He talks about people's roots how migrants have a hard time planting them in a new place, saying, "these migrants drag their exposed roots and have trouble putting them down in new places" (Stegner 200). He uses this to argue his point that people should stay put for a while and let their roots grow and become planted before picking up and moving again. However, he goes on to say that, "some people don't want to put [their roots] down The American home is often a mobile home" (Stegner 200-201). Our way of life is one where we are restless and "hooked on change" (Stegner 204). Americans enjoy the constant change of scenery and do not mind that our roots never take hold in the soil, as Stegner wants us to do. We just pick up and move, never allowing ourselves to get to know the land on which we lived or are living. He then makes a comparison of a "displaced person" and a river's current, saying, "[A displaced person] has a current like the Platte, a mile wide and an inch deep" (Stegner 200). A displaced person moves quickly like the river current, though never stays in one place for a long time, similarly to the inch of water skimming over the rocks. Stegner goes on to say that the displaced person is, "acquainted with many places, [but] is rooted in none" (Stegner 200). The person does not believe he is lacking anything. On the contrary, he is content …show more content…
All of these men are prominent iv the literary society, one wanders if there is a reason for Stegner to include them in his essay other then to strengthen his argument. I believe he added many to boost his ranking and status among his readers. There is a small community of authors who write about nature and likewise the community of readers is about the same size. Therefore, it makes sense that Stegner used Thoreau's highly known name to increase the validity and importance of his essay. Same with the way he used Robert Frost's quote, "The land was ours before we were the lands" (Stegner 206) to sum up his essay. He is taking a poem by Robert Frost, a world-renowned poet, and adding it to the end of his essay. It does fit in nicely, but I feel there is also another motive, to gain more respect from his