Preview

The Tragedy of the Commons/Out of Sight & Out of Mind: a New Oceanic Imperialism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2254 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Tragedy of the Commons/Out of Sight & Out of Mind: a New Oceanic Imperialism
The Tragedy of the Commons/Out of Sight & Out of Mind: A New Oceanic Imperialism

Overview:
In the first article, Garrett Hardin attempts to assert that there is no universal solution to the population problem. His supports this central thesis be explaining that in a world that has finite resources, the population must inherently also be finite. He also declares that the optimum population is less than the maximum. In order to take full advantage of each individuals potential, it is necessary to maximize “good per person” (which is a relative phrase; and to measure the values of the goods, a weighting system would have to be implemented).
The philosophical tragedy of the commons occurs when individuals overuse (for their personal benefit) the commons to the point where it impedes on the use and future use of others and future generations. This overuse also leads to devaluation. Hardin proposed an analogy of a field “open to all,” in which common ownership leads to environmental degradation. In terms of pollution, the problem of the commons deals with adding to the commons rather than taking from the commons.
The natural tendency of man (at the individual level) is to justify their actions based on the cost saving that could arise from for instance polluting, instead of having their waste properly disposed of. This micro view of the problem leads to aggregate problems for the entire population because if each person resorts to such actions, the commons (as a result of pollution for example) will be drastically over-polluted and ineffectual for all. Hardin describes a potential solution to the problem of the commons which utilizes administrative law coupled with temperance and morality (relative to the times).
The author’s next critical assertion is that a given population should restrict the freedom to breed. He exclaims that if every family in society were required to provide for their children and home without any government intervention



Cited: Hardin, Garrett. "The Tragedy of the Commons by Garrett Hardin - The Garrett Hardin Society - Articles." The Garrett Hardin Society. Web. 31 Oct. 2010. <http://www.garretthardinsociety.org/articles/art_tragedy_of_the_commons.html>. Skaldany, Mike, Ben Belton, and Rebecca Clausen. "Out of Sight & Out of Mind A New Oceanic Imperialism." Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy | Where Global and Local Meet Sustainability. Web. 31 Oct. 2010. <http://www.iatp.org/tradeobservatory/library.cfm?refID=48537>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    References: Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2004). BLUE OCEAN STRATEGY. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 76-84.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Read the Case Study, “Intergovernmental Relations and Ocean Policy Change: 1971-85” in Chapter Nine of Public Policy: An Evolutionary Approach. In a two page paper:…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Water Treatment FRQ

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    d) Another commons is the rangeland in the western United States. This federally owned land is open for grazing to the public for privately owned cattle and other livestock. Overgrazing in those areas is a huge problem. Everyone wants to use them but…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The tragedy of commons is when people share a common resource they tend to deplete is because of self-interest and for a short term profit.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Garrett Hardin’s essay, Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor, Hardin describes the wealthy population of the world as being in a single lifeboat that is almost filled until buckling while the poor population of the world treads water below. Hardin’s essay gets his readers to feel the natural instinct to survive. The lifeboat metaphor that Hardin uses relieves the wealthy population of their moral obligations to the less fortunate, but in addition, puts all of the blame and cause of the depletion of earth’s resources on the poor. As much as his argument may make sense, there are some flaws in his way of thinking. Alan Durning, who noticed that major flaws with Hardin’s essay, wrote on what he thought about the topic that Hardin has brought to his attention. In Durning’s essay, Asking How Much Is Enough, he argues that it is not overpopulation that is depleting the earth’s resources, but overconsumption of the resources by the wealthy population. The arguments in Durning’s essay makes the reader realize that the way Hardin uses the metaphorical lifeboat to persuade his readers into thinking the same thing as he does and shows that Hardin wrongly places the blame of all of earth’s financial stability problems on the poorer population.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He states that growth should satisfy the utilitarian principles. Here, Mill distinguishes the individual utility and social utility, defining social utility as an ultimate guard of justice in the society. However, he continues to favor that choices are essentially individually based and it should be the individual utility that governs the economic flows. Hunt, with greater reforming spirit, seriously opposes the individualistic nature of utility and choice-making calculus. He writes that the individualistic approach not only keeps utility as an practically immeasurable, subjective existence, but also ignores the fact that individual choices are, to a large extent, socially informed. Because the utility is subjective and personally oriented, desire and pleasure are indistinguishable, and the consequence of wealth redistribution is incalculable as the losses and gains of groups may be unknown. The group’s interests, meanwhile, reflect the social influence of making a personal decision. Hunt’s observation expanded upon Mill’s allusion to the personal experience. The choices are somehow restrictive to the available resources in a bounded environment and the direction that a society is taking. Therefore, Hunt recognizes the influential social impact of individual choices while deeming the individualistic and subjective measure of utility useless and conflicting. He takes…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Hardin's " Tragedy of the Commons," and Diamonds, "The World as Polder: What Does it Mean to Us Today?," One can see how Hardin's main points relate to Diamonds, because both dissect the unsustainable aspects of our society. Both authors use different methods to get their point across, however their main points are very similar. Although Diamond closely looks at past societal collapses, and what aspects of their society caused their collapses, Hardin's current view of the modern worlds unsustainable population, has many characteristic to the older society's that Diamond discusses in his essay. For example Hardin look at our increasing population and how we are over indulging in our resources, that will soon run out if we're not careful. While on the other hand, Diamond describes how over population was a major reason for the Easter Islanders collapse.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Garret Hardin was Professor Emeritus of Biology at the University of California – Santa Barbara, and considered himself to be a human ecologist who wrote, lectured, and taught about this subject. His most famous essay is “The Tragedy of the Commons,” published in 1968; the ideas in this essay resurface in “Lifeboat Ethics.” In the article “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor,” Garrett Hardin argues that wealthy nations should not help poor nations by using the combinations of logos and pathos. He uses three writing tactics: lifeboat metaphor, population statistics, and critiques of other potential solutions.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lifeboat Ethics

