Preview

The Second Amendment: Current Background Checks

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1011 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Second Amendment: Current Background Checks
Although the Second Amendment stops the federal government from entirely banning guns in America, limited restrictions are permitted on the possession and distribution of firearms. The ease of obtaining a firearm in America fosters a dangerous environment and crime. Hence, the Second Amendment should be reinterpreted so that sterner gun laws can be implemented because current background checks are flawed, gun accessibility has been abused by foreign and domestic criminals, and some people cannot handle guns responsibly.
An example of current background checks is they are not always enforced properly was the recent attempted assassination of Assembly woman Gabriella Giffords. The shooter, Jared Loughner, was initially turned away from purchasing
…show more content…
Some gun advocates claim that they carry guns as a form of self-protection. However, this has been scientifically proven to be untrue. A study done by the University of Pennsylvania on the 677 shootings over the span of two and a half years indicate that people who carry guns are 4.5 times more likely to be shot than an unarmed person, and 4.2 times more likely to be killed by a gun (Callaway). The author claims that the reason for these statistics is that guns give people false senses of empowerment that make them overreact in volatile situations (Callaway). Carrying a gun not concealed is like painting a bull’s-eye(s) on oneself rather than self-defense, especially when it might foster delusions of empowerment. Even statics discourage gun possession; through legislating stricter gun laws, this can ensure public …show more content…
Someone needs to step back and stop thinking so rigidly. Is following the Constitution word for word worth the lives of innocent children? Someone must also question the amount of "self-defense" a gun provides, when a person carrying a gun is four times more likely to be shot and killed than a normal person. Though some understand that the Second Amendment is a civil right and plainly stated in the Constitution. Is it too much to ask to limit this freedom in a safer environment where people do not have to constantly worry about crazed gunmen. After all, some people would never want to be in a country where they are constantly in danger of being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Research

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Second Amendment states “"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Bill of Rights). It was adopted on December 15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. Americans felt that the right to arms was important for different reasons such as stopping invasions, participating in law enforcement, enabling the people to organize a militia system, preventing an undemocratic government, etc. Later into the twentieth century, a debate had grown about. The question most frequently being asked in many different words are, is the amendment that was created to ensure the continuation and successful of the state militias as a means of defense, or was it created to ensure an individual’s right to own a firearm. People, gun control advocates, began to read the second amendment concerned with rising violence in society and the role firearms play in that violence. While on the other side, firearm enthusiasts saw the attacks on gun ownership as attacks on freedom and defended their interpretation of the second amendment just as aggressively. Much of the debate that is going on today is centered on how the amendment was phrased and no…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The implementation of the second amendment serves as a means to protect oneself against governmental tyranny. Gun ownership gives citizens the power to check governmental and police abuses. Due to increased violation of this very amendment citizens have allowed for the second amendment to be under scrutiny for further adjustments. Why should certain rights be under stricter governmental control without completely taking those rights away? People who abuse those rights make it difficult for the law abiding citizens to lead lives with less fear. Stricter laws and regulations will decrease the number of crimes. A survey taken in 2010 shows that Roughly 16,272 murders were committed in the United States. Of these, about 10,886 or 67% were committed with firearms. As of 2012 neighborhoods have seen an increase in crime rates in the States that allow for concealed permit handgun holders. A recent incident involving two neighbors involved in a shooting where both individuals were killed by the other in a confrontation. Both had the right to carry a concealed weapon and both died by that same right. To improve on such happenings such as this, government laws and restrictions will bring down if not take away incidents such as these where people are not only misusing their rights but making it…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    citizens feel that the Second Amendment is necessary and is still relevant today. The supporters of the amendments have claimed that having the right to bear arms provides them with a sense of security and safety. As supported by 2001 National Gun Policy Survey of the National Opinion Research Center conducted by Tom W. Smith, “Most gun carries indicate that they feel safer carrying a handgun (59%). “ This 59 percentage of people feels that carrying a gun with them gives them a sense of satisfaction in terms of their safety. However, a more recent study has contrasted this survey with the support of events that take place everyday. According to the study conducted by the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, “Members of the public who carry guns risk escalating everyday disagreements into public shootouts, especially in places where disputes frequently occur—in bars, at sporting events, or in traffic.” This demonstrates the risk caused by the Second Amendment as it creates dangers for the people. The availability of guns or the right to bear arms has made the public areas a danger for everybody. As the study reports, people carrying guns have utilized the advantage of using them for their benefits in small arguments resulted by disagreements. An example that verifies this study is the incidents that too place in 2014, where a retired police officer who carried a legal concealed handgun murdered a man for a mere disagreement. The officer shot…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No other amendments in the United States Constitution has caused as much controversy as the Second Amendment. The amendment states that the people of America are allowed to bare arms and maintain a well regulated militia. This has caused a lot of controversy and issues with gun control in recent years. The Second Amendment should be amended in order to have more rules, regulations, and provide a safer America for people. People in favor of guns suggest that there is a need for guns for all citizens to protect people from the government. However, violence is a large issue today with guns and weapons. The Founding Father’s were building America with a more liberal perspective that envisioned a free society where individuals protected their own property and person with minimal interference from the government. In today’s society America has built a stronger military and police force where people do not need as many weapons in their homes with such high power.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second amendment is an exceedingly controversial amendment in the constitution. The amendments right to bear arms was “instituted within the Bill of Rights to suppress insurrection, participate and uphold the law, enable the citizens of the United States to organize a militia, and to facilitate the natural right to self-defense” (Logan). Some citizens suggest the analysis of the “right of people” shows that it protects the individual rights of citizens to own personal guns. From whatever some “citizens” may assume the second amendment to be, it establishes defense, protection, and safety among each citizen. The intents of the second amendment is to delineate upon the freedom of each individual. Moreover, this personal liberty prevents citizens from tyranny and oppressive governing. People have the right to make their own choices and whatever he or she decides to do with that right is up to them. However, one should not use the second amendment to put others in danger like Chris Mercer, the shooter at Umpqua Community College in Oregon. The second amendment justifies individual liberties for people to protect themselves in all cases. From the shooting that occurred at an Oregon community college, the nation’s second amendment has been the topic of debate.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anti Gun Control

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Statistics show that there are, by far, more people defending themselves with gun use than there are people committing crimes with the use of guns. Per 100,000 people only 10.22 of them have committed a crimes where a gun was involved. (Lott 12) in the United States there are 80,000 to 82,000 defensive uses of guns during assaults, robberies and household burglaries. Out of the 1,000,000 times guns are used for defensive reasons in the world 400,000 of theses cases have saved lives or prevented lives from being taken. (Lott 2) The use of guns by law-abiding citizens may create a positive externality for others. Therefore,…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second Amendment States, " A well regulated Militia being necessary to the Security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. If the anit-gun lobby can abolish the Second Amendment, then they can abolish any of them if we give them the power to do away with one. This includes freedom of speech, press, and religion, the right against self-incrimination, and unwarranted search and seizure. Not only did our Founding Fathers focus their debate on the right of people to keep and bear arm, they devoted considerable energy to issuing a warning to future generations that the battle to defend theses freedoms will take precedence over other work, yet in recent years were anit-gun politicians have attempted to control guns in the name of crime prevention. Address all crime and just crime with guns. To date no gun law has been proven to reduce crime or homicides, not even the Brady Law and the " Clinton Crime Bill' by foes of private firearms ownership was no fluke, many years of patient, deliberate work went into their anit-gun game plane that was formulated more than a decade ago. With those two laws it still did not keep guns out of criminals hands. Using FBI statistics accumulated on a country level, Lott shows that in state that have strict gun control laws, there are higher crime rates, and in states with liberal gun carry laws, there are much lower…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America recently witnessed their largest mass-shooting in Orlando, Florida; which brought up many arguments over whether not America needs more laws restricting the use and ownership of firearms. Liberals have been arguing the Second Amendment does not grant citizens the right to bear arms, only militias. Another controversy would be that additional gun control laws are necessary to prevent gun violence. Conservatives believe in the opposite, and often argue the Founding Fathers made the Second Amendment so citizens may use guns for self-defense. Although many believed the Second Amendment does not grant citizens the right to bear arms, our Founders wrote the Constitution and viewed it as “a natural right, given by God and not to be impaired…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On April 19, 1775 King George the Third took away Americans guns, in order to stop a revolution, this left Americans defenseless. The Founding Fathers decided that this shouldn’t happen, and included an amendment in the Bill of Rights, that would prevent this from ever happening again. The Second amendment focuses on Americans rights to own firearms. Thus, causing a major enduring impact on the citizens of the United States of America.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Background checks are meant to serve as a way to ensure the people owning a firearm are responsible and capable of owning a weapon. Even though background checks are occurring there are still millions of irresponsible people in possession of a firearm. There needs to be tighter restrictions during the background check for people to purchase a gun. Many individuals who suffer from mental illness get their hands on guns and use the weapons for mass destruction instead of its intended purpose of…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are multiple ways to make background checks harder so murderers and the mentally unfit are unable to get guns. Instead of only the store giving background checks, they should have more than one background check so it would make it much harder for any one to get guns. Also the people selling the guns should be given background checks too, just to make sure that there clean people too and are not trying to get rid of a gun that has been used to kill somebody already. one example of poor background checks is the night shooting at the club in Orlando, Florida. “An FBI spokesman didn't respond to a request for comment about whether the gun seller made the required check. However, it's unlikely it would have raised any red flags.” Making background checks harder will help with all the on going events happening through the United…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    gun control

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the past few years so many lives have been lost due to guns in the hands of the wrong people. There have been many debates weather or not the United States should have stricter gun laws. Due to recent tragedies like the shooting in Newtown Connecticut there should be limits to the second amendment right to bear arms, because stricter laws is always the best way to prevent crimes.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Laws

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Second Amendment in the United States Constitution gives people the right to keep and bear arms. The Second Amendment has been interpreted in many ways, and its limitations and what it controls have been questioned. The question that arises over and over again is that will stricter gun laws make the United States safer or more perilous. The answer is clear. With lack of gun control and that black market guns are at almost every street corner whether you think it or not. Guns are a very dangerous weapons, and the United States has to create stricter laws in order to operate and obtain them in order to protect the public.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Laws

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages

    “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear Arms should not be infringed”(Nisbet 12). This simple sentence of the Second Amendment has brought many different ideas into America about firearm laws. Our founding fathers wrote this in the Bill of Rights under the Constitution. This Second Amendment allows for citizens of the United States to bear, obtain, or own, firearms such as handguns and/or long guns, at least that is what most Americans believe. Gun laws are scrutinized, then passed or rejected; this has been happening for decades. When it comes to firearms, America has some of the most lenient policies that lead to many violent crimes, fatalities, and misconceptions of firearms.…

    • 2847 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics