The Sandy Hook Massacre and Its Effects on Gun Control
The Sandy Hook Massacre is the second deadliest shooting by a single person in American history. According to CNN, this tragic attack took place at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. The shooter, Adam Lanza, brought three guns into the school, two of which were pistols, and one of which was an assault rifle. To get into the building, which had an updated security system, he shot his own way into the building with his assault weapon. Lanza ended up murdering twenty-six people. Twenty of the twenty-six were six and seven year olds. As the first authorities approached him, Adam Lanza shot himself in the head, committing suicide (CNN 1-2).
Today, especially after the Connecticut shooting, there is an argument over the right to bear arms. One portion of the argument focuses on whether or not people even have this right. As stated by Michael Sommers, the second amendment reads: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” (Sommers 42) When the second amendment was written and passed, there was no professional army, only a civilian militia. But now that our country has trained, armed forces instead of a militia, does the second amendment still apply?
US v. Miller was the only Supreme court case in which the decision could have limited people’s rights according to the second amendment. Frank Layton and Jack Miller had transported sawed-off shotguns across a state border without proper registration. The state court had let Miller and Layton free on the grounds that the federal law, the Nation Firearms Act of 1934, infringed upon the people’s right according to the second amendment. According to Justia, the court argued that the act didn’t violate the amendment because: In the absence of any evidence tending to show that possession or use of a "shotgun having a barrel...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document