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “In a crowded world of less than perfect human beings, mutual ruin is inevitable if there are no controls. This is the tragedy of the commons” (Hardin 3). The tragedy of the commons is a perfect…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Deer Hunting Tragedy

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page

    The tragedy of the commons explain how a resource or resources are shared by many individuals but there is no particular person that has access to claim any part of the resource, other than for personal gain. Because the resources are open to the public, it’s considered to be “fair game”. A good example of what would be considered the tragedy of the commons would be deer hunting. Deer hunting is a lucrative hobby. Many people today deer hunt for a hobby but the economical side of it has increased as well, as more and more restaurants and stores are selling deer meat. Because the forests and other heavily populated areas that house deers are not privately owned, this allows for more people to chime in on this low-key money making trait, making…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy Of The Commons

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Hardin’s paper about the problem in the commons he discusses the psychological thought process of the citizens of the world based upon the ideal of freedom. This freedom leads to individuals doing what is best for them with commons regardless of the consequences to the commons or other individuals using it. He then uses personal temperance as one of the many solutions to the exploitation of the commons. Temperance in his explanation is the ability to take only what one needs from the…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tragedy of the Commons

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Critique Paper- Tragedy of the Commons In G. Hardin’s (1968) article, “Tragedy of the Commons”, he discussed the problem that exists because of man’s attempt to exploit the earth through rapid population expansion, and how he only harm himself since almost everyone adopts the same strategy. He also emphasized that the tragedy brought about by overpopulation seemed to have no technical solution, and its solution seemed to lie only upon the conscience of man, since it is he who decides upon his own fertility. He also discussed the similar problem of pollution, and implicitly elaborated how externalities arise due to the ill-defined property rights. He also commented on the effects of conscience to future circumstances, on how social arrangements construct coercion upon the mind of whom rules are applied to, and concluded the article by stating that commons could not persist as a social arrangement in situation of overpopulation. I agree to most of the arguments Hardin presented on the article. He was able to establish a good line of reasoning which encompasses problems and suggestions from which solutions to the problem of overpopulation could be derived. Here, I will focus on the aspect of necessary social arrangements so that the problem of commons could be solved. Take the Philippines as an example. In so far birth control and reproductive health bills are concerned, not much progress has been achieved because of several factors affecting the environment of the bill. Many institutions, such as the Churh, has a big influence upon the path which will be taken by the people. We cannot say that the nation will move as one in this debate, since everyone has different opinion on the value of natural resources, environment, health, life and so many other things involved in the milieu of a birth control or reproductive health bill. The legislators themselves have conflicting opinions toward such a bill, which on the very first place makes it hard for them to settle on a…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In regards to natural resource management, Leopold, gives a new perspective with his land ethic. There has been an on going struggle between the traditional utilitarianism and the non-utilitarianism beliefs. What Aldo Leopold does is combine certain aspects of both sides to find common ground amongst the bicentric and the anthropocentric views. (Knight, A New Century 113)…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prisoner's dilemma

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages

    References: •Kollocks, P.(1990) Governing The Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Retrieved 3/11/14 from<http://www.cooperationcommons.com/node/361>.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Garrett Hardin first wrote “The Tragedy of the Commons”, and was published in his Journal in 1968, and it is one of the big issue World today face. He has mention tragedy of Common as exploitation of human on the environment without accounting externalities. He has given example on four herdsmen. It generally takes place from agriculture revolution and it proceeding even in post-industrial revolution whereby Hardin have concern on it. This means that common take more advantage from common resources over private. As four herdsmen who share one pastures land, this is not suitable in post-industrial revolution because he explain about the depleting human resources that time whereas it is more concern with pollution that human activities have…

    • 2778 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays