Preview

The Singer Solution to World Poverty Response

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Singer Solution to World Poverty Response
In his essay, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, the author Peter Singer wrote a few hypothetical examples to prove his moral judgments, in which he tried to persuade the readers to give away all the money one spends on luxuries via the example of Bob, a man who spared the innocent kids life trying to save his valuable Bugatti. However, the example of Bob failed to convince me as a good analogy for other people.
First of all, Singer ignored one of the most considerable element in Bob’s scenario that Bob bore the psychological impact of directly seeing the kids killed by a train because he failed to throw a switch, when he suffered the pain of losing his “rare, valuable old car, a Bugatti” which he had “invested most of his savings” and the moral condemnation of sacrificing the innocent kids at the same moment (404). On contrast to Bob’s situation, most people never see the crowd of the poor, suffering from hunger and cold, exposing their gaunt bodies and begging for help. What most people have seen are a few beggars on the street which may be a common scene that people are accustomed to, providing way less psychological impact on people. Mental shock is always a significant element as a motivation to people. When donating 200 dollars to an overseas aid agency, people can never see the kids they are saving; instead, they can merely see their 200 dollars, earned from hours of arduous work, are given away to strangers. Even if the donation is guaranteed to save the kid, people always tend to believe what they see rather than what they hear. So, we can see that it is more likely for Bob to choose a rather provoking one compellingly since he had to see the kids killed or to see his car crashed, which might both bring him considerable metal shock.
Moreover, when people have to make the decision of giving something up to reserve the other, the particular one that stays tends to be more valuable to him or her. When Bob chose to sacrifice the kids, it was obvious

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    They encountered a man on the road that had been struck by lightning and was also suffering from starvation. The boy wanted to turn back and help the wounded stranger, but the man had to explain to the boy that they did not have enough of anything to share with him (McCarthy 49-52). They barely had enough to take care of themselves, and if they gave away anything that they had, they would be more likely to starve. It was a decision between their own lives and others’. There was also another occasion where the man and boy were on the beach and were robbed of most of their belongings (McCarthy). If they did not chase the thief down and retrieve them, they would have most definitely suffered. The thief’s explanation for what he did was because he was starving and didn’t want to die. His needs were not being met either.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In today’s society, many people will value materialistic objects more wanting to have the newest technology or the best brand of electronics rather than helping out a person by just giving them a simple smile. Money is spent on things that are not worth spending that may be useful for another occasion. In the text, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Peter Singer persuades the readers on how many will have the opportunity to help out a charity and donate money, but people will not take the chance or time to do it. In the other text “On Dumpster Diving” Lars Eighner informs the readers when he was a homeless person and he had to go looking for food in different dumpsters. Eighner explains the ways that a homeless person is able to distinguish…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Billionaire Sacrifice

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Singer begins his essay with a simple question, “What is a human life worth?” (578). “Singer suggests that most people would be unwilling to a value on the life another human”. Singer continues the topic by writing about some of the charitable beliefs of Bill Gates and how it was that Gates developed some of those values over time, which was in part due to hearing about a viral infection that kills around five hundred million children each year. Singer then goes on to give a statistic that around a billion people must survive on the equivalent of “less than one U.S. dollar per day” and that “more than ten million children die every year . . . from avoidable, poverty-related…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer enters a new section, entitled “Motivation and Justification”. Starting with chapter 7, he looks deep into the minds of altruists to figure out why they chose this type of lifestyle. What motivates these people to do so much for the sake of others (Singer, 2015, p.75)? The immediate answer Singer first throws out is love, but he later refutes it and proposes empathy as the prime motivation.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within his work, Peter Singer presents an argument that the people who live in affluent countries, the developed world, must drastically change their way of life and their conception of morality in order to help those in need. He begins by giving us an example of a case of famine, Bengal 1971, where people have been suffering and no one was doing anything to even try to alleviate the problem, this includes the government. I have summarized his arguments in the following ways: 1. Suffering caused by the lack of food, shelter, and medical care services is bad, and 2. If we can prevent something bad from happening, without sacrificing something…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The real-world application of Singer’s argument is no doubt difficult to implement, but that cannot be considered a fault due to unreasonable demand. Personal discomfort is to be expected, as Singer’s view on moral obligations and global poverty is uncompromisingly utilitarian. Nevertheless, a minor monetary inconvenience for the affluent should be considered relatively insignificant when compared to the incalculable value of a human life. As there are no major inconsistencies to be seen in Singer’s argumentative framework as a whole, there is merit in accepting his position on the moral obligations towards the global…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer, an Australian philosopher and professor at Princeton University asks his students the simple question of whether they would save a drowning child from a pond, while wearing they’re bran new pair of expensive shoes. The response was aggressive and passive “How could anyone consider a pair of shoes, or missing an hour or two at work, a good reason for not saving a child’s life?” ¹ Singer continued to argue that “ according to UNICEF, nearly 10 million children under five years old die each year from causes related to poverty.” ² Is not saving a child drowning in a pond right in front of you the same thing as a child half way across the world dying in poverty? Peter Singer’s response would be a big yes, he explains his way of thinking in his book “The Life you can Save” it is like the ten commandment of how to end world poverty.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Singer’s goal in his article is to inform people of the famine of a Bengal, starving country, how they can decrease the starvation of a society if contributions were given by all individuals or those with the greater financial statuses. Singer suggests that it should be moral to help those in need without causing the same effect upon them. Singer gives three counter-arguments that explain his ideas on the fact for his moral reasoning. Singer states, “he shall argue that the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation like that in Bengal cannot be justified; indeed, the whole way we look at moral issues—our moral conceptual scheme—needs to be altered, and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken for granted in our society” (Singer, 1972). Singer’s argument can be summed as:…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    However, John Arthur disagrees with Singer’s conclusion in his piece, “World Hunger and Moral Obligation: The Case against Singer” and believes that although we should help those in need, it is not imperative to do so. John Arthur’s argument in basic form looks like this:…

    • 1804 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the New York Times Article “ the Singer Solution to World Poverty” the author Peter Singer argues that there is no reason why Americans don’t donate money to the needy when they can afford countless of luxury that are not essential to the preservation of their lives and health. Singer pursue the audience with two different situations trying to motivate the reader to donate money instantly.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response to Peter Singer

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyday wealthy and middle class Americans across the country spend money on luxury items such as: flat screen televisions, laptop computers, digital cameras, fancy cars, and smart phones. At the same time, across the globe in poverty stricken countries, people and children are living in destitution. Many of these people lack a basic human need which commonly includes nutrition, healthcare, education, clothing, shelter, and clean water. Peter Singer, author of 'The Singer Solution to World Poverty', suggests that all Americans that are financially stable to donate should be donating all their non-essential money to the needy people across the globe. This seems like the morally right thing to do, however Singers argument overlooks many factors in his bias, and leaves to many questions unanswered to make his essay true or reasonable to any extent. Is it morally right to make a hardworking American give up all luxuries to the needy people they will never meet? Of course, Americans should feel the need to donate to the needy people of our world. Although the amount they donate should be entirely up to them.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author use ethos by claiming he is a utilitarian philosopher. He judges whether acts are wrong or right by their consequences. He further claimed, if the outcome of the American’s failure to donate the money, one more kid dies then there is a troubling incongruity in being quick to condemn other’s action like of Dora, who took a child to an organ peddler for cash. 4. Singer used logos by using information such reasonable estimates that $200 in donation would help a sickly 2-year-old into a healthy 6-year-old.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author, being both a scholar and a philosopher, has a smooth writing style, and it shows. He invokes just the right amount of inquiry, logic, and writes with such an authority that it becomes easy to not question both his statistics and the evidence he either omitted, or did not realize. Due to this, Singer’s argument itself is markedly effective, making it is easy to feel compelled from the points he makes, and the illustrations he uses. He invokes strong feelings of guilt, and assigns a social liability for the welfare of those less fortunate, but his support is ultimately less than pragmatic. While Singer’s intentions are pure, and to such a degree are worth of some merit, simple logically analysis of much of his deductively supported report shows his solution is impractical. This is not to say Singer is not on to something, indubitably his opinion has many good components, and following his advice certainly can do much good, but conclusively I can not accept it as a ‘solution’ to world poverty, and his efforts would likely be more valuable directed towards more specific…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays