Preview

The Supremacy Clause Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
126 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Supremacy Clause Analysis
Most commonly refereed to as the Supremacy clause, Article VI Section II of the constitution established that three specific areas of legislation will take president over any other. The Constitution, Federal Statues, and Treaties are all specifically defined as the “Supreme Law of the Land.” This can be interpreted in a way such that the supremacy clause grants the laws made by the federal government priority over any state acts in the face of a conflict with the national law. In this respect, the Supremacy Clause follows the lead of Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation, which provided that “[e]very state shall abide by the determinations of the united states in congress assembled, on all questions which by this confederation are submitted

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    1. The Supreme Court had to decide if the state had power over the federal government in regulating commerce based on Article I Section 8.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exactly shall be the supreme law of land? “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land.”…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The constitutional established supremacy as the fed. Gov. (preemption- when fed. Law or regulation precludes enforcement of state/loc. Law or regulations.)…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Court through Chief Justice Marshall has shown that the constitution is more superior than the federal law. No place in the constitution affirms the words Justice Marshall proclaimed. In making his judgment, Marshall stated that “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” There is no mention of such words in the Constitution, but it has come to the attention of the courts that whenever there is a conflict of law, the constitution is always supreme (Murphy,…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Drawing from the premise of the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause and the Supreme Court’s interpretation, federal law can preempt state law in two ways. First, federal law can preempt state law when federal law…

    • 2566 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article VI – The supremacy Act Clearly states that the federal gov is supreme over state.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles I, II, and III of the Constitution clearly delineate the division of power between the three branches of government in an attempt to keep any one branch from becoming more powerful than its counter parts. Article I clearly defines powers of Congress ‘to regulate commerce among the states and with foreign nations,” among others. I like the way Article II allows each state to take part in the selection of the President and Vice President yet clearly states Congress alone cannot elect them. Article III establishes the federal court system that oversees the court systems of the states. The Judicial branch, specifically the Supreme Court is the final arbiter and interpreter of Constitutional law. Article IV clearly establishes a set of checks and balances which apply to all states in the Union clearly outlining acceptable behaviors for all states. While the 10th Amendment states and I am paraphrasing, any power not specifically delegated in the Constitution is decided by the states.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The heart of the constitution is the National Supremacy Clause, which states that the constitution and federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land," meaning it is superior to the law of the states. I personally do not think that the federal laws should always supersede state laws, but there can be times in which the federal government wants the entire country on the same page and they can use their power to do so. The federal government should create laws that effects, and sometimes benefits the country as a whole. The states, on the other hand, should create laws that are unique to the people living in them that do not interfere with the laws set by the federal government.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stated in Article III section 2 of the constitution are the powers of the Supreme Court, “The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made,…” (U.S Const. article III. sec 2). One of the most important cases that dealt with what the powers of the Supreme Court was Marbury v Madison. Marbury v Madison was a landmark Supreme Court case because the out come helped form the country we have today.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury v. Madison

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The case "Marbury v. Madison began on March, 1801, when a Proponent, William Marbury, was assigned as a magistrate in the District of Columbia. William Marbury and various others were constituted to government posts made by United States Congress in the last days of President John Adams's administration; merely these eleventh hour appointments were never completely nailed down. The dissatisfied appointees raised an act of US Congress and litigated for their jobs in the Supreme…

    • 1386 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court was presented with the case of Fischer vs. The University of Texas where Abigail Fisher was suing the University for discrimination in their affirmative action based admissions process. The Supreme Court voted 7-1 and ruled to send the case back to the lower courts for further review and put off making any final decisions to change the U.S. policy on affirmative action, a “longstanding but fragile societal compromise, one that forbids quotas but allows using race as one factor among many in the admissions process” (Laptik). Both articles discussed in length the constitutionality of the race-based admissions process as well as explaining the Supreme Court’s position on the matter. The justices made statements that explained that the admissions programs must be subject to strict scrutiny where the it can be determined that classification based on gender, race and ethnicity occurs for the sole purpose of creating a diverse student population. The programs that use affirmative action in public universities are being scrutinized to ensure that their methods are a means to an end and serve to create diversity only. This issue will come before the Supreme Court again in the future and there will most likely be a more permanent ruling on the matter.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the political process has the final decision in how the power is divided between the national and state governments, the Supreme Court is often the final say in the debate about which level of government should do what, for whom, and to whom. This role was claimed for the Courts because of the outcome of McCulloch v. Maryland case, in which the state of Maryland levied a tax against the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States and was then challenged in court by James McCulloch. McCulloch was a cashier of the bank who refused to pay the tax levied against the bank on the grounds that a state could not tax an instrument of the national government. In this case, it was decided by Chief Justice John Marshall to set forth the doctrine of National Supremacy, which states that in cases of conflict between the constitutionally authorized actions of the national government and those of the state or local governments, the actions of the federal government is supreme. In this decision, the Supreme Court dealt a great blow to a claim of states rights by rejecting a states attempt to interfere with a legitimate federal activity. As a result, this decision transferred power away from the states toward the national government.…

    • 870 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution is the highest law in the United States. All other laws come from the Constitution and Amendments. It rules how the government should work. It creates the Presidency, Congress, and the Supreme Court. Each state also has a constitution. The constitutions of the states are their highest law for that state — but the United States Constitution is higher.…

    • 581 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. A law in violation of the Constitution, no matter what its source, will be de¬clared unconstitutional and will not be enforced. Thus, the federal stat¬ute does not have priority over the Constitution. The federal statute would have priority over the state constitution, however, because under the U.S. Constitution, when there is a conflict between a federal law and a state law, the state law is rendered invalid.…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus Notes

    • 922 Words
    • 7 Pages

    supremacy clause of Article VI: federal laws and treaties are supreme notwithstanding state constitutions and laws…

    • 922 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays