November 9th, 1917
During the Russian Revolution in 1917, a successful party called the Bolsheviks came to power. The Bolsheviks were born out of Russia’s social democratic party led by Vladimir Lenin. The Bolshevik party obtained power by total drive of character and the support of the disappointed soldiers, sailors, peasants and factory workers who were organized into Soviets. They grabbed the support of these various social classes by making promises such as: giving land and power to the peasants and they would improve working conditions and lifestyles of those who worked in the industrial cities. The Bolsheviks would rise to the occasion and succeed because of their leader Lenin. Lenin believed that a leader of the working class had to be one of power with the capabilities of doing things that someone without power could not do. He did this by developing a set of ideas that would appeal the working class and catch the interest in the Bolshevik party. Lenin’s ideas made sure to appeal both the rural and urban areas as well as the two biggest social groups in Russia. Novemember 1917, the beginning of the Strom of the Winter Palace in Russia. The Bolshevik party was ready, a blank shot fired signaled workers and soldiers to storm of the winter palace, the current residence of the democratic, but largely inefficient Provisional Government. Most of the ministers were arrested and thus began 73 long years of Communist rule.
In the fist article that I read and analyzed, “Russia’s Critical Hour”, The Times of London (London), 11/09/1917, p. 7., it seems as if the English people have lost all hope in Russia. In the beginning of the news article it talks about how if you have been keeping up with the news about Russia lately, that this will be no surprise to you. “When constituted authority is palpably incapable of backing words by deeds, when anarchy is allowed to increase daily, when arms are recklessly given to the mob, then the end cannot be far off.” The English people believe that the revolution was always coming; it was the fact when it was coming. It was clear that the Russian government was losing control daily and that Revolution was not far from here. They present the Revolution as a lost cause. Government officials in Russia are doing what they can to detain such acts but nothing will help. Allies of Russia can do nothing but sit back and hope for the best possible outcome. The English think of it as True Russia’s end and that “ We can only await the event, confident that in the end the honor of Russia, her proved military valor, her instinct for decent and orderly life, will their proper influence.” I think that the revolution was significantly important to the English people, because one of the main European powers was undergoing a revolution that would lead to the communist party. In the other text, “Marvin Perry, Western Civilization: ideas, politics, and society (Boston, MA: Houghton and Mifflin, 2005), p. 723-727”, it is quite similar to the news article in the London Times. In Perry’s version it also talks about how the home front of Russia began to fall apart and how the soldiers and civilians had lost trust in their autocratic government. In the text it says” Strikes, Riots in the food lines, and street demonstrations in Petrograd flared into sudden unpremeditated Revolution.” I would say that the Presentation of the Revolution in the Perry Text differed from the London Times because the London Times attitude toward the Revolution was that they were incapable of doing anything and this is Russia’s end versus the way Perry describes it as just another rule in Russian History.
In the Second news Article, Petrograd correspondent “Growth of Maximalist Influence”, The Times of London (London), 11/09/1917,p.5, it talks about the events that led to the formation of the Bolsheviks and their protests. It focuses more on the detail that Kerensky and Korniloff did to prevent the uprising of the Bolsheviks in...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document