Preview

The United States Should Give To The Poor

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The United States Should Give To The Poor
A lot of people have different ideas of how our nation will succeed. One big idea that people continue to argue about is how our economy should be played out. It's either a good idea to give to the poor to make things fair, or keep your money to yourselves, or maybe it's a good idea to put a cap on the population so we don't have to give to the poor. I believe that we shouldn’t give to the poor because they will use our givings in a negative way, which would make us regret doing goods. Some people such as William Hogarth support the idea of not giving to the poor because they will use their money on something that they shouldn't be. William Hogarth painted a picture which was called "Gin Lane" to support his ideas. Some people such as Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin think that the population is too high to maintain a well kept economy. …show more content…
While others such as Mohandas Gandhi, Dorothea Lange, and Andrew Carnegie think that the ones with more fortune should give to the people who are not as fortunate. Gandhi supported his ideas in an essay called "Economic and Moral Progress." While Lange supported her ideas by taking a picture of a poor family, called "Migrant Mother." Carnegie also supported his ideas in an essay called "The Gospel of Wealth." Then there are people such as Joseph Stiglitz who think that the problem with economy is not the citizens fault. Stiglitz supported his ideas in an essay called "Rent Seeking and the Making of an Unequal
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Essay Compare And Contrast Kuyper And Absolutism
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Essay Compare And Contrast Kuyper And Absolutism

    Over the years, generations have shared different perspectives on the idea of wealth and property. People have discussed the topic several times to explain what is right and wrong. Many agreed on the importance of wealth, while others viewed wealth as a source of evil. The population of Europe, when the Enlightenment occurred, often associated wealth with power. Therefore, the lower classes did not own any power over the government due to their lack of wealth. As the age of Enlightenment refreshed the way people thought, change was noticeable in Europe; however, people were still struggling to solve the problem that the ancient regime left behind. Many great thinkers, philosopher, and politicians were trying to define the problem and explain so people could adjust and understand each other; however, many of the philosopher, theologians did not agree on the results of the Enlightenment. Abraham Kuyper, the Dutch politician and theologian, and Russell H. Conwell, the American Baptist minister and writer, both spent a great amount of time defining and explaining the idea of wealth, poverty, and property for society. Whereas, Kuyper criticizes socialism and argues the…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Conwell's Speech 'Acres Of Diamonds'
    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing Conwell's Speech 'Acres Of Diamonds'

    His message is that we shouldn't reduce our level of thinking to think like the great people and that the great trades are somewhere else. Take Henry Ford for example. He started scheming and constructing his car on his farm. And then what? He created the legendary Ford company and made the factories in the unchanged area where he had been raised. Dearborn, Michigan was not special, until he made it. He did it without leaving his own property . There are countless “rags to riches” stories out…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    "Nickel and Dimed" Essay on the statement "There are no secret economies that nourish the poor; on the contrary, there are a host of special costs."
    • 1072 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Nickel and Dimed" Essay on the statement "There are no secret economies that nourish the poor; on the contrary, there are a host of special costs."

    " There are no secret economies that nourish the poor; on the contrary, there are a host of special cost", meaning that there isn't any help for the poor but yet they have to pay for everything they need and have. Although it may be true in some cases but I disagree with the statement. The reason why I disagree is because it all depends on the person's situation. As for Barbara Ehrenreich she bases it on her co-workers life on how some struggle just get by without support. Unfortunately they are in a bad position where they are not able to receive support from others around them or simply because they're not motivated enough to do something about it and move on.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Modest Proposal A Satire
    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Modest Proposal A Satire

