The squid and the whale, a 1986 movie was directed by Noah Baumback and shot at the park slope in Brooklyn. The movie demonstrated the epic battle that divorces are subjected to and how they normally affect the growth and development of children in the marriage. In the movie, a family is depicted as being subjected to a major crisis as a result of a divorce which results into the development of two camps, with the two children split to support the mother on one hand and the father on the other. The story tells of the problems that a 16 year old adolescent is subjected to as a result of the divorce between their parents. This movie develops a theme of conflict and demonstrates the clashing forces between the dreams of a mother and those of a father on one end and the children on the other (Applegate & Shapiro, 2005). The movie thus depicts the cynical detachment and vulnerability that this divorce subjects both the children and the parents to. It is a competition as the writer sides with the mother and his brother joins his father’s camp. Frank, the main character in the movie swears to support the mother in this epic battle while his brother Walter proudly supports the father despite the wrong advices that the father offers (Caffery & Erdman, 2000). Case description
Frank, a 12 year old teenager is exposed to the ugly face of divorce as his parents, Joan and David cannot live together anymore. At his tender age, frank is open and honest and clear expresses his opinions without fear of retribution. This makes him more vulnerable to emotional torture as compared to his elder brother Walter who decides to stick with the father. The separation of the parents has brought him a feeling of isolation, abandonment and anguish. As a result, he decides to engage in drug abuse behaviors as a way of tolerating the devastating emotional anguish he is facing (Patterson, 2002). Theoretical analysis of the character’s behavior
Frank has been subjected to a challenging environment as he begins his puberty, a stage that is essential in the development of his character. During this phase of development, children struggle to establish their own self-identity in an effort to gain independence from the parents. This explains the number of times frank stands before the mirror to see his reflection and compare it with the events around his life. According to the ecological model and system theory, the development of human beings is influenced by evolutionary and adaptive forces. This makes the environment and the interaction between the character and the environment essential in determining behavior and character (Ungar, 2010). As an active element in development, individuals interact actively with the environment and grow to accommodate the environmental factors. Interaction between individuals and the environment results into goodness of fit which describe the behavior. Through accommodation, an individual develops a niche for himself that is determined by the existing forces. This is descriptive of the environment that Frank was subjected to at a tender of age of 12. At this age, he was not well placed to understand the challenges of the divorce that his parents were planning and this affected his response. While his brother Walter was more adapted to the environment, Frank was poorly capable to handle the situation and therefore adopts other behaviors to enable him survive in the environment (Applegate & Shapiro, 2005). Due to the involving process of divorce, the parents are more involved in their issues and this exposes Frank and his brother to neglect and loneliness. The lost and desperate environment contributes to his current behavior in which he depends on his tennis tutor for emotional and parental advice. Based on the biophysical model, diseases and interruptive behaviors such as alcoholism affect the character of individuals. The development of the...
References: Applegate, J. & Shapiro, J. (2005). Neurobiology for clinical social work: theory and practice, New York: W.W. Norton & company.
Borden, W. (2009). Contemporary psychodynamic theory and practice, Chicago: Lyceum books Inc.
Caffery, T. & Erdman, P. (2000) Conceptualization parent-adolescent conflict: application from systems and attachment theories, the family journal, 8.1, 14-21.
Delgado, R & Jean, S. (2001). Critical race theory: an introduction, New York: New York University press.
Greene, R. (2008). Behavior theory and social work practice, New Brunswick: Aldine transaction.
Kline, C., Gard McGehee, N., Paterson, S., & Tsao, J
Kristja´n K. (2004). Empathy, sympathy, justice and the child, Journal of Moral Education, 33:3, 291-305.
Neal, J., & Neal, Z. P. (2013). Nested or Networked? Future Directions for Ecological Systems Theory. Social Development, 22(4), 722-737. doi:10.1111/sode.12018.
Patterson, J. (2002). Understanding family resilience, journal of clinical physiology, 58.3, 233-246.
Silverstein, R. (1996). Combat-related trauma as measured by ego developmental indices of defenses and identity achievement, the journal of genetic psychology, 167.2, 169-179.
Voydanoff, P. (2001). Conceptualizing community in the context of work and family, community, work & family, 4.2, 133-156.
Westley, F. R., Tjornbo, O., Schultz, L., Olsson, P., Folke, C., Crona, B., & Bodin, Ö. (2013). A Theory of Transformative Agency in Linked Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology & Society, 18(3), 1-16. doi:10.5751/ES-05072-180327.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document