The Super Project

Good Essays
The Super Project
Flows:
1) Test Market Expenses: Do not Include it is a sunk cost and cannot be recovered if the project were not to become operational. 2) Overhead cost: The Super project will initially not require incremental overhead costs. However, if and when the project grows, incremental overhead expenses will be incurred specific to the project. This has to be captured in capital budgeting to accurately assess the project. Here we assume that the project will not require considerable incremental overhead expenses till year 4 (3 year growth and market establishment). 10 Year avg. Overhead cost = 10 year avg. EBIT Facility used basis – 10 year avg. EBIT Full allocated basis = $54,000. 3) Excess Capacity: The Super project is based on the use of excess 1/3rd machine and 2/3rd building capacity of the Jell-O product. This cost has been allocated to Jell-O and thus not a const consideration for capital budgeting purposes. Also, the excess capacity and current growth rate of Jell-O does not justify the opportunity cost of excess capacity. Thus, the excess capacity should not be considered as capital investment into the Super project. 4) Erosion of Jell-O market: The Super product seems to be a ‘commodity’ product in that any Jell-O manufacturing company could potentially make this product as the machinery is the same. The low entry barrier to powder the market coupled with the growth increases the probability of a competitor to launch similar product and cause erosion of the Jell-O market. Since this market scenario seems inevitable in the near future, the addition of erosion adjustment to the Super project is not justified. 5) Depreciation add back for cash flows: The incremental analysis does not add back depreciation to cancel the effect of this non-cash transaction. We have used the depreciation method used in the case for simplicity however, realizing that a different depreciation method would create a better cash flow. 6)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Super Project

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Keisha M. Smith Bus 436 Due Date: 04/30/15 Super Project Analysis After carefully reviewing Super Project’s data, I’ve come to the conclusion that test market expenses and the allocation of charges for the use of the excess agglomerator capacity are not incremental because they are sunken costs that have already been accounted for. Whether Super is accepted or rejected, they will not affect the cash flows beyond current calculations. Overhead expenses is incremental because the expansion needed…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Super Project

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Super Project The Super Project case mainly deals with the efficiency of project tool analysis in capital budgeting process. The three techniques that General Foods management used to determine whether Super Project was a worthwhile project were: • Incremental basis • Facilities-used basis • Fully allocated facilities and costs basis The three techniques mentioned above will be discussed in more details in question 4 below. Questions: 1. What are the relevant cash flows for General Foods…

    • 1486 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super Project

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Super Project Case What are the relevant cash flows that General Foods should use in evaluating the Super Project? In particular, how should management deal with such issues as Test-market expenses? Overhead Expenses? Erosion of Jell-O contribution margin? Allocation of charges for the use of the excess agglomerator? The relevant cash flows that General Foods should use in evaluating the Super Project are considered Incremental cash flows and are “the changes in the firm’s cash flows…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Super Project

    • 1293 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Super Project Introduction General Foods (GF) expects Super, a new powdered dessert, to capture 10% share of the total dessert market (2% coming from the erosion of Jell-O sales). The company’s Financial Analyst has issued a memo comparing three alternative techniques for project evaluations, illustrating the problems and limitations inherent in using ROFE (return on funds employed) and payback as evaluation methods. The disparate ROFE results obtained with these methods are due to differences…

    • 1293 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Super Project

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Super Project – Summary Introduction In 1967, General Foods was considering to expand their portfolio with a new product called Super. Super was a dessert supposed to penetrate a dessert market in growth. The investment required $200K, $80K for building modifications and $120K for machinery and equipment. General Foods already had an agglomerator that could be used to manufacture Super. The $120K was meant to pay for packaging machinery. In order to decide whether to accept or decline this…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Super Project

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Super Project Case Study FIN 3717 Braden Eddy, Lauren Gear and Dakota Conravey The Super Project Case Study FIN 3717 Braden Eddy, Lauren Gear and Dakota Conravey Statement of Facts General Foods is a large corporation organized by product lines. They are evaluating Super Project, the manufacture of a new powdered dessert. Crosby Sanberg, a financial analysis manager, must determine the value in accepting the proposal, along with J.C. Kresslin, the Corporate Controller. The Super…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super Project HBS

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    determine whether the Super project was feasible, and would exist even if the project were deemed unfeasible. 1.ii. Overhead Expenses: Mr. Sanberg proposed to include these in the fully allocated method used in Alternative III. However, we believe that these expenses have already been attributed to the Jell-O line of products, and the data does not explicitly provide the overheads attributed to the Super project. Hence, these should not be considered while evaluating the project. 1.iii. Erosion of…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Super Project Case

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Executive Summary In the Super Project case, Crosby set out to argue that the current methodologies being utilized by General Foods Corporation to determine which capital investments to pursue did not always fit the bill. Crosby advocated using alternative methods for evaluation of Super including: 1) Incremental Basis, 2) Facilities Used Basis, and 3) Fully Allocated Basis. He provided the Corporate Budgets and Analysis management team with documentation that articulated each of the methods he…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super Project Summary

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages

    General Foods “Super” was a new instant desert being targeted for introduction in the late 1960’s. The chocolate flavor was estimated to account for 80% of total sales of the new product. Presumably, this means “Super” would have been “Jello Pudding” in reality. The project request consisted included a $200,000 request, consisting of $80,000 for building modifications and $120,000 for machinery and equipment; presumed to be entirely additional packaging machinery as available agglomerator…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Birds Eye. Their customers are retail consumers. The Super Project presented General Foods management with the possibility to introduce a new dessert product, named Super, into the market. The dilemma management faced was how to appropriately measure and allocate costs associated with the project, as well as, whether to accept or reject the project based on costs and future cash flows generated by Super. With regard to The Super Project or any capital budgeting decision, time value of money concepts…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays