The Three Main Arguments Of Divorce

The author of this passage argues that divorce in some circumstances is acceptable, despite being Catholic. A part of the Catholic belief is that marriage is worth saving, one should only be married once in a lifetime. The author believes that divorce is not always bad. The main argument of divorce being acceptable in some situations is backed up by three arguments. The reasoning behind each individual argument are: abuse, differences that can’t be reconciled, and elements relating to kids. The sub argument about kids also branches out into other reasonings.
Sentence (1) is where the author introduces their religious background, which does not play a major role in the argument. The main argument is revealed in sentence (3) “divorce is not always bad.” The premise added with some personal experience is found in sentence (2) where the author states that they are pragmatic, and has had some friends go through divorces, where the stipulation was acceptable. Sentence (3),
“Here, divorce isn’t such a bad thing.” (7) The author even goes into mentioning that divorces can save lives for those in toxic relationships. A combination of thoughts 7 and 8 make the complete thought that is the argument. “Here, divorce isn’t such a bad thing (7). It might even save one’s life,” (8). Sentence (6) in conjunction with sentence (10), combine two complete thoughts/reasonings that makeup claims that support sentence (18), which is the main supporter of the main argument of sentence (3), which is “divorce is not always bad.” Divorce isn’t a bad thing when abuse or insolvable differences are brought into the picture. The diagram below shows about half of the microstructure that is the argument that divorce is not always