Preview

The Role Of Ulysses S. Grant In The American Civil War

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
545 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Ulysses S. Grant In The American Civil War
The Confederacy, commanded by Ulysses S. Grant, is recognized as a major deciding factor in the history of United States. The Civil War began in 1861 and determined the kind of nation that the United States would become. There were many factors that triggered the Civil War, but the main reason was the differences in opinion if blacks should be free or slaves. Slavery had increased heavily in the Southern United States after the creation of the Cotton Gin. By the end of the American Revolution, slavery was dying in the North and South because it had been proven unprofitable. Grant was chosen as the commander of the North during the Civil War because he had proved himself to Lincoln and demonstrated battle skills in prior wars such as the Mexican-American war.
Southern America was winning the majority of significant battles in the early years of the Civil War. President
…show more content…
He was a master at the art of war and used this as an advantage to defeat Lee, a very tough opponent who was a genius at reading the enemies’ minds. Grant’s instinct for seeing the battlefield as a whole and doing what needed to be done was outstanding. He was very intelligent and clear-minded general who could break down difficult problems into parts that were simple to understand. He had the attitude of a winner, and the necessary talent to win the war.
Robert E. Lee was constantly intimidated by Union cavalry and forced to give up the Confederate capital of Richmond. He decided to stop the war because he knew that this was a defeating disadvantage. His resources were winding up and he did not want to risk the few men that were left. Lee had no option but to surrender. By the spring of 1865, General Robert E. Lee surrendered his troops to general Ulysses S. Grant, effectively ending the American Civil War. The next step would be to begin the process of rebuilding a United States free of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Slavery affected many of the political reasons that contributed to causing the Civil War in 1961. Most in the Northern states including President Lincoln were more concerned with preserving the Union rather than fighting for the freedom of all. On the other hand the South fought to preserve what they believed to be absolute state rights. However the overall goals of the war were altered significantly by the willingness of African Americans during war. This also later contributed to the new culture and politics that followed.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Robert E. Lee gained stoic and legendary status as the heart and soul of the South in the Civil War, but many did not know his reasons and feelings for fighting the war. War and the slaughter of others did not interest Lee and he felt compassion for the Union. Lee had contradictory feelings towards war and says, "He was not only to serve in it but he was to lead…

    • 2569 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grant’s Total War policy seemed to be working, with the Confederate war machine losing its ability to wage war more and more each day. By the time Sherman got through South Carolina Lee’s army was the only one left of any size or ability to react to the Union onslaught.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lee’s letter to the president. The letters were sent on July 4 and August 8. Robert E. Lee felt like he failed everybody in south with the lost at Gettysburg. This probably happen because the south did not won’t to conquer the north; they just wanted to be their own country and continue slavery. The only battle that was fought in the north was Gettysburg. The general Robert E. Lee marched to the north for two reasons and they wanted to conquer the north or scare them into giving up the fight.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bullets rained down on the men as they trampled over the enemy, battling their way to victory at the command of their beloved general. During the Civil War, Soldiers greatly admired their generals. After the Civil War ended in 1865, Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant emerged as two of the most distinguished generals in American history. Robert E. Lee, a devoted Virginian, fought for the Confederacy. Ulysses S. Grant, a hero of the Mexican War, led the Union. The two generals fought relentlessly for their side to win the war, but the question still stands, a question that historians and the general public have debated over since the civil war era. Who was the superior general? Although both Civil War generals were strong, well-known leaders, and even though…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Union officer William Tecumseh Sherman observed to a Southern friend that, "In all history, no nation of mere agriculturists ever made successful war against a nation of mechanics. . . .You are bound to fail." While Sherman 's statement proved to be correct, its flaw is in its assumption of a decided victory for the North and failure to account for the long years of difficult fighting it took the Union to secure victory. Unquestionably, the war was won and lost on the battlefield, but there were many factors that swayed the war effort in favor of the North and impeded the South 's ability to stage a successful campaign.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts,” written by Bruce Catton compares and contrasts the characteristics and lives of two leaders of the Civil War. Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee, two very strong and very different generals, met on April 9, 1865 at Appomattox Court House in Virginia to bring to a close the Civil War. By this time, America had become a country that was starting over with the simple core belief in equal rights for everyone.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How much did the similarities and differences between Robert. E. Lee and Ulysses Grant affect the outcome of the Wilderness Campaign during the American Civil War…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert E Lee Thesis

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Robert E. Lee was a Confederate General in the American Civil War. He was born January 19, 1807 in Stratford, Westmoreland County, Virginia. He was the youngest son of the Revolutionary War hero general Henry Lee, who was also known as “Light-Horse Harry Lee”. He married Mary; daughter of G. W. P. Custis, the adopted son of Washington. My Thesis is that Robert E. Lee was a great general in the Civil War. He proved he was great even though his resources usually were not.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    At the appomattox courthouse Grant wants Lee to surrender but Robert E. Lee says no because he believes he can still win the war. Then Robert E Lee leaves the courthouse then comes back because Grant had taken Robert E Lee's food stasch and his soldiers were starving. So at the courthouse Grant says you can keep your small firearms and if you have a horses you can also keep them. Then he also says to Robert E Lee you will not be disturbed on your way home then grant gives Lee and his soldiers food and Robert E. Lee and his army was on their way. Robert E Lee's 2 failures were Maryland Antietam and Gettysburg Pennsylvania. In Maryland Robert E Lee believes if he wins it will be a threat to Washington. Robert E Lee wanted to split his army…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert E Lee Failure

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robert E. Lee was a General for the Confederate army. Lee had always been committed to his obligations in the military. “In 1846, Lee got the chance he’d been waiting his whole military career for when the United States when to war with Mexico. Serving under General Winfield Scott, Lee distinguished himself as a brave battle commander and brilliant tactician.” (Biogrpahy.com). General Scott thought highly of Lee. But, Lee’s life away from battle was difficult for him to handle. He just didn’t know what to do with his life since he was so engulfed in the battle(s). “In 1859 Lee returned to the Army, accepting a thankless position at a lonely cavalry outpost in Texas. In October of that year, Lee got a break when he was summoned to put an end to a slave insurrection led by John Brown at Harper’s Ferry. Lee’s orchestrated attack took just a single hour to end the revolt, and his success put him on a short list of names to lead the Union Army should the nation go to war.” (Biography.com).…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grant assured a Union victory by engaging in a policy of total war, vigorously and continuously attacking Confederate resources and supply lines. He, along with generals William Tecumseh Sherman and David Hunter, raided cities, destroyed farms, railroads, factories and shipyards, and liberated slaves, having realized the inability of the south to recover from such losses (Haines 19; Surdam 115; Buhl; Black Soldiers in the Civil War). The most famous such raids were those on Atlanta and Savannah, Georgia, in which Sherman destroyed all machinery and buildings beneficial to the Confederate cause. So fervent, indeed, were the efforts of Union soldiers during this period, that the soldiers were described as attacking “like famished wolves [...], breaking locks and whatever is in their way[,]” by Dolly Burge, a Savannah plantation owner. The South could, quite simply, not afford to loose these resources (Buhl). In fact, Confederate soldiers were described having “gone without rations for several days” at the time of Confederate General Robert E. Lee’s surrender (Plante). Through taking away Confederate supplies, Grant and his subordinates were able to do what prior generals could not, and utilize Union advantages. The effectiveness of total war is even still recognized by military strategists today, resulting in its usage in the modern world.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    General Robert E. Lee was considered to be one of the finest military strategists in American history. However, he had several disadvantages at Gettysburg that greatly impacted the fate of the Confederate Army in the American Civil War, and eventually led to the surrender of the Confederacy. General Lee’s main disadvantages at Gettysburg included a deficiency of information from the calvary due to General J.E.B. Stuart’s absence and Pickett’s Charge being miscalculated and an act of desperation.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Different in character and style. The article by Bruce Catton indicates that the two generals met on the April 9, 1985 with the aim of essentially negotiating on the end of the Civil War. By principle, the Americans believed in equal rights for all. Lee, Virginia held some traditional beliefs characteristic of his upbringing. The general had his belief rooted in the notion and belief that having inequality in the society’s set of social categories could be of great significance and advantageous…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “My failures have been errors in judgment, not of intent.” This is one of many quotes stated by Ulysses S. Grant during his presidency. Presidents make up a big part of our country. Ulysses S. Grant, the 18th president of the United States, was a very good leader because he was a military general as well as a president and left a legacy. (“Ulysses S. grant Quotes,” brainyquote.com)…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays