This time it isn’t just a single person faced with a morally challenging situation, this time it’s just people. People that choose not to donate and help children with simple illnesses so they ultimately die due to starvation and lack of strength. Singer believes that if everyone would donate $200 it “would help a sickly two-year-old transform into a healthy six-year-old”. In Singer’s article, he lists two different organizations, Unicef and Oxfam, along with the numbers so that everyone reading will be persuaded to also donated to help children in need. Singer then goes to say that middle-class Americans can certainly donate more than $200. In fact, Singer says that Americans should donate in amounts more like $20,000. Singer comes to this reasoning because “a household with an income of $50,000 spends around $30,000 annually on necessities, according to the Conference Board. . .” Singer believes that whatever is left should be donated to children in need via the two toll free numbers he listed in his
This time it isn’t just a single person faced with a morally challenging situation, this time it’s just people. People that choose not to donate and help children with simple illnesses so they ultimately die due to starvation and lack of strength. Singer believes that if everyone would donate $200 it “would help a sickly two-year-old transform into a healthy six-year-old”. In Singer’s article, he lists two different organizations, Unicef and Oxfam, along with the numbers so that everyone reading will be persuaded to also donated to help children in need. Singer then goes to say that middle-class Americans can certainly donate more than $200. In fact, Singer says that Americans should donate in amounts more like $20,000. Singer comes to this reasoning because “a household with an income of $50,000 spends around $30,000 annually on necessities, according to the Conference Board. . .” Singer believes that whatever is left should be donated to children in need via the two toll free numbers he listed in his