The second amendment, the right to bear arms, was adopted on December 15, 1791. In that day in age, guns were not as powerful as they have become, and many who created the Bill of Rights could not have predicted the future. If the constitution, or Bill of Rights, had been written with the knowledge of today’s weapons the Second Amendment would be different. Now in the 21st century there have been many cases where the Second Amendment has been brought into question. These cases have brought questions that deal with the amendment having been written for civilians, but also the worry of the advancements that have been made in weaponry since the time the Second Amendment was written. One case that has been a landmark in challenging the …show more content…
The National Firearms Act only imposed an authority tax, but it has been assumed that Congress had an underlying purpose to prohibit transactions in these certain firearms. This can be seen through that statement made saying, “The Act was a response to gangster-era violence, which Prohibition fueled. The Act attempted to ban gangster weapons, most notably the Thompson submachine gun” (LEIDER 220). The Thompson submachine gun was created in 1918 by General John T. Thompson, but was eventually modified for nonmilitary use in 1919. Citizens possessed this gun, and “Auto Ordnance sold its submachine guns through every legal outlet it could. A Thompson submachine gun could be purchased either by mail order, or from the local hardware or sporting goods stores” (“Thompson Submachine Gun." 1 ). Referring back to The United States Supreme Court vs. Miller, the defendant, challenged the National Firearms Act of 1934, explaining that it was an unconstitutional violation of the Second Amendment. But the Supreme Court of the United States described that the Second Amendment stating, “The Constitution does not grant the privilege to racketeers and desperadoes to carry weapons of the character …show more content…
Nowadays there are academic research articles talking about “increasing firepower, with a slight increase in size and the use of the appropriated ammunition judiciously combining the traditional, consecrated method of sending the ballistic projectiles to the target using the energy of throwing powder from a cartridge-tube, with a new type of ammunition, the active projectiles, the reactive and self-propelled bullets, even for the weapons with small caliber” (Cozma 1567). The ideas for advancements in guns continue to increase, but this isn’t what the writers of the Constitution and Second Amendment had in mind when they thought of the future. Guns and firepower are becoming too advanced for some citizens to understand, but most people don’t want to stop creating new guns, because they feel as though this increases safety. A contradiction to this statement has been found. New, plastic, guns have recently been discovered, but there is no such thing as safety here. Although it’s fascinating that these plastic guns can be made by a 3D printer in less than twenty-four hours, "when these 3-D firearms are manufactured, some of the weapons can defeat normal detection such as metal detectors, wands, and it could present a problem to public safety in a venue such as an airport, an arena, a courthouse" (Johnson

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitutional right quoted above all else is the second amendment: the right to bear arms. Many have been harmed directly and indirectly through legal fire arms. The second amendment is put up to debate after numerous hate crimes and school shootings. What if stricter restrictions had been implemented concerning gun purchases, the guns might not have been…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment is one of the best rules that our forefathers gave us when they wrote the constitution. It allows the people to have some sort of defense if the government decides to rise against it’s own people. However the weapons that middle class people can own are nothing but amazing. The second amendment is good; however…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cottrol, Robert, ed. Gun Control and the Constitution: Sources and Explorations on the Second Amendment. New York: Garland Publishing Inc., 1994 [2] Dowlut, Robert. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms in State Bills of Rights and Judicial Interpretation. SAF 1993 [3] Freedman, Warren. The Privilege to Keep and Bear Arms. Connecticut: Quorum Books, 1989 [4] Hickok, Eugene Jr., ed. The Bill of Rights: Original Meaning and Current Understanding. Virginia: University Press of Virginia,…

    • 2205 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second Amendment states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. Every person has a different view on the Second Amendment. Is it a legitimate right or has it already fulfilled its purpose? I believe in the right as it has been established, however it needs provisions. A rising conflict in the United States is the right to bear arms. You’re either pro-Second Amendment or anti-Second Amendment…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    English Essay – Persuasive nd The 2 Amendment states that American citizens have the right to bear arms (own a gun). This issue is topical due to the recent school shootings such as Sandy Hook Elementary in December 2012. However it must be argued that there are good and bad arguments about nd nd the 2 Amendment. Ultimately that the 2 Amendment should have tighter gun laws in America because of tragic incidents like the Sandy Hook Elementary school where many young children and t…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right to Bear Arms The Second Amendment reflects the right of all Americans to own weapons for a legal purpose, such as self-defense in the home. It also recognizes the need for weapons to ensure safety for the citizens and keep a well-regulated militia. The prefatory clause refers to the concept of the militia being allowed to bear arms for the safety of the state. The operative clause is very controversial, as it discussed the average citizens ability to own a weapon. The District of Columbia…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Right to Bear Arms

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Right to Bear Arms The second amendment clearly states “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” It definitely says that it is the right of the people to keep and bear arms, therefore doesn’t that make it an individual right. After all would people not feel safer if they are able to carry a handgun on them for self-defense? Just try and picture somebody walking down the sidewalk and…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Right to Bear Arms

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Second Amendment of the Constitution: The Right to Bear Arms The American Constitution was a book of laws that gave a brief explanation of the American Dream. In the Constitution, there were ten laws that were considered the “Civil Rights,” and one of these laws laid commonly questioned and tested. The second Amendment of the Constitution: the right to bear arms was a very significant law in the American Constitution, since it has two sides of opinion. Many Americans consider that people…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Right to Bear Arms

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Right to Bear Arms Introduction The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution reads, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." ("Second Amendment to the United States Constitution"). Today, the interpretation of the amendment has polarized the American people among two different views (Greenslade, 2004). Those opposed to private ownership of firearms agrue that there…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control and the Second Amendment have been in the new and at the forefront of American conversation in the last several months. The largest topic in this discussion is, what does the Second Amendment say, what does it mean, and does it still apply today. The main viewpoints of this argument really come from each group’s interpretation of the verbiage that makes up the Second Amendment. One group takes a universal human right to bear arms approach, while another group takes an approach that…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays