Preview

The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
152 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony is put in a difficult situation. Antony, Caesar’s right hand man, wants to persuade the people to stand up and fight on the side of Caesar. Antony fears that the people may not side with him, but side with Brutus and the conspirators. He moves the people though by gaining their trust, casting doubts upon the conspirators, and inspiring the Roman citizens. The beginning of his speech is to make a friendship with all the commoners, because, before Antony, Brutus persuades the people that killing Caesar is best for Rome. Antony persuades the feelings of the people by first calling them his friends. By doing this, he makes the people of Rome feel like they are in his class. Antony soon follows
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Betrayal Quotes
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Betrayal Quotes

    After the assassination of Caesar, Brutus explains his reasons for committing such an act. Antony deceives Brutus into believing that Antony understood their reasons and would join them as an ally. By becoming a supposed ally, Antony gains the advantage of trust, as Brutus trusts him to speak at Caesar’s funeral. At Caesar’s funeral, Antony goes against Brutus’ trust, and reveals Caesar’s will, and incites the plebeians to come to the conclusion that Caesar had been a good man, and that Brutus was in the wrong. Antony reveals his true intentions when he says to himself, “Mischief thou art afoot; / Take thou what course thou wilt” (III. iii. 275-276). Antony had taken advantage of the trust bestowed upon him by pulling off a brilliant act on his part, that effectively persuaded Brutus. Not only that, Antony also takes advantage of the trust that the plebeians had given him. His ulterior motives are revealed when he criticizes Lepidus’ ability to stand besides them and asks, “Is it fit, / The threefold world divided, he should stand / One of the three to share it?” (IV. i. 15-17). This shows how Antony has no intention of fulfilling his promise made to the plebeians to uphold Caesar’s will. Instead, he wants to gain power for himself, and gets rid of Brutus and the other conspirators to get his way. He had acted as a perfect friend/ally to the plebeians as he acted to Brutus, and he also took advantage of them as well.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tragic Heroes In Julius Caesar
    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Tragic Heroes In Julius Caesar

    There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Mark Antony Rhetorical Devices
    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Julius Caesar's Funeral Mark Antony Rhetorical Devices

    In his speech during Caesar's funeral, Mark Antony tries to persuade the Plebeians that what the conspirators did to Caesar was not acceptable and something must be done, and this creates a critical and disappointed tone. During the beginning of Antony’s speech, he established his main ideas, and showed that he was different from Brutus. In fact, his first line, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears”(3.2.82) tells a lot. Antony uses the word “friends” first, and this differs from Brutus because he said “Romans” first. This shows what Antony thinks is most important, which is friendship.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony Rhetorical Analysis
    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark Antony Rhetorical Analysis

    Mark Antony deftly speaks to his audience in a way that requires them to challenge their preconceived characterizations of Brutus and Cassius. He intentionally expresses the deliberate opposite of what he genuinely wishes and excessively compliments the people to the point that they forget their own seemingly unwavering convictions. His finesse and dexterity in bending words and minds ultimately works to his favor. Antony accomplishes his initial goal to convince the Roman people to revenge Caesar’s demise. This achievement in and of itself exhibits…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives
    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Julius Caesar Conflicting Perspectives

    He delivers a convincing speech on how the assassination was just and was for the benefit of Rome. The sheepish commoners are easily satisfied by this explanation and when Antony arrives he has to bellow to gain their attention. Antony then commences a skilfully rhetoric argument against the conspirators. The repetition of the word ‘ambitious’ by Antony in act 3, scene 2 subtly ridicules and discredits Brutus and wins over the crowd. By using this rhetoric dialogue in Antony’s speech, Shakespeare communicates Antony’s perspective and personality. The clash of the two personalities and perspectives of Brutus and Antony in this scene extends the drama and emphasizes the contrast of characters included in ‘Julius Caesar’.…

    • 858 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Analysis
    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Tragic Hero Analysis

    Within The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, it is argumentative that Julius Caesar appears to fit the definition of a tragic hero, however it is also believed by a large sum of individuals that Marcus Brutus is found to be a more fitting character to the definition of a tragic hero. Written by William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is based upon a plot which revolves around the common theme of a tragedy, which can be perceived as a dramatic composition that often involves verses as well as a death of a high class individual, during the Elizabethan era.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar: A Tragic Hero
    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar: A Tragic Hero

    The story of Julius Caesar is a time period where Caesar was the noblest men of all of Rome. It's a famous time were there was a lot of tragic events. For example in act 3 scene 1 Cesar is stabbed and killed by the conspirators at the senate. The fall of their King was a tragic event. Also Brutus committing suicide who was also one of the noblest man of Rome. A tragedy is a powerful impact in a story. Which in ties in with a tragic hero who is the main protagonist {character} in the story but they will most likely will not achieve their ends they will most likely die in trying. Brutus in my opinion is a tragic hero in the story of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a character that we learn about who he really is. We learn what his motives is in the…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Brutus Speech Analysis
    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Julius Caesar Brutus Speech Analysis

    Before his speech begins, the whole crowd is going wild with overwhelming support for Brutus. Knowing this, Antony is quickly able to capture the attention of the people by saying, “For Brutus’ sake, I am beholding to you” (64). By starting off with saying that Brutus endorses whatever Antony is able to say, they are suddenly more curious to hear what he say and what exactly their beloved Brutus approves of. By saying this, Antony is able to borrow Brutus’ honest reputation and use it as his own. Towards the end of his speech, Antony borrows Caesar’s renewed ethos, once again merging voices and giving Antony even more credibility. He asks the audience, “Wherein hath Caesar thus deserved your love?” (234). Antony successfully borrows Caesar’s great reputation and increases his credibility for the people to trust him.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Credibility Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar
    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Credibility Of Brutus In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    Building upon Brutus’s opening statement, Marc Antony begins his speech with “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears;” By putting “Friends” first, Antony appeals to the people on a more personal level than Brutus, and sets a more informal tone for the rest of his speech, making himself part of the crowd instead of someone above it. Throughout his speech, he also predominantly uses “you” and “your”, only using personal programs when relating anecdotes about Caesar. This draws attention to the people…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Irony In Antony's Eulogy For Caeser
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    Irony In Antony's Eulogy For Caeser

    Antony proves strong in all of the ways that Brutus proves weak. His impulsive, improvisatory nature serves him perfectly, first to persuade the conspirators that he is on their side, thus gaining their leniency, and then to persuade the plebeians of the conspirators' injustice, thus gaining the masses' political support. Not too scrupulous to stoop to deceit and duplicity, as Brutus claims to be, Antony proves himself a consummate politician, using gestures and skilled rhetoric to his advantage. He responds to subtle cues among both his nemeses and his allies to know exactly how he must conduct himself at each particular moment in order to gain the most advantage. In Both his eulogy for Caeser and the play as a whole, Antony is adept at tailoring…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Brutus: The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar
    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus: The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

    Brutus only has two choices in act II of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, to kill caesar or to let the roman republic fall under caesar. Brutus decides to kill Caesar under the manipulation of Cassius. But to be able to make that decision he had to be under a certain mindset which involved many different things. In the beginning of act II Brutus decides that he must kill Julius Caesar but, with that he must have been under a certain mindset which was contributed to by many things.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony: Loyal Friend or Cunning Politician?
    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mark Antony: Loyal Friend or Cunning Politician?

    Antony was a devoted follower of Julius Caesar. Because he was a good friend, he was willing to be second hand to Caesar, the new king. Whilst Caesar would become the king, the most valuable but least powerful piece in chess, he would become the rook, a semi-valuable, very important piece. He wanted the crown to be given to Caesar so that the political vacuum would be filled and no conflicts would occur. Antony was unsettled by Caesar's death but mainly sought to use this to his advantage and gain power. He showed how clever and cunning he could be when he convinced the crowd at Caesar's funeral ceremony to side with him and not with the murderers. The people became excited and rowdy when he teased them about the will, waving it in the air and pretending as if he was not going to read it. Antony took advantage of the public idiocy when he first pretended to respect the conspirators calling them honorable men, and then slowly proving that they were not. He spoke out against them because he wanted power for himself, and unlike Brutus, he was politically ambitious and so believed that if he could take control while the state was in turmoil, he will remain in power. He was alone in making this oration, showing he had the confidence and courage needed to take charge.…

    • 584 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    comparison between brutus and antony speech
    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    comparison between brutus and antony speech

    On the other hand, Antony’s speech was more personal and sarcastic. First of all, Antony enters dramatically to the pulpit with Caesar's body to win the sympathy of the mob. In contrary to Brutus he opens his speech with “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears”. This sets up his later statements of being Caesar’s friend and also a patriarchic. It also conveys him as a friend to listeners unlike Brutus who gave speech as a ruler to Romans.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marc Antony Speech
    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marc Antony Speech

    One of the many ways that Mark Antony is an excellent speaker is how he uses the rhetorical device ethos. He persuades the crowd by giving them compliments such as, “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears.” This shows that Mark Antony is getting into the crowd’s heart with his status as a trustworthy man. Furthermore, Antony is familiar with the crowd, and he knows how to get into their heads. He also persuades them using an ethical argument by saying, “Come I to speak in Caesar’s funeral. He was my friend, faithful and just to me.” Mark Antony is telling the plebeians that he was close to Caesar and that he knew him very well - that they should believe his word. Mark Antony’s speech was success at persuading the crowd because he used his own characteristics to his advantage (III, ii, 73-86).…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics