Preview

The Successes and Failures of the League of Nations

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Successes and Failures of the League of Nations
During the 1920’s the League of Nations primary desire was to end war across all fronts and to promote international co-operation. Therefore the best criteria that can be used to classify a success, was whether war was avoided and a peaceful settlement formulated after a crisis between two or more nations.

Although this aim was the most important the league also tried to help economic problems in other countries. This applied to the economic collapse of Austria and Hungary between 1922-3. When Austria-Hungary faced bankruptcy the league organised loans for them and slowly they were able to begin economic recovery due to the League’s aid.

As stopping conflict was a priority for the league their first success was sorting out The Aaland Islands. These islands are near enough equal distant between Finland and Sweden. They had traditionally belonged to Finland but most of the islanders wanted to be governed by Sweden. Neither Sweden nor Finland could come to a decision as to who owned the islands and in 1921 they asked the League to adjudicate. The League’s decision was that they should remain with Finland but that no weapons should ever be kept there. Both countries accepted the decision and it remains in force to this day.

Their Second judgement fell when Upper Silesia was wanted by both Poland and Germany during 1921. The Treaty of Versailles had given the people of Upper Silesia the right to have a referendum on whether they wanted to be part of Germany or part of Poland. In this referendum, 700,000 voted for Germany and 500,000 for Poland. This close result resulted in rioting between those who expected Silesia to be made part of Germany and those who wanted to be part of Poland. The League was asked to settle this dispute. After a six-week inquiry, the League decided to split Upper Silesia between Germany and Poland. The League’s decision was accepted y both countries and by the people in Upper Silesia.

The League of Nations final settlement involved the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After the war ended, Allied leaders and President Wilson were faced with putting Europe back together the way it was before the war. Certain events led to the Senate’s defeat of the treaty. Wilson was an optimistic progressive, with striking policies for the outlook of Europe. Many of these plans were shut down by other leaders; Wilson still approved the conditions of the Treaty of Versailles because his prime issue, the League of Nations, was still included. Many people of the world did not see the League as a good idea. They wanted and were promised the war to end in a peace and “moralize nationalism”, but the treaty did not reach their expectations (Document B). It planned to prevent effects that were conflicting by using the same things for opposition. It wanted to use force to destroy force, militarism to prevent militarism, et cetera (Document A). Americans recognized that the resolutions projected and allowed by Wilson were condemned to fail.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Clare, John D " Why the League Failed" Greenfield History Site. 2002 Online. Available: http://www.johndclare.net/league_of_nations8.htm Dec. 24 2005…

    • 1697 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A2 History Coursework

    • 1584 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to most of the interpretations, international diplomacy wasn’t the reason to why there was stability in Europe between 1919 to 1930. After the First World War many countries were unstable and economically drained. However the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles were put in place to make sure that another war would not occur again and that Germany pays for the First World War.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is where the Treaty of Versailles was drafted and signed by multiple countries, except the United States. As stated in Document A, “The first proposition...with the proposed League of Nations in that of a tribunal to settle the matters of controversy which may arise between different nations.” The League of Nations was an organization created during the conference to join the allied powers that would collectivise decisions in world affairs. Although Woodrow Wilson thought highly of this idea many conservatives and liberals saw this as a way to strip Americans ability to make decisions on its own. They feared that the nation would revert back to being controlled as England once had colonial rule over it. Another issue was that the League of Nations and the Treaty of Versailles had no way of enforcing peace without disrupting it. As also demonstrated in Document A, the Treaty tried keep peace but couldn’t because it would use violence to stop violence. In other words it would use larger unified forces to stop smaller disputes that threatened world peace.To further support conservative views, the popular vote would decide whether or not the nations in the League would involve themselves in world disputes. With this system, it was impossible to have a decision fair to all nations because if it wasn’t unanimous, at least one nation would go unrepresented and be involved or uninvolved in something they disagreed…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Understand The Future

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    points to preserve peace. More than 40 nations joined the League of Nations and they agreed to talk…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The League of Nations failed on many accounts to maintain peace in Europe, the League seemed only to back up countries within the League and would not intervene in conflicts its members were not apart of, as seen in the war between Russia and Poland from 1920 to 1921. In 1920, Poland invaded Russian land. The Polish army quickly overwhelmed the Russian army and made a swift advanced into Russia. The Russians had to sign the Treaty of Riga, which handed over nearly 80,000 square kilometers of Russian land over to Poland. The League did nothing, as Russia was seen as a ‘plague from the East’ and was feared by the Western powers such as Britain and France, some of the Leagues senior members. The war between Russia and Poland showed that the League was looking out for its own member’s interest not the good of all nations and was one of its first failures.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Historical Problems

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Leuchgenburg, William E. The Perils of Prosperity 1914-1932. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 1993: 349…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In terms of the League’s desire to end war, the only criteria that can be used to classify a success, was whether war was avoided and a peaceful settlement was reached after a crisis between two nations. One of these disputes was made by Sweden and Finland regarding the Aarland islands. These islands are near enough equal distant between Finland and Sweden. They had traditionally belonged to Finland but most of the islanders wanted to be Swedish. Neither Sweden nor Finland could come to a decision as to who owned the islands and in 1921 they asked the League to make a judgement. The League’s decision was that they should remain with Finland but that no weapons should ever be kept there. Both countries accepted the decision and it remains in force to…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    aims was to prevent to outbreak of wars, improve people's lives and jobs, agree to disarmament, and enforce the Treaty of Versailles. The League hoped it could influence countries to ensure peace by international diplomacy and mediation, economic sanction, force, and moral condemnation. This seemed to work well at first; however, later, there proved to be many weaknesses contained in the Treaty. For example, the League did not have an army of its own, which means that if any of the countries ignored the Leagues decision, then the League would have no power to do anything. The main strength of the League was that it was set up by the Treaty of Versailles. Later, people started to attack the treaty; this was also a major weakness of the League. In fact, one of the most serious weaknesses was that the League had limited membership. Most of the powerful countries were not members. For instance, the US refused to join although Woodrow Wilson was the one who proposed the idea of a League. Germany was not allowed to be a member, and communist Russia resented Britain and France's membership. Another critical weakness was the decision-making process established by the League. This process involves all the members acting together in order for the League to take action. Therefore, if one member disagrees or does…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hitler wanted to expand his army throughout Europe and eventually become supreme ruler of the world. Fortunately they defeated hitler. Other Political leaders like Benito Mussolini and Hideki Tojo fought with Hitler. The League of Nations was another political contribution to World War 2. In theory the League of Nations was a good idea and did have some early successes, but it was a failure. During the 1920’s the world was in a deep depression which lead to economy falls, reduce trading, and rise of unemployment rate. The reasons why the League of Nations was a failure during World War II is because not all countries joined, it had no power, had no army, and unable to act…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The League of Nations was an international organisation set up in 1919 to help keep world peace. It was intended that all countries would be members of the League and that if there were disputes between countries they could be settled by negotiation rather than by force. If this failed then countries would stop trading with the aggressive country and if that failed then countries would use their armies to…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why did disarmament fail?

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The next big failure of the League of Nations was over disarmament. The League had not had any success in this area in the 1920s either, but at that stage, when the international climate was better, it had not seemed to matter as much.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Castle Project

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Hopefully now, you will have completed the work about the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930s. This is the end of this particular module, so the first thing I would like you to do is to do a practice exam question.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Though this can be seen as a League success – as the issue was settled – a counter argument is that what happened was the result of the use of force and that the League responded in a positive manner to those (the Lithuanians) who had used force.  Austria and Hungary were on the brink of bankruptcy due to reparations and weak economies after the war  The league arranged international loans and helped them manage their finances Economic Collapse, Austria & Hungary, 1922The Greek-Bulgarian 3 Dispute 1925  They were able to begin economic recovery Greek-Bulgarian border the source of dispute After some violent incidents, Greece invaded Bulgaria League condemned Greece’s actions and pressurised them to withdraw They did so to avoid war…

    • 625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Coursework

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Initially, interpretation A presents the view that mutual pacts between Germany, Belgium and France helped peace in the region. These agreements would have allowed the possibility of future dealings as well as reducing post-war tensions; however, as interpretation D agrees, I believe this détente was an “illusion”. I believe the idea the agreements helped achieve stability to be unjustified, as the 1920’s show, arbitration through international organisations failed to work – especially where Eastern Europe was concerned. In 1920 Poland launched two aggressive wars against Lithuania and Russia, the 1920 Polish-Soviet war and the 1919 Polish-Lithuanian war respectively, and despite Lithuania’s appeals towards the League of Nations, no action was taken against Poland. Russia’s situation also highlights a problem with countries that were not invited to join the League, namely Russia and Germany, as they could not appeal to the League - this is supported by France’s military invasion of the Ruhr in 1923. This supports the idea that arbitration did not achieve stability in 1920; countries could make agreements without fear of retribution from the League if they broke them, and this would have furthered paranoia amongst newer and smaller states in Eastern Europe who were unable to properly defend themselves. Fear from attacks would have led to a build up in arms, armaments, and alliances as is shown with the formation of the ‘Little Entente’ between Czechoslovakia, Romania and Yugoslavia in 1919 and 1920. While one could argue this would have led to stability through stability, the Genoa Conference of 1922 highlighted tensions between the countries, especially where the Soviet Union was concerned – because of its failures, I believe it served only to increase tensions in the East with the Soviet Union and Germany. This…

    • 1369 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays