies there monitoring the President’s decisions. Even if the policies are dealing with foreign affairs, the media are always around documenting and reporting back to the republic and their opinions can be seen as restraining to a President much like Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Key Point: "Presidential power is the power to persuade." (11) Presidents are expected to do much more than their authority allows them to do. Persuasion and bargaining are the means that presidents use to influence policy. Not only do presidents need to bargain to influence other branches of government (particularly Congress), but presidents also must bargain to influence the executive branch itself; cabinet secretaries, agency heads, and individual bureaucrats all have leverage that they can use against the president, requiring presidents to persuade even the executive branch, not merely command it.…

    • 1972 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Political scientist Edward S. Corwin once observed that “the history of the presidency has been a history of aggrandizement.” Explain and critique Corwin’s observation from the standpoint of the allocation of constitutional powers and the Supreme Court’s interpretation of presidential…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think as the book states that the presidency and its scope have grown dramatically since its creation. I don’t think the framers had the vision of today’s world when they created the position. That being said, the one thing that has not changed or grown is the President still must answer to Congress and the people. I think he has a huge amount of responsibility and sometimes enough and sometimes not enough power. It just depends on the situation and where his presidential powers lie on the scale for that problem.…

    • 563 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion is I agree that the president has usurped the constitiutional power of the Congress. I agree this statement because he is wielding the most pontent legislative power. The Constitution does quote that “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in the Congress of the United States.” Most people agree that he has usurped the Constitiutional Power of Congress. It also seems that the president seems to wield the legislative power. In Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitiution states that the president “shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Congress wields the legislative power and it seems the president is wielding that power.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Govt Ch 13

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Write out your answers and submit them using the Dropbox in a RTF or Word Doc format. Presidential Power and Iraq This exercise relates to the Policy Debate in Chapter 13 dealing with Iraq and Presidential Power. The goal of this exercise is to give you a better understanding of recent Supreme Court rulings on the limits of Presidential power during wartime and the importance of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. The Constitution (as interpreted by the Supreme Court) balances the need for security against the need for freedom and human rights. You will read and discuss two articles from the Christian Science Monitor, the goal of which will give you a better understanding of the limits on Presidential power and the importance of freedom.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The president, throughout history, has always been a symbol of the country and has had powers for their title. However, there are only limited things the President can do, while they are in power. For the most part the President has to go through the congress, which might not accept the president’s request. The president should have the power to go beyond the bounds of the Constitution when the country is dealing with war or rebellion, and to take action if the lives of US citizens are in danger or to keep international peace in foreign countries.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the framers of the Constitution designed the presidency, they had no way of predicting how the powers of the office would gradually expand over time. The Founders envisioned the executive to be independent – having no direct constituency relationship with either Congress or the public – as well as restrained. They gave the power to declare war to Congress, implicitly prohibiting the President from committing troops to a long-term conflict (Article I Section 8). However, if the Founders saw the presidency today, I believe they would strongly disapprove.Today, the executive is closely tied to popular will, not the Constitution. In many states, electors are legally obligated for the winner of the popular vote in their state. Many modern presidents…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Presidential Power and the Power to Persuade, Richard E. Neustadt argues that Presidents should persuade and bargain not command, should have shared powers not separated powers, and should draw power from his reputation.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The president is still a citizen of the United States; therefore laws apply to the president too. I do believe the president should have some power to ensure the safety of the people by possibly breaking laws, but this power could easily be abused. Like Richard Nixon, he did not have this power and still abused it. Also, the legislative and judicial branches do not have the power to make these decisions and nobody is considering allowing this. But, the constitution says all branches are equal in power and no branch should have complete control over something. How would the legislative and judicial branch check this power and how would they stop the president form abusing this power? If the country allows the president to break laws now, then eventually the country will allow the president to do something else and eventually the president will gain too much…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Us Wars

    • 4433 Words
    • 18 Pages

    The Constitution doesn’t want the president to be too powerful; therefore, there are checks and balances. The framers wanted division of authority in order to balance foreign policy power. This includes the fact that only Congress can declare war, ratify treaties, and make appropriations (funding) for war. War…

    • 4433 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unitary executive theory argues that the president of the United States has complete executive power that is unchecked by the Legislative branch and the Judicial branch. This controversial theory has been invoked repeatedly by the Bush administration and previous presidents such as Nixon and Franklin Roosevelt in justification of their boldest actions, both at home and abroad.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The questions of how much power the President should have and how the constitution limits him are asked frequently. The constitution defines the powers of both Congress and the president in Articles I and II, but in the two hundred years since the constitution has been written, the interpretations of this framework have varied immensely. The US Congress is often referred to as the most powerful legislature in the world, and it certainly has been remarkably successful in remaining independent from executive branch influence. However, presidential power has grown, particularly in the 20th century.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Expansion of Power

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Like I have mentioned in my first paragraph the increase of the authority of the president satisfies me greatly. As Niccolo Machiavelli put it “He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command.” Without the power the president has he/she is another tool of Congress if obeying the Constitution. The whole point of the Framers re-writing the Articles of Confederation is to create a stronger national government. What is the whole point if the most powerful person in the country has so much limitation put on him/her by the Constitution that he/she is pretty much powerless? The president has become, according to political author Gene Healy, “a soul nourisher, a hope giver, a living American talisman against hurricanes, terrorism, economic downturns, and spiritual malaise. He-or she-is the one who answers the phone at 3am to keep our children safe from harm. The modern president is America 's shrink, a social worker”. So to all you political analysts who study the expansion of presidential power if the…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The President is the elected Head of State in the USA, it is through to be the most powerful position in the world however Neustadt concluded otherwise. Presidents have various powers and duties such as acting as Commander in Chief and proposing legislation. Some may argue however, the President only has, what Neustadt concluded “The power to Persuade.”…

    • 1397 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays