Preview

The United Nations and Control of Weapons of Mass Destructions: a Study of Iran’s Nuclear Power Development Project.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The United Nations and Control of Weapons of Mass Destructions: a Study of Iran’s Nuclear Power Development Project.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY
Power acquisition has become an integral part of international relations and to that extent generates conflict. As the days go by, more conflict will be ravaging the world and the concomitant effects of which have been destruction of lives and property. The most alarming is the means through which these conflicts are carried out, that is the nature and character of weapons applied during such conflict, as a matter of fact, Brown (2006) was of the opinion that conflict must occur as far as there are nations inter-play at the centre stage of world politics. Accordingly, what is most alarming is the means through which such conflicts are carried out.

In buttressing these fact, Danladi (1999) reiterated that the use of force of nuclear weapons during armed conflicts have not only reduced the world’s population but also, set the entire world ablaze on strategic and nuclear war. The magnitude of Iran’s nuclear proliferation has become a big worry to the United State and the International community at large especially on the construction of the Bushehr nuclear power plant, the restriction of IAEA inspectors’ access to Parchin site where the IAEA believes high explosives research pertinent to nuclear weapons may have taken place. Iran continued to install thousands of additional centrifuges in its main enrichment plant at Natanz and in a smaller facility at Fordow buried deep underground.

Consequently, the United States did not fold its hands in ensuring the fight against the proliferation of nuclear weapons especially as it concerns Iran. The United States has been mobilizing forces against Iran to frustrate their nuclear weapon ambition. Iran became a signatory of the Non- proliferation treaty (NPT) in 1968 and in 1986; the USSR signed a nuclear technology co-operation agreement with Iran.

Furthermore, the protocol was expanded in 1992 when two intergovernmental agreements were signed with Russia: One for nuclear

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Iran's Nuclear Program

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…

    • 1439 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first critical piece of foreign policy done by the Carter administration was the passing of the SALT II treaty later in the administration. It was the first treaty that successfully passed after these talks, and it stated, “Declaring their intention to undertake in the near future negotiations further to limit and further to reduce strategic offensive arms.” (The Government of the United States) The treaty was explicit in demanding the reduction of all aspects of the Soviet Union and United States’ nuclear capability. In addition, it was the result of mutual understanding, which is contained in the full title of the treaty resulting from both nations comprehending the dangers of large nuclear arsenals. Continuing,…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: CNN World. (2003, January 10). Retrieved from Nuclear Weapons: North Korea Leaves Nuclear Pact: http://articles.cnn.com…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The existence of nuclear weapons for better or worse have indubitably impacted our lives in one way or the other. There are the some who find these weapons to be singularly beneficial. For example Defence Analyst Edward Luttwak said “we have lived since 1945 without another world war precisely because rational minds…extracted a durable peace from the very terror of nuclear weapons.” (Luttwak, 1983). Moreover, Robert Art and Kenneth Waltz both extrapolate that “the probability of war between American and Russia or between NATO and the Warsaw Pact is practically nil precisely because the military planning and deployments of each, together with the fear of escalation to general nuclear war, keep it that way.” (Art, Waltz, 1983) Yet there are many who also share the view of Jonathan Schell who dramatically infers that if we, society, do not “rise up and cleanse the earth of nuclear weapons, we will “sink into the final coma and end it all.” (Schell, 1982) The central purpose of this essay is to challenge the conventional wisdom about nuclear proliferation; that nuclear weapons do indeed induce a greater stability amongst international politics however this does not justify countries to continue nuclear arms proliferation with seemingly no endless bounds. However despite this it is naïve to declare that a world without nuclear weapons would be without peace either. Nuclear weapons are more than just symbols of destruction and chaos but however hold far more important roles in international politics. They are at the forefront of national security and hold considerable importance in domestic debates and internal bureaucratic struggles and serve as international normative symbols of modernity and identity and as such have to be treated with utmost care and with a sense of supreme responsibility by countries that hold them.…

    • 2181 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iran’s nuclear program and nuclear weapons have grown exponentially since 2003 threatening Middle-Eastern countries and America. Iran has had a nuclear program since the 1950’s when the U.S. helped launch it as part of the Atoms For Peace program. But since then, the program has grown with out regulation from the I.A.E.A.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nuclear weapons have only ever been used once in human history, and that was during World War II when The United States deployed missiles on Japanese territory, in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. At the time of bombing in 1945 only the USA had developed nuclear weapons, whilst today the pool of states consisting of nuclear weapons is still extremely small, with only nine states laying claim to nuclear technology and weaponry. This nuclear proliferation is explained by Darryl Howlett who explains this as the worldwide spread of nuclear weapons. For Howlett states are nuclear driven because of the ‘strategic, political and prestige benefits’ attached to nuclear weapons[1]. In the modern world the mass media are often critical about nuclear weapons and the threats they pose for society, but this begs the question; why have nuclear weapons not been used in conflict since 1945? To answer this question the issues of taboo and deterrence and the arrival of virtual nuclear arsenals must be called into question, as well as theoretical ideas such as rationality from proliferation optimists and proliferation pessimists. I will also look at whether we currently live in a non-proliferation regime, and look at the alternatives for peace and nuclear non-usage.…

    • 2145 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Squassoni, S. (20 JUL 2006). Iran 's Nuclear Program: Recent Developments. Washington, D.C.: LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON DC CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    -Both states continued building massive numbers of nuclear weapons, and new technologies such as MIRVs limited the effectiveness of the treaties.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alliance: Cold War Essay

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. ‘Ideological differences played little part in the origin of the Cold War.’ How far do you agree with this judgment? (2000)…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1969: Negotiations between the United Nations and the Soviet Union begin on the reduction of strategic nuclear weapons. The talks end with several treaties in 1979, but the arms race continues unabated.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The fear of nuclear devastation has so far created peace and prevented a third world war. Rather than weapons of war, strategic weapons are becoming weapons of intimidation used to influence political and strategic outcomes. The actual likelihood of a nuclear warhead being used becomes slimmer by the day, with non-proliferation treaties, campaigns such as ‘Ground Zero’ and regulations on transporting nuclear weapons becoming stricter and stricter. The publication of a volume edited by…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lettow, Paul Vorbeck. 2010 Strengthening the nuclear nonproliferation regime. New York Council on forgein Relations. Print…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, the fear of a nuclear conflict that arose between the two superpowers after the event of the Cuban Missile Crisis. This led to one of the earliest agreements on nuclear arms control which included the Nuclear Test-Ban Treaty in 1963 (“Détente and Arms Control”). The formal agreements made between the two superpowers assured the security of the people against a possible nuclear attack which benefited both sides. Further negotiations continued with the Conference on Security and Cooperation. They emerged with an act that “recognized political borders, established military confidence building measures, created opportunities for trade and cultural exchange, and promoted human rights” (“Détente and Arms Control”). It presented both sides willingness to agree upon economic, and humanitarian solutions regarding the tensions between them. However, the era of Detente came to an unsatisfying halt. Public dissatisfaction and the continued competition increasingly manifested as they further intervene in the third World (“Détente and Arms Control”). It ended in a stalled progress on arms control and brought them back to the brink of confrontation. In conclusion, Detente was an event that showed vast improvements in the use of aid to create common…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A national defense program was thought of after the Nazis sent hundreds of V-2 rockets during the end of World War II (Garamone 78). President Nixon came up with a National Missile Defense Program, but many critics thought this was useless, because no nation had the capability of delivering a ballistic missile to the United States (Anderson 1). A well-functioning system was well out of reach, and large costs for its development were one factor in stopping the program from taking affect (Anderson 3). Only the United States allies had the capabilities, and all of the United States’ allies were against a missile defense program (Anderson 1). Something needed to be done to ensure the safety of the United States citizens. It was on May 26, 1972 that the United States and the Soviets signed the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty (Anderson 2; “History” 1).…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays