Preview

The Struggle Of The Persian Army Case Study

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2225 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Struggle Of The Persian Army Case Study
THE STRUGGLE OF THE CYPRIOTS AGAINST PERSIAN RULE
IN ANTIQUITY

INTRODUCTION:
In 650 B.C Cyprus was left free from the Assyrians. The following years was a time of great prosper for Cypriots. The time of freedom for Cyprus though was interrupted by the Egyptian conquer in 569 B.C. Egyptian rule though was not depressing at all so the Cypriot civilization continued to grow. In 564 B.C the great king of Persians , Cyrus, conquered East Asia so the plans for rule of Cyprus were inevitable. Cypriot kings recognised the rule so they managed to keep their autonomy. In the beginning of the 5th century B.C two political preferences, the friendly-Persian one and the anti-Persian. King of Salamina Gorgos was a representer of the friendly-persian but
…show more content…
Besides giving the option to Ionians to choose their opponent showed unlimited trust to them, because by this gesture trusted the luck of their own cities and kingdoms in the hands of the Ionians if they would choose the mainland. It is strange that Herodotos doesn’t mention the Cypriot navy as it was known that Cyprus had powerful navy force as they showed some years later (480 BC) empowering Xerxes with approximately 150 ships against the Greeks.
The decisive collision happened in the valley of Salamina where the Persian army gathered with their leader Artyvius. The description of the battle is being given again by Herodotos( History, E 110-113).
The most skilful and better trained Cypriot forces were of those of Salamina and Soloi. These forces lined up in the centre opposite the special forces of Persian. Right and left were the army of the rest Cypriot cities. In the middle of the Persian army was the Persian general Artyvios. Onesilos chose to face Artyvios voluntarily as Herodotus
…show more content…
One of them were the Cypriots that they been forced to march alongside Persians.
Diodoros Sikieliotis(Historical Bookcase, 11.2,1) reports that Xerxes ordered every city that was enslaved by him to make fighting ships. Such cities were the Cypriot, Egyptian, Phoenician, Cicilian, Lycian, Mysian, Karian. Egyptians gave 200 ships, Phoenician gave 300 ships, Cypriots gave 150 ,Cicilian 80. Cypriots not only made the ships but also they were obliged to run them as well so they send an army as well. Some of the Cypriot leaders that participated were Gorgos of Salamina, brother of Onesilos, alongside with his brother Philaon, King of Amathounta Timonax, general Penthylos from the kingdom of Paphos.
The first serious battleship happened near Artemision. Cypriot ships participated in this battleship. Cypriot general Penthylos of Paphos lost 11 out of his 12 ships in a storm except the one that was on it a little before the battleship of Artemision. So he went into the battleship with one ship that in the end was captured by the Greeks. Herodotus(History, Z’195, 1) reports that Penthylos was interrogated by the Greeks for information about Persian army and then he was sent iron binded to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The reasons for the Greek victory against the Persians in 490 to 480/479 BC was a mixture of exceptional leadership, skilful tactics and strategy, superior weapons and soldiers, and Greek unity. Strong leadership was the most important aspect of the Greek defence, as without the intelligence and bravery of the leaders, the Greeks would have been easily defeated. As a result of the excellent leadership; Greek tactics, strategy, and unity were greatly strengthened. Combined with their better weapons and soldiers, the Greeks held the advantage and seized opportunities at the perfect moment. Also, with each victory the Greeks grew more confident of success and defiant of the Persian attempts to invade. The poor organisation and disarray of their enemy led to an undermining of the Persian might and further improved Greece's chances of success.…

    • 2672 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of thermopylae was an important battle for both the persian and greek army, the leader of the persian fleet was Xerxes whose army was far more larger than King Leonidas, leader of the Greek army, but Leonidas was a far more tactical and smarter war general than Xerxes.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cyrus (Kurush), the son of a Persian chieftain and a Median princess, united the various Persian tribes and overthrew the Median monarch around 550 B.C.E.…

    • 3342 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    On thermopylea and platea

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Today I shall be arguing and elaborating upon the thesis that the battle at Thermopylae was instrumental in insuring the victory at Plataea against the Persian army as it allowed for Greece to build up its army’s in preparation for the upcoming battle. I shall attempt to prove this statement by discussing various aspects of the battle of Thermopylae and the battle of Plataea such as battle tactics, size of the Greek and Persian armies and the overall intent and outcome of both battles.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter7Outline

    • 2616 Words
    • 8 Pages

    a. Cambyses, Cyrus’s son, ruled the Persian Empire from 530-522 B.C.E. and conquered all of Egypt by 525 B.C.E.…

    • 2616 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The battle of Thermopylae was the first between the Persians and Greeks during the Persian invasion of 480-479 BC. The Greek force was very small but was determined to make a stand against the huge Persian army. The battle of Thermopylae resulted in a massive loss to the Greeks as the Persian army heavily defeating them.…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    490 B.C. Persian leader, darius I, sent 25,000 men to fight 10,000 Greeks. The Persians were light armored and lacked training, they were no match to the Greeks disciplined phalanx Athens won a crushing victory killing more than 6000 men and only losing less than 200 men The battle took place in a plain north east of Athens called marathon Ionia of the coast of Anatolia is a place where Greeks have been long settled, however around 546 B.C. the Persians conquered the area.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Final Study Guide

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The great Persian invasion under Xerxes was a crucial factor in cementing the ties of Greek ethnicity and a sense of separation from other peoples. It is no accident that the great playwright Aeschylus asked that his tombstone be engraved only with a mention of participation in the war and was content to omit his dramatic victories. What were the causes of this invasion? What was the Persian strategy? How did the Greeks respond to the threat? What were the crucial battles in the war and finally why did the Persians fail?…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks during the Greco-Persian War manipulated terrain as a force multiplier in many battles; at the Battle of Marathon, Miltiades used the Vrana Valley to prevent a Persian march on Athens, at the Battle of Thermopylae, Leonidas used the narrow, Thermopylae pass to invalidate the Persian numbers, and at the Battle of Artemisium, Themistocles used the Artemisium Strait to aid in his battle against the Persian fleets.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Medes settled in the northwest and came under the influence of the ancient centers in Mesopotamia and Urartu.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Greeks had many advantages when it came to storming a beachhead. With experienced pilots and rowers, the ships could be landed in such a formation that allowed the infantry to jump off easily but still provide maximum…

    • 1949 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Even before the war, Themistocles played a key role in creating the circumstances in which a victory might be possible. Themistocles was the advocate for Athenian naval power which eventually played a very important and critical role in the wars. He convinced the Athenians to spend the silver found at Laurion on the production of ships and not gifts for the people. His persuasion led to the building of 200 triremes. Themistocles promoted the land/sea strategy which, in turn, made him a key player in the events surrounding the Battle of Artemisium. By developing Athenian naval forces, he increased Greek naval strength and gave them the upper hand in sea battles where they were usually disadvantaged on land due to Persian cavalry and archery. Modern historian Victor Ehrenberg states that it was Themistocles’ naval policy that determined the course of the century. Themistocles was also heavily involved in the Hellenic league which eventually brought together 31 Greek states to fight against the Persians. By being…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gates of Fire

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Spartans and their allies hold the pass for several days against the onrush of the Persian army. Eventually, a greek traitor leads the Persian Immortals (elite troops of the Persian empire) through a secret mountain pass that allows them to encircle the Spartan position. Leonidas orders the evacuation of all allies,…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thutmose focused his attention to the coastline as he began to use ships to transport his troops into Syria. This saved time and resources as they did not have to march through the hostile desert environment. In order for this to be successful the Egyptian navy needed to upgrade to the best ships possible. “The ships that would transport his force were ideally suited to the task---approximately 60 cubits (102 feet) long and 20 cubits (34 feet) wide and comparable in size, speed, cargo space and tons burden to the average Roman Republican transport. ”(AP 45)…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    After defeating the Persian army in the battle at Granicus, the army moved south searching for the main force. The main force was led by the ruler of Persia, Darius. The battle happens in a narrow area between the gulf of Issus and mountains on November 5, 333 BC. The macedonian army used its phalanx, and Alexander used his tactics to adapt to the situation. The army had a phalanx in the center, hypaspists on the right, and companion cavalry with Alexander riding with them on the flank. On the left was a mix of heavy and light cavalry, with an infantry in reserve. Far right in the hills, the army had agrarians, elite javelin soldiers, and cavalry. The Macedonian army advances, protecting their flank. Alexander led an attack of the agrarians, and managed to drive off the heavy infantry. Meanwhile the rest of the macedonian cavalry on that flank drove off the persian cavalry. On the opposite flank, the Persian heavy cavalry succeeding in pushing back the weaker cavalry of the Macedonian army. Alexander responded to this by using his infantry. The Macedonians with this infantry put up a defensive line against a possible breakthrough. As the Persian line advanced, placing their flank in the air, they left themselves vulnerable. The Agrarians continued to pursue heavy infantry, while the cavalry turned on the flank of the infantry. Alexander in this moment saw Darius and advanced toward him. He believed that by…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays