Preview

The US Government Watching You

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The US Government Watching You
Watching You The government has many ways of keeping us safe here in the US. Most people aren’t informed of just how far the government has come to make the US as safe as it is. From reading the article “Watching You” I now know to which degree that the government is watching us. The argument about whether or not the government’s surveillance on Americans is a violation of privacy or not has been going on since “a 30-year-old former contractor for the National Security Agency (N.S.A), leaked details of the surveillance programs to the media,”. In my opinion, the government is simply going out of their way to keep our nation safe. “. . .body scanners, shoe searches at airports, video surveillance cameras on many buildings and city streets, and more intrusive questions at border crossings.”, due to the terrorist attack of September 11th, 2001, procedures such as those listed are quite necessary in order to prevent events such as “9/11” from occurring yet again. “. . .Eavesdropping on e-mails and online chats of foreigners overseas.”, this is another procedure that is a bit personal yet very mandatory. Without the government checking communication that goes overseas, just anyone could easily set up a terrorist attack in America by simply sending an e-mail. People such as the American Civil Liberties Union (A.C.L.U.) believe that these minor mechanisms (such as video surveillance, body scanners, etc.), are a violation of the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment covers “ The police need a court-issued warrant to search your home. . . to listen in on the phone calls of suspected criminals. . .to search your car.” The methods the government has done as far as surveillance does not interfere with any part that is mentioned in the Fourth Amendment. Therefore, the surveillance that the government is doing is not an invasion of privacy, yet a way to protect our nation from another day of the tragic events of 9/11.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    citizens, and the government would have too much capability to go behind our backs, unnecessarily, and spy on us. The Federal Bureau of Investigation has freely admitted that it has not launched or found any extensive cases through the Patriot Act’s privileges. (Ybarra, n.d.) The question is, though, if they can not find any cases of terrorism, smuggling, or organized crimes what are they doing? The Government is spying on us through every piece of technology that we own. They can find us within the blink of an eye through our cell phones, computers, and bluetooth devices. They can hack into any of our Facebook accounts, emails, internet search browsers. They can view a person through their phone or computer's camera without them even knowing. The government can also turn on your microphones through the same devices and listen to you and what you are doing at any moment. The National Security Agency has put its codes into Android's operating systems, hacking into three quarters of the world's smartphones. (Tyler Durden, July 9th,…

    • 3008 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If someone told you “You are being watched every time you use digital communications, “how would you feel? The majority of people would probably feel discomfort. Sadly, you are being watched by the National Security Agency or NSA. While they allegedly keep us safe, the NSA shouldn't continue to monitor everyone’s digital communications. It gets every tax paying citizens money involved. They violate an amendment of the constitution. Likewise, there is a major loss of privacy. They simply have access to too much information. (Pathos)…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essentially, technology has made it easier for the authorities to conduct covert surveillance. Private citizens can become the targets of police and law enforcement searches. Oftentimes, there might seem to be a reasonable cause. The question comes down to whether or not the state has the right to spy on its citizens disguised behind the veil of potential criminal activity. The concern for many Fourth Amendment advocates is the apparent ease with which technology, specifically with TIDs, can make the decision. At points, surveillance could be conducted without the knowledge of the person whose rights are potentially being trampled on.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    September 11 2001, marked a very tragic day in history, and immediate action was required in order to handle the situation. During the Bush administration, surveillance programs were put into place in order to monitor possible hostile actions towards our country. In a post Snowden article in 2006, Robert A. Levy went into depth about what Article II is and if current programs put into place can be deemed illegal. After reviewing Article II and Levy’s position I agree that it was illegal, but I believe that this was because what need to take place was described vaguely and was left up to interpretation. The fourth amendment speaks about using “reasonableness,” what might be reasonable to one may not mean the same to another. Due to this, abuse…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the United States, the safety and protection of the American people has always been a primary ideal of the United States government. In the past five years, new technology has emerged that has aided the government in ensuring this ideal. In the novel 1984, by George Orwell, Orwell uses a dystopian society to portray a government which utilizes technology and procedures to make it seem like they are protecting the citizens, but in reality is generating fear to control and have complete power over the people. In modern America, the government has been accused of similar actions and procedures. However, the United States government does not have the same intentions. Given the domestic and international threats present, heightened security like security cameras in schools as well as other public grounds and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) are used solely for the protection and preservation of the liberty of the American people.…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The abomination that domestic surveillance is should have never even been thought of, much less executed every single day. Go home and demand to have privacy, demand for the Fourth Amendment to be respected again, demand for this madness to stop, and never settle for less. “BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU” (Orwell…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Scans

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The TSA protects airports by implementing frisking and full body scanners. These scanners are implemented to find guns, chemicals, bombs and other illicit substances. The full body scanners are able to view our full body under our clothes. These full body scanners are also able to detect nonmetal objects such as medicine. The Washington Post mentions how these scanners are too invasive because the data of these scans are stored not discarded as the scanners in the Netherlands as mentioned by the same article. According to the EPIC as reported by the Boston Globe, the full body scans are a direct violation of the 4th amendment because they search citizens digitally without any evidence of the citizen doing something wrong. The 4th amendment states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” A majority of these searches are unreasonable and there is no warrant to make these laws constitutional. Although there are some criticisms of the searching, according to a Gallup poll conducted in 2010, a majority of Americans are fine with a full body scans thinking it is more…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1984 and Privacy

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many Americans are being watched, in great detail, by the government. In its ongoing battle against crime and terrorism, the U.S. has ramped up its surveillance on individuals over the years. As in the book, 1984, by George Orwell, "Big Brother Is Watching You". Many people feel that this surveillance is a major invasion of privacy and a violation of their rights.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ender's Game

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I mentioned before, government does have a small role in our personal lives in America, although some people might not realize it. After the tragedy of 9/11, the government stepped up efforts to prevent another terrorism attack on the U.S. Specifically, in The 9/11 Dilemma: Freedom vs. Security, it said “... Congress united to pass the Patriot Act, which expanded the government’s powers to conduct counterterrorism surveillance and investigations.” This gave the government the ability to do many new things, such as to monitor phone calls, conduct surveillance on anyone, and to go through household trash. In the second reference document I was given called Preserving Life and Liberty, it described more of the governments rights with the Patriot Act. It stated that the government could have access to library records, and could perform searches without first obtaining a warrant.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of these new procedures interfere with basic human rights, such as our right to privacy. For instance, following the ISIS attack, France made new laws in order to make deporting suspected terrorist easier and launched more air strikes against ISIS. Similarly, Bush implemented the NSA domestic spying program after the crisis of 9/1. Confidential until 2005, the program monitored somewhere between 500-1000 communications over the phone or via email of people inside the US suspected to have connections with Al Qaeda without any warrants. Through major telecommunication companies, the program created a database of every call ever made and continues to monitor everything, searching them for key words. While it may help them find potential threats to the country, there was no warrant for it and violates the constitution. In reaction to terrorists, governments have tried to increase security but have nearly eliminated the security of our privacy in doing…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All citizens of The United States deserve their privacy, but in those emergency situations where you have to invade someone’s privacy for the greater good of others than that’s acceptable. The Fourth Amendment offers and important safeguard against unjustified government surveillance, all of us are granted that right when we are born in the United States.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wiretapping provides the most extreme example of the U.S. government abuse of its powers. For the U.S. government to spy on its own citizens without any consent goes against any right to privacy given to the public by the Constitution. And acts like the "Protect America Act," proposed by President Bush and his supporters to make wiretapping a warrantless procedure, do little to correct the situation (Peter). The U.S. government needs to take responsibility for more of its actions, instead of trying to justify them by making them laws. Terrorism may be a major concern, but U.S. citizens should not have to trade their freedom for safety. Acts like these that encourage spying on citizens only limit Americans' liberties without their knowledge thereof. Ideas like wiretapping are things that should be brought before the general public or at least members of Congress to gain their consent, instead of allowing one branch of the government to proceed unchecked.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is everything actually secure, or do they mislead us into false hope? The FBI, CIA, and our troops fight vigorously for our safety, but they are only human and cannot stop every crime. A national surveillance system in the government could stop actions before it happened. If violent crimes could be stopped before it happened, who wouldn’t jump to the cause? Millions of people could be living in peace. While security is important, some might reject being monitored because it is against their will. A surveillance system will know everything in people’s public lives and calculate every action. Private things will now turn into public business. If we were stubborn enough to reject an idea of a surveillance system, then we are letting the population die by violent hate crimes. The violence in our country will only grow in time, we must take action to stop it. We must be willing to sacrifice, believe, and fight for justice. There is no protection in the submission to crime. We must take action in the well-being of to nation. If it were to mean giving up some of our rights, it is for a worthy cause. Let’s stop crime and protect our beloved United…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government is not spending enough time and resource in surveillance, which is resulting in the threats and decrease of national security. Surveillance is the act of observing, or monitoring a person. Monitoring a person can include the use of cameras, wiretaps, GPS tracking, and internet surveillance. Events such as the Oklahoma City bombing, and the attack on 9/11 lead to a law former President Bush passed. "On October 26th, 2001, Bush signed into law the USA Patriot Act." (Podesta) Government surveillance is an essential part of everyday life because not only does it keep the country under control, but ensures safety for Americans.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Surveillance is a feature used by the modern government. Surveillance is supposedly used by the government for preventing /investigating crimes and gathering information, however it can also be used by criminal organisations for planning and committing crimes, which is ironic. Technology allows the government to track online activities, people’s movements and communications. Most people would consider surveillance a breach of privacy and it is opposed by numerous activist groups since most authoritarian governments don’t have any domestic restrictions, which means that governments are allowed to access your information whenever they choose without relevant justification. George Orwell’s “Nineteen Eighty Four” warn of the negative effects of surveillance and how the government can use it to control people. It is believed if…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays