Preview

The Unraveling of Sanity

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
586 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Unraveling of Sanity
The Unraveling of Sanity:

Guilt as the Cause of Raskolnikov’s Mental Instability in Dostoevsky’s Crime and Punishment

Eric Matthew Charles Sheldon

5/22/2013

Word Count: 1650

This Written Assignment will delve into the mind of Raskolnikov and show how Raskolnikov’s guilt causes his mental instability. Raskolnikov’s guilt also causes his other physical symptoms. The way Raskolnikov relieves his guilt is by his confession to the police, after the scene in the Hay Market, in which he kisses the ground.
Raskolnikov’s guilt stems from the confliction of his humanity with the atrocity that he committed when he murdered “‘the old pawnbroker woman and her sister Lizaveta with an axe and robbed them.’” (Dostoevsky 526). Raskolnikov was motivated not only by his greed and lust for money, but by many other factors. Raskolnikov was “crushed by poverty” (Dostoevsky 1) and was barely able to buy food. Another motivation for Raskolnikov was his idea that he is a “superman” and that he was allowed, even supposed, to harm others and kill for the good of society. These factors: greed, hunger, the idea of “supermen” etc. all contributed to the fall of Raskolnikov.
The idea that Raskolnikov is a superman comes from his time at university where he wrote a paper called “On Crime.” Raskolnikov believes that society has been "somewhat arbitrarily" divided into two groups, the ordinary and the extraordinary. Raskolnikov believes that the duty of the “ordinary” is to be like sheep, the society its self. The second group, the “extraordinary” are those who are better, a step above the rest. They have the ability and the responsibility to overstep morals and disregard the rights of the “ordinary.” The “Supermen” have a duty to society to break whatever laws and restrictions that apply to the “ordinary” to better the society as a whole. Raskolnikov labels Napoleon as one of these “Supermen”. He tells us that Napoleon had the right to kill all of the men that he did



Cited: Dostoevsky, Fydor. Crime and Punishment. Trans. Constance Gartnett. New York: Random House, 2003. Print.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Crime and Punishment

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov's guilt got the worst of him. After the murder, he was called to the police where he overheard conversations about the murder which caused him to faint. When he recovered, he blamed fainting on the paint and hurried home because his guilt made him think "there will be a search at once." (pg 109) Rodya fell ill which was because he had to face a great deal of tormenting guilt. The amount of guilt he had in his heart sparked the meaning of the novel which was a form of punishment for his crime.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rift between Raskolnikov and the rest of society is introduced when he first describes his “extraordinary man” theory. Raskolnikov develops his theory during a specific time when he has isolated himself in his room to contemplate solutions to his life problems. Raskolnikov studies how other “great” men in history have solved their problems. He points out “that the majority of those benefactors and guiding spirits of mankind were particularly fearsome bloodletters” (309). Napoleon is specifically referenced. Raskolnikov believes that some men, like Napoleon, are “extraordinary,” or above the moral rules that govern the rest of society. As a result, “great” men, similar to Napoleon, are entitled to do as they please. As Raskolnikov considers committing murder, he justifies this behavior saying, “One death to a hundred lives…the old woman is harmful. She’s wearing another person’s life out” (80-1). Raskolnikov believes that he fits in this “extraordinary” category, therefore making it acceptable for him to murder Alyona, the common pawnbroker. He believes himself to be a “great” man, acting for a higher purpose beyond conventional moral law. This theory proves to be inaccurate, thus creating the breach between Raskolnikov and society’s views of acceptable moral behavior.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Signifigance: When Dostoevsky is saying “law of nature” he is specifically speaking of Raskolnikov’s guilt and how he can’t escape it. This quote is said by Porify Petrovitch to explain that Raskolnikov’s guilt humanizes him and proves that Porify Petrovitch is a possible…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Study Guide Lesson 1

    • 5830 Words
    • 24 Pages

    When forced to live under such conditions where there is no sight of normality, one such as Raskolnikov may begin to believe that because they are different from most of the society, they are allowed to disobey the law by means of reaching their needs and wants.…

    • 5830 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rasconikov Duality

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Rasconikov’s isolated, detached, sneaky and disconnected side is when most of his intellectual scheming goes on. There is never any spontaneous moves when in this state, but more so every action being premeditated. This side of his personality is where he strategizes his theories about crime and how to commit it. Raskolnikov believes that the “extraordinary” are able to be independent, and not influenced by others on the outside, but only being influenced by oneself, being self-sufficient without company or the hand of another, which explains why his intellectual side is very isolated.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both characters reject ordinary standards and morals; good and evil are ambiguous, and they are pressured both socially and emotionally. “ … I am eking out my days in my corner, taunting myself with the bitter and entirely useless consolation that an intelligent man cannot seriously become anything; that only a fool can become something.” as indicated in this quote, the underground man believes that “an intelligent man” is incapable of becoming prominent. “Yes, sir, an intelligent nineteenth century man must be, is morally bound to be, an essentially characterless creature; and a man of character, a man of action-an essentially limited creature.”, the quote is an elaboration on the character’s previous statement; he defines “an intelligent man” that is contrary to the norm. Correspondingly, “‘The old woman was only an illness.... I was in a hurry to overstep.... I didn't kill a human being, but a principle!’”, as stated in the novel, Raskolnikov has a different moral perspective on humans too. Being a killer, to justify his actions, Raskolnikov considers his victim as “an illness” and “principle”; she was merely a human to him. They both possess distinct views on humans, contrasting the standard…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To begin, St. Petersburg serves as a symbol of the corrupt state of society and its influence on Raskolnikov’s actions. For instance, in the first pages of Crime and Punishment, Raskolnikov describes the atmosphere of St. Petersburg as “terribly hot [...] with an intolerable stench from the taverns, especially numerous in that part of the city, and the drunkards kept running into even though it was a weekday, completed the loathsome and melancholy coloring of the picture” (Dostoevsky 4). In this case, the imagery of the dirty and disorient city of St. Petersburg is a symbol for the current state of society; imperfect, unequal, and full of corruption. The dysfunctional society of St. Petersburg clearly takes a toll on Raskolnikov, as he quickly finds himself poverty-stricken. In a corrupt society where the wealthy thrive and the poor suffer, he has no choice but to resort to crime in order to make ends meet. Similarly, Raskolnikov’s theory of the extraordinary versus the ordinary serves as a symbol of the imbalance of power in society. For instance, social inequality becomes increasingly apparent as Raskolnikov…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raskolinikov is able to forgive himself easier once he has the time to reflect and serve his punishment. After committing the crime Raskolinikov eventually accepts that he must suffer the consequences, by law or by his own mental prowess; "If he has a conscience he will suffer for his mistake. That will be punishment - as well as the prison" (Dostoyevsky 230). The human brain dictates that all actions should have either a logical or emotional purpose, Raskolinikov struggles to find a good enough reason and his mind endures the penalty, until he is properly punished and serves out his sentence in Siberia with a quiet mind and a happy ending with Sonya to look forward…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Raskolnikov's Dream

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Two more characters from the book that show the contrast of Raskolnikov’s personalities are Sonya Marmeladov and Svidrigailov. Sonya is the kindhearted side. She is a prostitute and source of income in her family. Her father drinks away all the money in the family so she is forced to sell her body to provide for her stepmother and siblings. She is compliant and docile. Even if she only had a few copecks left, she would give it to her father who would eventually waste it on more booze. On the other hand, Svidrigailov is the heartless side of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Raskolnikov is ‘exposes’ Luzhin’s motives and yet he wouldn’t want anyone to expose that he murdered the pawnbroker.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people usually do something they look at what’s in it for them or what they’re getting out of it. It is like the book Crime and Punishment, the main character Raskolnikov is killing people for money. Raskolnikov lives a meager life, he is a bitter man that spends his night robbing and sometimes killing people for there money. Raskolnikov spends his night drinking away his sorrow, it is like he is trying to drink away his guilt. He causes people pain buy not only talking away there belonging, but sometimes even taking away their lives. The problem with him always causing people trouble is so that he can get money, the reasons why he’s doing all of this is because he needed the money. At first his life as a robber was just taking people's merchants and making money off of it, until one day while he was in the middle of robbing a store and he had woken up a young child and her mother. Raskolnikov didn't know what to do, he was in a rush and had to get out of the store with the money and didn't care who was in his way, he had to do whatever it would take to get himself out of their. Sadly that had caused the end of 2 lives. Raskolnikov knew what he did was wrong which is why he is a drunk most of the time, he drinks all the time because he is trying to forget all the bad he has done and forget all of the pain that he has caused. He was stealing from people because that is what he lives off of, he…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Raskolnikov believes that “ordinary” people’s purpose is to just exist, in order to form the world and the society. The second group is those who are “extraordinary” and a step above those who are simply ordinary. Raskolnikov cites such “extraordinary men” as Newton, Mahomet, and Napoleon. He tells us that Newton had the right to kill hundreds of men in order to bring to the world knowledge of his findings and to create a new world. They overturned laws and created new ones. They had the right to uphold their new ideals, even if it meant killing innocent men. Therefore Raskolnikov believes that some “extraordinary” humans like him have the right to oppose ordinary social laws in order to create a new social order. Raskolnikov believed that “the first preserve and world and people it, the second move the world and lead it to its goal” (Dostoevsky 227). Raskolnikov also believes that both classes have an equal right to exist. Without “extraordinary” people the human race would be stuck and without the “ordinary” men the efforts and ideas of “extraordinary” men would be nonexistent.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although it’s hard to know what he was like before the novel started, it can be inferred that he wasn’t always insane. Poverty and anger drove a man who used to be a hardworking university student to commit a murder and lose his sanity. From the opening of the book, his paranoia is evident. Raskolnikov seemed to have no other objective besides worrying about the thoughts of others. This paranoia is part of what makes him so impulsive. In many parts of the book, he allows his insanity to think for him. Raskolnikov’s dreams and hallucinations come after the paranoia and impulsiveness. They truly show how alone he is. The real-life connection between sanity and interaction with people is evident in Crime and Punishment. As Raskolnikov begins to talk to people again, his mental state gets better. His mind is at its worst when he is alone. If Raskolnikov had friends to rely on from the beginning, Crime and Punishment might have been a very different…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Insanity in a Sane World

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Holden Caulfield is an insane person in a sane world. What is insanity? Insanity is when you’re in a state of mind that prevents normal perception, behavior or social interaction. This state is mental illness. Insanity is when you do things in deranged or outrageous ways that could frighten people, or make people feel uncomfortable when around you. It’s when you do things out of the ordinary; yet feel as if they are ordinary. Insanity could come about when you’re depressed, or after a traumatic event, and sometimes even by keeping all your feelings bottled up inside of yourself. Sane people are sensible, reliable, well-adjusted and practice sound judgment. It’s behavior that is expected in a society. By these definitions Holden Caulfield is an insane person in a sane world due to his inability to deal with the real world, his obsession with irrelevant details, and his overly judgmental and critical nature. Holden Caulfield is from the book The Catcher and the Rye. By J.D Salinger. Holden Caulfield is the protagonist in the novel and the narrator of the novel.…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stemming from his monomania, this dream reveals Raskolnikov’s view of himself as a Napoleonic figure, or as he calls it, the “extraordinary man.” In the dream, Raskolnikov is back at the pawnbroker’s apartment where the pawnbroker is alive and well. He goes through the motions of murdering the woman once again, but when he steps back after hitting her over the head, he sees her sitting on the floor laughing. Deeply unsettled, he frantically tries to strike the woman on the head over and over again but each blow only produces more laughter. Unlike the dream about the horse, this dream does not emphasize who or what Raskolnikov is. Rather, this dream forces him to confront the faults of his belief by completely doing away with his hopes of surpassing mortal mediocrity. All of the assumptions he had regarding his ability to transcend humanity and avoid responsibility are thrown to the wayside by the events in the dream. The old woman derogates and derides Raskolnikov to the point where he cannot successfully assert his will, which is the hallmark of the extraordinary man. Rather than exuding total power and control, Raskolnikov demonstrates a weakness that is intrinsically human. The dream’s deconstruction of Raskolnikov’s self-perception is what enables him to eventually confess to his crime and open up to love at the prison. By essentially destroying his inflated ego, the…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays