During the Seven Year’s War and the American Revolution, the Indians were limited by choice to be proponents of one side. This brought about divisions among the Indian tribes. Whatever the case, the Indians gained no freedom or rights from neither the American Revolution nor the Seven Years of War.
As Colloway (p.152) puts it, “Some tribes split into factions over issues of peace, war, and alliance with competing European powers.” Caught in the middle of such war, the Eastern Woodland Indians had limited options and faced severe internal and external aggressive forces.
Being caught up in the Seven Years of War, both the Indians and the French war provoked the Eastern Indians “fighting on both sides besides European armies, as well as fighting against European armies invading Indian country” (Colloway, p. 145). At that time, the Indians faced different waves and forces that pushed and pulled them to opposite sides for no apparent reasons. It is quite unfortunate that upon Britain’s triumph of the Seven Years’ of War, the Indians were left with nothing much to benefit from the …show more content…
155). Worse still, a commander from the British army had the audacity to send to the Indians blankets infected with smallpox. Moreover, the Indians suffered a vast loss of their already developed lands after the war was over to European settlers. This only triggered further conflict among the Eastern Indians themselves. The war tone Indian land consequently led to the American Revolution. Based on the preconceived notion that consumed the Indians into believing that the war was an heightened contest for both the Indians and the Americans to gain independence, majority of them sidelined with the British militia in the hope of regaining their lost land and freedom. Apparently this was not any close to the result they so hoped for. The hash consequences brought about by the Revolution only introduced much suffering and civil war among the Indians themselves (Colloway, p,