    We still see today beggars whilst we go and come back from certain places. Mexico a very familiar country close to us is an example, although there is many people in Mexico making a good living, there is also people living in the streets with no homes. When crossing the border to enter back into our city of Laredo we still see people holding their plastic or foam cups towards us in hope of getting any change or money and most of the times they don't end up making enough to support their loved ones financially everyday. Although, Mexico is one of the many examples of places that suffer from mild poverty there is still a great quantity of other locations that deal with extreme scarcity. The most common places that deal with this include India, South-East Asia, Africa and South America. Amongst these common places we also find contrastive groups that undergo poverty such as homeless, fringe dwellers, the unemployed, single parents and those who are brought into a life where their family don't make enough money. Our poor still to this day are still at a great disadvantage and Jonathan Swift was one of the few, great people who wanted to support his country and try to do something to get attention to relieve the…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tommie Shelby's 'The Plight Of The Poor'
    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tommie Shelby's 'The Plight Of The Poor'

    Many critics of the poor believe that they should take personal responsibility for their substandard living conditions; they only live in these conditions because of their own life choices and poor attitudes. However, according to Tommie Shelby’s Justice, Deviance, and the Dark Ghetto, the social conditions of the poor are due to failure of the government and affluent citizens to improve the underprivileged lives of the ghetto poor. If a person is criticized for turning down a menial job at low wages and applying for small welfare payments instead, Shelby would argue that the critic should not demand labor from those who do not receive the same benefits as the rest of society, because the social system is inequitable. In a fair system of social cooperation, there is reciprocity between people who regard each other as equals (page 127). This should be taken into consideration when criticizing the poor. Why should they be expected to play their part in social cooperation if they do not get to receive the same benefits? The poor are clearly not regarded as equal, in terms of granted opportunities, to a person from a higher class in society.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The True Gospel of Wealth: Andrew Carnegie.
    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The True Gospel of Wealth: Andrew Carnegie.

    “The poor enjoy what the rich could not before afford. What were the luxuries have become the necessities of life. The laborer has now more comforts than the farmer had a few generations ago.”…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Diamonds Are A Man's Best Friend Conwell
    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Diamonds Are A Man's Best Friend Conwell

    In the passage Conwell states, “ Money is power, and you ought to be reasonably ambitious to have it.” I do believe that in our world today that money is powerful. Without money it would be hard to have everyday essentials and luxuries. But unlike Conwell I think that money can not stop you from doing good in life. In the text it states; “You ought because you can do more good with it than you could without it.” You don't need money to do good deeds. You could help others, cheer people up when they are in a bad mood and you could volunteer. Although money can be help with good deeds, it does not mean it is the only way to do…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor - Garrett Hardin What Should A Billionaire Give-and What Should You? - Peter Singer
    • 3390 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor - Garrett Hardin What Should A Billionaire Give-and What Should You? - Peter Singer

    One of the most important issues facing the world today is the issue of the poor. There are many things that can be done about this issue, however much of the world is torn between wanting to help and not knowing how to go about it. This is the issue that is presented in the two essays - Garrett Hardin’s “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor,” and Peter Singer’s “What Should A Billionaire Give-and What Should You?” Garrett Hardin was an ecologist who warned of the dangers of overpopulation. In his article, he argues that our first obligation is to ourselves and our posterity and that we would be foolish to let rich nations share their surplus with poor nations. He believes that in a world with a growing population such sharing would do no good, “it would only overload the environment and lead to demands for still greater assistance in the future” (Hardin, Pg. 80). On the other hand, Peter Singer takes the view that people in affluent countries ought to stop spending their money on luxuries and begin giving that money to aid the world’s poor. He believes that all lives have equal value no matter where they are being led, and that we are very far from acting in accordance with that belief. Both Hardin and Singer have Utilitarian views on this subject pointing out the consequences for society. While Singer makes many good points throughout his article, at the end of the day I believe that Hardin provides a better analysis of the situation. Hardin’s point is the more persuasive and the stronger of the two articles, due to his many real world examples and his vivid lifeboat metaphor.…

    • 3390 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry George The Crime Of Poverty Summary
    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry George The Crime Of Poverty Summary

    He says we can accomplish this by “abolishing taxes that now rest on the capital, labour, and improvements, and raising all our public revenues by the taxation of land values”. He argues that America had not fully abolished slavery; they had only abolished one form of it, which was chattel slavery. His main point that he argues is the absurdity of land ownership. He says that American’s treatment of land lies at the bottom of all social questions. He addresses the fact that when one pays for land, they are paying for something that no man has produced. This is unlike any other purchase because people labor to produce other items, but not land. He also argues that Americans had things reversed because the rich people should have earned their wealth by working themselves, but instead they have the poor people labor while the rich reap the benefits. George asserts that it is ridiculous that a dead man can own a part of the earth and give it away to whomever he pleases. This is unnecessary because the earth, Henry says, was made for the living, not the dead. He also says that poverty is not from God, but it…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gospel of Wealth: Debate
    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gospel of Wealth: Debate

    Carnegie believed that the inequality of wealth in society showed that the rich were superior, and worked hard to achieve their wealth. On the other hand, poor people chose not to work hard. And therefore were poor. This was the condition of a free society, where people were free to work hard to gain wealth, or free to starve.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    America's Obligation To Help The Poor
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    America's Obligation To Help The Poor

    Did you know that many people around the world are suffering due to lack of resources within their countries? Some wealthier people and nations decide not to help these less fortunate people as they would rather spend money on frivolous things and think that it’s not their obligation. I believe that man has a moral obligation to help those less fortunate than him, though I believe that it is not morally right to only help those who are less fortunate just to make you feel like a better person.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Locke of Poor Reform and Workhouses
    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Locke of Poor Reform and Workhouses

    According to Locke, a major factor in the high numbers of poor is the fact that they are simply idle or lazy and do not want to work hard in order to attain money or land. For some citizens, things of this nature come automatically due to inheritances and things of that nature and presents Locke with a parallel of poor with no means of moving up and the rich with any intent of sharing the wealth and / or knowledge. Rather than poor people, idleness seems to be the root of…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Morality and Deeper Moral Meaning
    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Morality and Deeper Moral Meaning

    It is said that [Robin Hood] fought against the looting rulers and returned the loot to those who had been robbed, but that is not the meaning of the legend which has survived. He is remembered, not as a champion of property, but as a champion of need, not as a defender of the robbed, but as a provider of the poor. He is held to be the first man who assumed a halo of virtue by practicing charity with wealth which he did not own, by giving away goods which he had not produced, by making others pay for the luxury of his pity. He is the man who became the symbol of the idea that need, not achievement, is the source of rights, that we don’t have to produce, only to want, that the earned does not belong to us, but the unearned does. He became a justification for every mediocrity who, unable to make his own living, has demanded the power to dispose of the property of his betters, by proclaiming his willingness to devote his life to his inferiors at the price of robbing his superiors. It is this foulest of creatures — the double-parasite who lives on the sores of the poor and the blood of the rich — whom men have come to regard as a moral ideal. And this has brought us to a world where the more a man produces, the closer he comes to the loss of all his rights, until, if his ability is great enough, he becomes a rightless creature delivered as prey to any claimant — while in order to be placed above rights, above principles, above morality, placed where anything is permitted to him, even plunder and murder, all a man has to do is be in need. Do you wonder why the world is collapsing around us? That is what I am fighting… Until…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie- The Gospel of Wealth
    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Carnegie- The Gospel of Wealth

    Andrew Carnegie had liberal thoughts, as expressed in his Gospel of Wealth. I agree with the issues addressed in the Gospel of Wealth, such as giving your money away before you die, to further society. The purpose was to give the money away before you die, so you can regulate where the money goes, and that you can assure yourself that it will go to a worthy cause.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Utopia Quotes
    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Utopia Quotes

    “Where everyone tries to get clear title to whatever he can scrape together, then however abundant things are a few men divide everything up among themselves, leaving everyone else in poverty.” (47)…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics