Where politicians came from also had a huge influence on their views. Those from the South favored the use of slaves while those from the North opposed it. When it came to deciding whether incoming states would be free or slave states, conflict arose. The Southern states were concerned that if another free state was added, that their candidates would be more likely to lose elections, and vice versa. Finally, the Missouri compromise was brought about which physically drew a line through the country at 36 30. All states above would be free, and all below would be slave states. Cleary, this led to a severe case of sectionalism; the country was divided amongst slave states and free states. With such sectional differences, unity was impossible, despite the fact that only Jeffersonians existed.
Another factor which effected the nation’s unity was the court. Since John Adams appointed “midnight judges” to the Supreme Court during the final hours of his presidency, Federalist influence still lingered throughout the court, specifically with John Marshall. Marshall was certainly not a Jeffersonian as he constantly sought to strengthen the court and the Federal government with his rulings. During the case of Marbury vs. Madison, he successfully strengthened the court by stating that the final say of what is constitutional belongs to the court. This began the practice of judicial review. In the case of McCulloch vs. Maryland, Madison limited state power forbidding states from overriding constitutional law. Many a Jeffersonian opposed his rulings as they believed that power should lie within the states and that the Federal government should not have too much strength. Obviously, Marshall’s court led to division after the war of 1812.
However, the fact that the Jeffersonian Republicans were now the only political party alone is a good basis to how the country was more united after the War of 1812. Unity like this was unheard of in the United States prior to this time. For the first time, there appeared to be no political factions, causing the Era of Good Feelings. A sense of nationalism was adopted by Americans as well and unity certainly seemed to be present.
Although the country became unified in many trivial ways after the War of 1812, for the most part, the United States actually became more divided. Yes, single party rule existed, but this did not mean that all within the party were truly loyal to the ways of Jefferson, but were merely conforming to stay in the running for future elections. Because of this, sectionalism emerged and Marshall’s court provided further political detachment, making the United States a very divided nation after the War of 1812.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Constitution can be interpreted in many different ways, which leads to sectional discord and tension. For many reasons, the South did not like what the constitution said. There were many conflictions with the compromise of 1850, map shown in (Document A) and the fugitive slave act. Certain Northerners were against slavery and the fugitive slave act that they even posted warnings for the slaves. (Document C). This fugitive slave act also helped drive the tension deeper into the United States.…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Prior to the war of 1812, the United States was riddled with domestic political conflicts between the Federalist and Republican parties and diplomatic conflicts with Britain and France. The Federalist and Republicans’ opinions differed in every subject and diplomatic policies against Britain and France divided the nation. At one point, disunion was so apparent that during the Hartford Convention in 1814, New England almost seceded from the Union. After the war of 1812, from 1815 to 1825, some Historians claimed that the nation embraced an Era of Good Feelings due to the destruction of the Federalist Party (but not its ideas) and the numerous nationalistic improvements. However, a better name for the post war years of 1815 to 1825 is an Era of Mixed Feelings because although there were improvements stimulated by nationalism, there were also conflicts created by sectionalism.…
- 1163 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the major exports of the south is cotton, and while the north invested in factories and railroads, they invested in slaves to tend to their crops. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 stated that all territories about the 36’30 line must enter as free states, and all territories below must enter as slave. They also enter as pairs, one free/one slave, to keep balance. Many inventions, such as the Cotton Gin, led to an increased need for slaves. All the while, the North was moving away from slavery for both moral and economic reasons. Popular Sovereignty allowed citizens of each new territory to vote and decide if their area would be slave or free.…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Change occurs in every time period. Today Americans work and communicate faster through home computers and cell phones than they did thirty years earlier. Change also occurred early in the nineteenth century. After General Andrew Jackson led the United States victory at New Orleans, nationalism increased and Americans looked forward with confidence to a future filled with changes. They would not be disappointed. The years after the War of 1812 produced great economic and political changes.…
- 941 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The compromise stated that above the 36’30’ parallel was a free state and anything below it would be a slave state (Silverman). The Missouri Compromise only created more division of ideas between the North and the South. Northerners did not believe that geography should dictate whether slavery was legal, whereas the south believed that there should still be slavery all over the United States. Although this 36’30 compromise was first agreed on by both the North and South, the South had other plans about territory during this…
- 2426 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The changing nation reflected a growing sense of national pride in the United States during the Era of Good Feelings when United States citizens had a gleaming sense of nationalism and didn’t really care what the government did, The Age of Jackson when lower class citizens were just happy to have a president that wasn’t from a rich family. Lastly, State’s rights and the Economy not only brought people together due to the states gaining power but it also drew citizens further apart because not everyone liked the idea of a national bank. In the United States after the War of 1812, everyone had a large sense of nationalism because the British were defeated again. The United States was finally being seen as a threat or an actual country and the…
- 1591 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
With the War of 1812 concluded as a stalemate through the Treaty of Ghent, America turned its focus off the foreign policy main frame for a while and instead centered on the domestic agenda. The aftereffects of the War of 1812 were initially great indeed; the decision of antebellum status quo disgraced the Federalist Party by displaying their lack of any gain from the war. Further worsening the Federalists’ cause, news of the Hartford Convention surfaced, revealing the party’s near secession from the Union due to war-related hardships New England faced. The party disintegrated, and the once bitter bi-partisan feud between the Federalists and Jeffersonian Democrats abated, leaving the…
- 906 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
With the adoption of the Missouri Compromise in 1820 they felt they had found their solution. The Compromise established lands west of the Mississippi and below latitude 36 degrees 30’ as land permitting slavery and all lands north of that line to be free, (this did not include Missouri). There had to be an equal number of slave states in the South as non-slave-holding states. Also, the two regions had to have equal representation in the Senate.…
- 1113 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The Missouri Compromise passed in 1820 that passed a rule that prohibited slavery in states from the former Louisiana Purchase and Main. Leaving Missouri and west of it slave states. Which later on the Southern believed that slavery would be under attack and began to build arguments to protect it.…
- 874 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
slave state, while also adding Maine to the nation as a free state to maintain balance. However, this compromise also states that any state north of the Mason-Dixon line, “contemplated by this act, slavery and involuntary servitude, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes, whereof the parties shall have been duly convicted, shall be, and is hereby, forever prohibited.” It effectively divided the country by geography, and it indirectly splits people into a demographic.…
- 1066 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Northerners were against adding Missouri to the union as slave state because it would disrupt the balance of power in congress between slave and free states; Missouri should be a free state but Missouri wanted to come in as a slave state. This gave a new set up to the states and came up with the 36’30 line, an imaginary line was drawn across the southern border of Missouri. Any future added north to the line would be free and any future state on the southern side would be slave. This gives birth to the idea of sectionalism, loyalty to the state rather than to the whole…
- 473 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Edward J. Larson analyzes the pivotal presidential election, sometimes referred to as a revolution, of 1800 that established two disparate political parties, challenged the United States Constitution, and threatened the nation’s unity. Because this was the first time in American history that partisan campaigning was distinctly apparent, it was a significant piece of the election of 1800. When establishing the opposing campaigns of 1800, the article states, “…divided Americans into two distinct partisan camps: the Federalist of President John Adams and Alexander Hamilton –ideological ancestors of modern Republicans- versus the Republicans, or the future Democrats.” Here it is not only giving information on the situation of the fourth presidential election, but the situation that set the precedent for presidential elections to come. Even “207 years later”, as Larson writes, the political breach on policies and ideas shapes the government of the United States. The election of 1800 included the race between the following candidates: Thomas Jefferson, Aaron Burr, Alexander Hamilton and Charles Pinckney. After all the votes were calculated “Jefferson and Burr had 73 votes each.” The election ended in a tie between two members of the same party. As an immediate result of the election’s initial outcome, the Constitution was put to the test. The voting process in place by the Constitution showed its faults with the changing bipartisan mentality of America. This newly discovered weakness “led to the adoption of the 12th Amendment to the US Constitution.” This amendment prevented a repeat of the election of 1800 by making voting for president and vice president separate. Never again could tie be caused by equal voting by a party. Here the government adapted to the changing fundamentals of the partisan politics of the United States; it shows concern for the good people. In referring to the election of 1800 Larson concludes by making the claim…
- 491 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the year 1820, congress passed a law called the “Missouri Compromise”. This law stated: any state below the border of Missouri that wanted to join the Union would be a slave state, and any state above the Missouri border would be a free state. The law also allowed anyone to cross either side of the border to capture African Americans and sell them back into slavery. When the Missouri Compromise was passed,there were three states above the border that were already slave states, and the law allowed those states to keep slavery. There were several reasons why the Missouri Compromise gave the South an advantage over the North.…
- 421 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A few decades after America won its freedom, unity was much desired amongst populous. Disunity usually occurs with two people or parties with different points of view, value systems, or class opinion clash; that is exactly what took place in the early 19th century America. Political parties hindered the development of national unity in the United States between 1790 and 1840 because of party polarity and sectionalism.…
- 313 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The War of 1812, often regarded by historians as the second American Revolution brought about significant changes. With the end of the war, the United States became less involved in European affairs and devoted more energy into its internal development. This period of internal development led to the emergence of nationalism and sectionalism.…
- 1233 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays