Preview

The Unusual War Of Thomas Hobbes All Against All

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1062 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Unusual War Of Thomas Hobbes All Against All
Hobbes argues that the state of nature is a state of perpetual war of all against all and consequently, the life of man in the state of nature "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short" (xiii, 9). In this paper I will explain Hobbes' arguments that support his claim to the state of nature. I will also assess these arguments and state that they are not valid and, therefore, not sound. I will then talk about the most controversial premise, relative scarcity of goods, and how Hobbes would respond to the objections of this premise. I will then talk about his response to this objection being unsuccessful. Finally, I will assess whether it will be possible to leave the state of nature given the factors Hobbes describes that create the state of nature. I will show that Hobbes' argument on how men will leave the state of nature is a valid and sound argument. …show more content…
First, Hobbes states that there is a rough equality among men. Hobbes means by equality of men, that one man is not strong or intelligent enough that he can overpower two men. Secondly, because of this equality between men, if there is competition for the same goods, men will begin to distrust each other. Lastly, Hobbes states that because of this mistrust there is a cascade effect. The anticipation of one man being attacked causes them to attack the other because they consider it a better option to attack, rather than wait and be attacked. According to Hobbes this leads to a war of all against
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Is The State Of Nature A Hobsian State Of War Of All Against All

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes
    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Locke And Hobbes

    After analyzing how Locke and Hobbes understand the state of nature it is evident that they share many ideas but they also show essential differences in their ideas. Hobbes regards the state of nature as a state of war, in which natural law is established only after a process of reasoning. This process leads men to the conclusion that they must somehow find…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics
    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page

    Thomas Hobbes: A Basis For Politics

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lord of the Flies--The Evils of Mankind
    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lord of the Flies--The Evils of Mankind

    Thomas Hobbes, an Enlightenment philosopher, claimed that mankind is naturally evil and selfish and will cause conflicts “if any two men desire the same thing, which they nevertheless cannot both enjoy” or have differing opinions, in order to gain more power so that they can freely pursue their selfish desires, especially “during the time men live without a common power” and “in that condition which is called war, every man against every man,” and are therefore incapable of self-governing. Hobbes’ position on human nature is easily observable; intolerance and bigotry causes violence and general public…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes' Remedy for

    The final sentence of that passage, "And the life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short," seems to sum up what Hobbes has been leading up to in the first twelve chapters of Leviathan: that without a sovereign power, without Leviathan, the natural life of man is simply horrible. It is a life in which people naturally and constantly seek to destroy one another.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes And Rousseau Analysis
    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hobbes And Rousseau Analysis

    Hobbes talks about his view of Human Nature in his book The Leviathan. His central belief was built around the idea that the nature of humanity leads people to seek power. He believed that humans naturally desired the power to live well, and that human beings will never be satisfied with the power they currently possess unless they acquire more power. Hobbes defined power as” the ability to…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final
    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Phil 103 Final

    1D. The state of nature is Hobbes’ description of what human beings lived like prior to the existence of a state or civilized society. In this existence, all humans were equal in that they all wanted to achieve their ultimate end and they all had the right to do what they thought necessary for survival…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Hobbes And Rousseau In Lord Of The Flies
    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Hobbes And Rousseau In Lord Of The Flies

    For centuries, the natural state of man has been a major theme in political philosophy. and two major contributors to this philosophy are Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau. Their theories both appeals to the state of nature as a phase before the formation of a political society, however, their views of a man’s state of nature are quite different. With that being said, many will read William Golding’s Lord of the Flies, and will see what Golding’s view of man’s state of nature is like, but disagree with each other if it takes the side of Hobbes or Rousseau. To help identify which comparison is more well suited, one should think to himself if humans are innately good or bad people.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Research Paper
    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    John Locke Research Paper

    He believes that people who can’t agree will end up in war which causes destruction in mankind. Considering that Thomas Hobbes was around his mid-50s when the English Civil War happened. Hobbes must have been traumatized by the violence making him believe that people are corrupt and are selfish and horrible. Despite Hobbes thinking, I believe it's wrong for him to judge all of humanity based on a certain event that occurred devastatingly in his life. He should have seen the positivity in people rather than the negativity.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Research Paper On Thomas Hobbes
    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Research Paper On Thomas Hobbes

    His writing is focused on the evils of mankind, as well as the government’s role in preventing man from reverting back to the competitive behavior that he is condemned to. Thomas Hobbes believed that humans could not live in peace and harmony as other creatures do, because “men are continually in competition for honour and dignity... and consequently amongst men there ariseth on that ground, envy and hatred, and finally war…” Additionally, man’s joy “consisteth in comparing himself with other men, [and] can relish nothing but what is eminent.” In any revolution, there is a constant battle for who will become the next leader. The first post-revolution leader can effect major changes, because they are responsible for setting a new precedent in leadership style. They are also able to rebuild the system themselves. And as a result of the all the “eminent” power available that men are obsessed with, many men are tempted by the idea of becoming the leviathan, therefore they must compete to decide who takes the position. So, during a time of civil war, this “envy and hatred” between men is at its peak. It seems natural then, that a man surrounded by this competition and war, could conclude that competition must be mankind’s natural state. From his perspective, this natural state of war came after the downfall of a steady government, and so he believed…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes Vs Mill
    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Mill

    Hobbes offers support to his claim that nature makes men apt to fight one another, by showing how people act in their own self-interest. When people act in their own self-interest they look to preserve their own life. Hobbes believes in his definition of nature that man must use their own virtues of protection to ultimately preserve themselves. The way Hobbes describes the motivation is quite simple. For instance, in modern society, one may still lock our homes regardless if it is a perfectly safe area – this is due to Hobbes’ concept of, “self-preservation.” Nevertheless, the root of these actions is actually…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes Vs Locke
    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Hobbes Vs Locke

    He begins noting that humans are essentially equal, both mentally and physically, in so far as even the weakest person has the strength to kill the strongest. Given our equal standing, Hobbes continues by noting how situations in nature make us naturally prone to quarrel. There are three natural causes of disagreement among people: competition for limited supplies of material possessions, distrust of one another, and glory in so far as people remain hostile to preserve their powerful reputation. Given the natural causes of conflict, Hobbes concludes that the natural condition of humans is a state of perpetual war of all against all, where no morality exists, and everyone lives in constant fear (Hobbes Pt 1, Ch…

    • 5047 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Role of Fear in Hobbes' Leviathan
    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role of Fear in Hobbes' Leviathan

    As Hobbes’ continually points out, in a state of nature, fear is the most antagonizing force that a man produces to be used against others to perpetuate a state of constant war. It is this fear, along with the struggle for as much power as possible (which Hobbes establishes that it is men’s reasoning to do so) that creates the balance beam act which acts as the driving force for men to seek each other out and pursue peace. This pursuit for peace amongst themselves is not only instigated for the greater good of themselves, but also society as a whole, whereby in realizing the interconnectedness of their fellow peoples, men consent to the “social contract” that Hobbes’ presents.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Locke Synthesis
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Locke Synthesis

    The natural state of humanity promotes personal freedom and rights with the demand of peace. They are born inherently good and in a “state of perfect freedom.”1 The law of nature is the primitive law of life that creates personal rights. The law of nature protects people’s freedoms and keeps them under a code. While individuals are born inherently good, moderate greed is included in the law of nature as a way for “[man] to preserve himself” and to “preserve the rest of mankind.”2 The individual is put before all of mankind because mankind cannot survive without the individual. While the individual is the most important there are restrictions to protect each man’s freedom. The law of nature Hobbes creates a state of nature where each man fights and survives for himself. In Hobbes’s state of nature there is no way for each man to thrive. Locke believes that not all men are evil and sets the law of nature to be livable for all individuals. Locke does not follow Hobbes’s brutal state of nature by not allowing men to violate the rights of other individuals.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes
    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Hobbes

    Natural and inherently known by all because it can be deduced by innate mental faculties (reason, philosophy).…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics