Preview

The Suffragettes

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Suffragettes
During the nineteenth century, some women had started to demand the right to vote in elections, and in 1918 the government finally gave in and let them have the rights. Now some people may argue that it was the rioting and campaigning of the Suffragettes that made the government give women the rights to vote, however the real reason was the hard work women had shown they were capable of during World War One.
In 1906, the Daily Mail named the women who fought to try and get the vote for women, ‘The Suffragettes’ and they stuck with it. The main thing the Suffragettes did to make the government give in was violence. They started off by having marches through London which fascinated the public. But the following year, they started throwing stones,
…show more content…
When women were arrested and put in prison, they decided to starve themselves unless the government treated them as political prisoners. This new tactic started off with a lady called Marion Wallace Dunlop but was then something every single women did when she was put in prison. This tactic was a success for women because after being in prison for about three days, she would be released. During the summer, over thirty women were released. This meant that the Suffragettes could carry rioting and campaigning once they were released. One of the reasons why the government allowed women to be released was because they didn’t want women to die; they knew that as soon as women were out of prison, she would eat as much as she could to start rioting again. Some people may say that this is why women got the right to vote. If the government didn’t release women after a few days they would die. A women’s job was to stay at home, cook and look after the children. If a woman died, there wouldn’t be anyone to do this for the family. The home Secretary introduced force feeding because he thought “to let a women starve would not only be inhuman but, in the event of death would lead to a charge of manslaughter”. However, force feeding did not last long because the way it was done could lead to the women having food in her lungs which would lead to death. This could also be argued that this is why the …show more content…
Women had many jobs to do such as nursing, working in factories, sewing bandages, sending war bonds, spying and making weapons. All these jobs were seen to be jobs that only men could do because women were only meant to work at home. This also made the government see that women were able to things that only men were meant to be able to do. In 1916 Mr Asquith, the Prime Minister, said “It is true that women cannot fight in the sense of going out with a rifle and so forth, but they have aided in the most effective way the war. Have not women a special claim to be heard on the many questions which will arise affecting their interests? I cannot deny them that claim”. This is how the women got the rights to vote. They showed that they can do what men can do their and abilities. The government was able to see for the first time that women are highly skilled and can do what men can

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    During the 1900s, many women were beginning to stand up for themselves and no longer wanted to be inferior to men. Prior to 1918, women were disrespected and under - valued in society. There was a change in attitudes towards women as the image of the "New Women" began to arise. They were becoming involved in various different jobs, having the ability to be better educated and get involved in politics. However, this view that the "New Women" was the only factor that contributed to women getting the vote is untrue. Women began their own campaigns in order to get the vote. This included the Suffragists and the Suffragettes as both organisations were tired of being ignored and seen as "undeserving"of the vote. Furthermore, another addition to the factors is the "Reward Theory". Women during World War 1 became greatly involved in helping Britain in the war (e.g taking up jobs which were dangerous and only men would have normally done them). Therefore, the views upon women had changed and had a great impact on the reason women got the vote, but this is not the only factor that aided their achievement.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Women were not treated as equals with men before the second half of the eighteenth century. They had to marry, obey their husbands and have children, only receiving little education. In the eyes of the law they had little power and men were their superiors. For example, once they were married, everything they owned belonged to their husband, this meant that if they separated the women would be left with nothing, not even her children, as they too, belonged solely to the husband.
Around 1850, the rights of women started to change, as laws were made to improve women's education and rights in marriage. However women were still not allowed to vote in the general elections. Many women considered this as a huge prejudice, and that they would have to carry on being second-class citizens until they received the right to vote because a lot of women thought that having a say in general elections would give them more opportunities and rights.
Before 1918, only men had the vote, even though they had to qualify by meeting the property qualification (which was someone who earned 40 shillings a year and was a freeholder). Therefore, not all men did qualify, but many women did qualify, and as a result could vote in local elections.
As I mentioned above, people had to meet the property qualification in order to vote. Many women did own property of the right value, and so were entitled to the vote. The Married Women's Property Act made even more women qualify, as they could keep their earnings.
Women had to endure the same laws as men and also had to pay taxes, like men. So, the women only saw it fair to be able to vote, which gave women a say in what the laws and taxes were.
One of the arguments used against women's suffrage was that they were considered physically and mentally too weak. Women's argument towards that was that women had become successful monarchs of this country, for example, Queen Elizabeth I and the present Queen of the time, Queen Victoria. If women were suitable…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bussiness Not Pleasure

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “No one will ever know if the suffragettes or suffragists had the better tactics for winning the vote. For by August 1914 Britain was at war . . . . Millions women became a key part of the war effort making shells, bombs, guns and uniforms. In January 1918, women were rewarded when the wartime government passed the Representation of the people Act giving a vote to all women over 30 years of age.”…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Suffragettes” was a term used around the world to describe all women who campaigned for the right to vote in elections (Big Black Dog Communications Pty Ltd australia.gov.au/about-australia/australian-story/austn-suffragettes, 5th March 2010). Each Australian state had at least one suffrage society during the 1880s and 1890s that published leaflets; organised debates, public meetings and letter-writing campaigns and arranging deputations to members of their colonial parliaments. In 1891, suffragettes gathered 30, 000 women’s signatures and presented them as a petition to the Victorian Parliament. Another petition was presented to the South Australian and Northern Territory government in 1894.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To understand the reasons behind some women getting the vote in 1918, one must look back at the history of the women’s movement to fully understand the reason female suffrage was sought and gained. In Victorian Britain there was a longstanding and persistent belief that men and women occupied separate spheres. The separate spheres ideology promoted the belief that due to women’s roles in reproduction, they were best suited to occupy the private sphere of home and family. Alternatively, men were designed to occupy the public sphere work and politics . However, this ideology was a direct contradiction to the reality of Victorian women who, in 1871, constituted nearly 32 per cent of the total British labour force.…

    • 2235 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suffragists Dbq

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In order to obtain equality with men, women had to use a lot of strategies, which led them to many challenges. Some of the strategies the suffragists used were parading, hunger strike, picketing and organizing political parties. Getting sent to prison was one of the many challenges others included force-feeding and anti-suffragists.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Women’s suffrage has always been a major conflict in the United States, but also all over the world. Generations of women have taken action to protest, fighting for what they believed in; feminists. The struggle of not superiority but equality and respect as any other male was the message activists of the women's rights movement was trying to convey. Although many of the women were well educated, they were still were still denied the right to vote. The Women’s suffrage Movement took several years to make its way through and successfully in 1920 women won voting rights.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ww1 Unit 1 Research Paper

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Source 6, an essay by B. Harrison written in 1993, illustrates the idea of many people that it helped to back up the Anti’s physical strength idea; “the idea that men and women had separate roles because women are, on average, physically weaker than men”. To me this is irrelevant; this idea had been popular in previous years when opponents of suffrage had claimed that women were not worthy of the vote as they could not fight for their country. Yet how on earth can this be argued when the women did so much to ensure the victory of the war? It is evident that even though women were not on the frontlines, without their efforts from home the war could simply have not been won! In this sense they did fight for their country as they put themselves out further than they usually would have to, to protect King and country and to defend what they fought was right. Source 6 conflicts this by arguing that women did not go through “the horrors of the frontline” and that most women stayed at home whilst the men went to war. Whilst this is true, I still do not think that it omits their substantial efforts at home, and this is backed up by my previous point that physical strength was no longer enough to keep the women from having the vote. Somebody had to stay at home and run the country- old politicians were not blamed for staying at home and working in an administration role because they could not fight so why should women be? The final point of Source 6 is that the First World War “pushed all peace time agenda down the line”. Whilst this is arguably valid, once the war was won these issues would inevitably arise once again, and in my opinion it helped to bring them even closer to the forefront, as it allowed women to be seen in a different light, and also helped the suffragettes get out of what was turning into somewhat of a reoccurring rut. I think that the…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1867 most of the male population in Britain received the vote most historians agree that the beginning of the suffrage campaign was in 1832 when a woman asked a campaigner, while campaigning for the wider male, vote to include women. It was not until 1903 when Mrs Emmeline Pankhurst founded the Woman's Social and Political Union (WSPU). She founded this group having been a member of the Suffragists. She became frustrated with the Suffragists' tactics, especially their middle class and gradualist ideas. The motto of the Suffragettes was "Deeds, not Words" and this was reflected in everything they did. In this essay I will loom at weather the WSPU helped or hinders women’s quest to gain the vote in Britain.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On The 19th Amendment

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Can you believe at one time women were not allowed to vote? It wasn't until the Nineteenth Amendment was passed in 1920 that women obtained this right. Throughout the history of America's government, the legislature has passed many different Amendments. One important amendment to women was the nineteenth. This Amendment deals with the issues of Women's suffrage. There was much controversy of whether or not woman should have the right to vote. Many different key women such as Elizabeth Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and Susan B. Anthony devoted most of their lives to help obtain the passage of women's suffrage in America.…

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The campaign for the female franchise had been slow in progress since the 1860s. However in 1903, when Emmeline Pankhurst set up the WSPU (Women’s Social and Political Union), campaigners of women’s suffrage were offered an alternative method of protest- ‘Deeds not words’. The Suffragettes’ destructive behaviour was effective in achieving media attention and aroused discussion about gender inequality within society, ‘they kept the suffrage…

    • 2685 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suffragettes Dbq

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The suffragettes went with the motto “Deeds not words”. The suffragettes where seen by some to be the most important factor as they brought the issue to a national audience through the media. The suffragettes participated in many events in which to gain publicity. One example was the suffragettes chained themselves to fences outside parliament, this showed people that the suffragettes where not backing down on their cause and also changed the views of men showing that they were mentally, physicsally and emotionally capable, in a sense it gave the cause a positive view as it did keep the issue in the papers and forcing action to happen. Owever, it was in reality harmful to helping women achieve the vote in 1918 as the militancy caused major issues for the Liberal Government of 1906 – 1914. This is significant as the militancy caused the government to not grant he vote to women as…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So to begin, the Suffragists were an extremely large group of women and some men who believed that the women of the British Empire should have the right to vote for who ran the country that they lived in. The suffragist movement (the NUWSS (National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies)) was founded in 1897 by Millicent Fawcett who was born in Suffolk in 1847. Apparently she was hit by inspiration at one of the MPs John Stuart Mill's (representative of women's suffrage in the houses of parliament) speeches in 1865 as he explained to the public about women's rights and why women should be allowed to vote thus leading her to the creation of the NUWSS. Millicent did not believe that violence gave results, so the NUWSS attempted many peaceful methods of communicating with the men of the government to get there rights law past, for example they wrote letters to members of parliament, they visited member's houses and they signed many, many, many petitions. However, there rather feeble attempts were unsuccessful and no news came to them of the law being past.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I will explain how women won the right to vote in 1919. Women’s suffrage groups (groups who fought for the right to vote for women) had existed since the 1870s. There were women like Emily Stowe, Adelaide Hoodless, Marie-Lacoste Gerin Lajoie, and…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suffragists Vs Suffragettes

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Suffragettes in the other hand weren’t very peaceful women, they were very aggressive, and they even used violence, so they could change people’s points of views. In 1867, Britain’s National Society for Women’s Suffrage was formed and was very alike to the Society of women’s Rights. In the year of 1878 when the first worldwide assembly for women’s rights in Paris, in which they arranged their cause of being there. Their cast caught the attention of the males press personnel. But these women rights were denied at the congress. So this action led up to a new type of group called the suffragettes, which was created by a mother of three girls. The mother’s name was Emmeline Pankhurst, and the other three girl’s names were Christabel, Sylvia, and Adela. These four members left the suffragists association in 1903 and made their own association named the Women’s Social and Political Union. This association solved things more by actions than by words. The Suffragettes just made others angry and they also damaged all over the place where they were present. They would also go on assemblages protesting, and damaging businesses. Emmeline Pankhurst seems like she was trying to cause just violence instead of actually trying to get into the assembly. Emmeline Pankhurst not only went to jail for six weeks because she was causing…

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays