Preview

The Role Of Reconstruction In William Shakespeare's Hamlet

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
555 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Reconstruction In William Shakespeare's Hamlet
The facts with which I shall present today are quite contrary to my good friend the Senator of Massachusetts, Mr. Sumner. May I quote William Shakespeare's Hamlet; “We know what we are, but know not what we may be.” With that being said, the concept of reconstruction is fraught with great difficulty. We simply must begin with disorganized and discordant elements, despite the embarrassment of the fact that we differ among ourselves over the mode, manner, and means of reconstruction. We all agree that the rebel region is out of their proper relation with the Union; and that the sole object of the government in regard to those States is to read it them to the union once the conflict has ceased. I believe it is not only possible, but in fact, easier to do this, without deciding, or even considering, whether these States have ever been out of the union whatsoever. Let us all join in doing the acts necessary to restoring the proper practical relations between these States and the Union; and each forever after, innocently indulge his own opinion whether, in doing the acts, he brought the States from without, into the Union, or only gave them proper assistance, they never having been out of it.

I have previously suggested to Congress the 10 Percent Plan, which has been
…show more content…
By electing me as president, the people chose for power to be exercised with principle. The Senator is right in one assertion, that I do wish to reunite the North and the South, but not at the sacrifice of social change. However, one must understand social change cannot be forced upon the South like it is some conquered foreign nation; such oppression was after all, the very reason they seceded in the first place and by humiliating them as Mr. Sumner so desires, will only birth another horrid

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The northern states and the key political leaders at the time, such as Abraham Lincoln, wanted the Union to be preserved. In Lincoln’s inaugural address, he said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.” He also said, “It follows from these views that no State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union; that Resolves and Ordinances to that effect are legally void; and that acts of violence, within any State or States, against the authority of the United States, are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1) What was the relationship between the former Confederate states and the federal Union? What should be demanded of those states before they were regarded as reconstructed?…

    • 3995 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the opening chapter of the book, Silber does a great job out outlining exactly what areas her argument focuses on. She relies somewhat heavily on the concept of complete segregation after the war, and that the North was in a stance of power in terms of forgiveness. She tends to place a great deal of emotion on both the North and the South, in describing the events that formed the reunification process. The North was not worried immediately on “reunion or forgiveness, but the commitment to free labor for all; black and white, northern and southern” (Silber 15). While the idea of reconciliation was a new concept to both areas, Silber argues that the North had control of the “tempo” of forgiveness and they were dedicated to reunifying the nation as a whole, for if it was not restored it would be a complete disappointment to all that has been put into the fight.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People, who think that the South broke away from the Union in the late 1860s because of slavery, should read this book. The reason is, Dew gives a dark and factual view of how much racist fears and slavery propaganda in leading up to the secession of the South’s states by speeches and writings of the secessionist commissioners appointed by South Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi. This opened my mind as to why, how, and what caused the secession?…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ reconstruction

    • 2318 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Perhaps the most challenging task facing our exhausted nation was the future status of the four million newly freed slaves. After the death of President Lincoln and the failure of President Johnson, Congress, in 1867, took charge of the effort to “reconstruct” our divided nation. A large part of “Congressional Reconstruction” was an effort to establish and protect the citizenship rights of the freedmen. The former Confederacy was divided into five military districts, each governed by a Union general. The Southern states, in order to rid themselves of these “military dictatorships,” were required to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, guaranteeing equal rights for all citizens—including former slaves. At the same time, large numbers of former Confederate soldiers and supporters were disfranchised—denied the right to vote. By 1870 all of the former Confederate states had ratified the Fourteenth Amendment and were readmitted to the union. In each state, the voting rights of freedmen were protected while voting was denied to many white Southerners. And so, with many whites not voting, and union troops remaining in the South to protect them, freedmen seemed to be enjoying some level of equal rights and full citizenship.…

    • 2318 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    President Abraham Lincoln did not believe that the south could legally secede from union because the states could not get rid of a government they made without collapsing anarchy. Lincoln called the Union a “contract” (Lincoln 2) between the states and the contract could not be dissolved without the consent of all the states. Since the North did not believe the southern slave states had ample reason to secede, all the states were not in accord, so the “contract” (Lincoln 2) was still valid. If the legal matter was not reason enough against secession, the resulting anarchy from a new government should have been a deterrent. The federal government was not able to please everyone, but no government would be able to please everyone. If the new southern government could form on basis of pleasing everyone, it would dissolve into chaos. The new government would be mob rule and it would encourage other factions to break off from the union if they became dissatisfied. It would plunge both countries into a mad power scramble and it could not be allowed even if it was legal, which it was…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This paper sets out to define or shed some light on the possible reasons of the separation of Confederate states from the Union. The North believed the highest power belonged to the federal government while the South believed that each state governed itself, and the question of slavery should be decided by the states not by the federal government. By examining these two points we may be able to get a clear understanding of popular opinions and mindsets that would cause a nation to war against itself. With the election of Abraham Lincoln on November 6, 1860 South Carolina saw the only recourse was to secede from the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To conclude: even with all the amendments and new laws, America has immensely abortive in obtaining successful political, economic, and social equality. As long as there is the opposition of freedmen, Freedmen’s Bureau, Carpetbaggers, K.K.K. members, and other groups, the nation would continue remaining dysfunctional. To others, learning the extent of the Reconstruction Era unsuccessfully achieving political, economic, and social equality, may help historians and others by teaching them their nation’s…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The North has everything in their favor States, Government, and the Population. The South has one main thing which is the Constitution to offer. So if the North agrees consistently their honor and their safety of the Southern States. The South would restore the harmony and fraternal feelings between the sections” (p.7) But the question still remains will the North agree to this? People say they are dumb if they don’t accept this…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now that the sure wind of war within our country has prevailed we must continue to rebuild upon the accomplishments of the Grant Administration. We must rebuild within our trust with other human beings and rebuild within the large battered roads of this nation. Though much has been done in the last presidency, there is still ton more to accomplish. Likewise the efforts of before have helped me gain a foot on the task to better our united nation. Looking back the last few years, already have we recovered from the tribulation of Civil War. We have started the healing process between the different races that were pitted against each other but now stand as brothers. The recent Civil Rights Acts and the passing of the 15th Amendment have helped to guarantee and ensure the equal Civil Rights that all men will share and all able to be comprised under the glorious Constitution. Yet throughout the years we have also placed ourselves in the continued process of reconstruction in which we have rid the terrors of extremists groups but also have accomplished the first steps of reunion with the Southern states. Likewise, these efforts to heal the previous tension have been done to almost a full recovery. Many former rebels have been pardoned and now the first steps to a unified country have put under way by the removal of many federal soldiers. The vanquishing of the post war tensions has been successful but now we must continue and move…

    • 734 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Reconstruction Dbq

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As Reconstruction began to start in the United States, the question of how the Southern states would be welcomed back into the Union begged at the issue. Reconstruction started to become a struggle between the executive and legislative branches. Radical Republicans, such as Thaddeus Stevens, wanted to approach Reconstruction from a military prospective because they were seeking revenge and felt the South needed to be taught a lesson because of the havoc and damage that they imposed on the Union (Document A). On the other hand, Andrew Johnson wanted to take a more moderate approach to reconstruction in order to quickly reincorporate the Southern states into the Union. To be allowed back into the Union, as per Andrew Johnson’s plan of reconstruction, the Southern states had to, among many other terms, agree to the 13th Constitutional Amendment that recognized the freedom of blacks. Many blacks felt that they knew their previous masters best and argued that although the states would agree to the…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The civil war is considered by many the most important war that our country has endured. During the 5 year Civil War, not only did 620,000 men die, but our nation was left in ruins. It was necessary that our country be rebuilt from bottom up. Abraham Lincoln, said to be the brightest president of his time, had plans and ideas for reconstruction. Unfortunately, these plans were failed to be put in place due to the fact of his assassination on April 14, 1865. Throughout some of the most politically tough years our nation has experienced (1865-1877) lousy presidents were elected, plans and bills failed and succeeded, and struggles with civil rights were prominent everywhere. The United State’s hopeful plans for reconstructing and…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It is often said that hindsight is 20/20 vision, but some major historical events are surrounded by controversy, one of which is the Civil War: was it repressible or irrepressible? It was irrepressible because the north and south were too culturally different for a compromise to work. The south believed slavery was an essential part of their economy and often advocated for strong state’s rights. The north was steadily industrializing with the increasing textile mills and growing urban population as well as beginning to see the horrors of slavery. The limits of the fragilely strung together Union were tested in the expansion westward and eventually some southern states began to secede. Compromises such as the Compromise of 1850 and the Kansas Nebraska Act only held off the conflict, and many believe the final straw that broke the back of the Union was Lincoln’s election and the dealings of Fort Sumter.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet Analytical Essay

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare is a tragic story about a prince named Hamlet attempting to get revenge for his father's murder. As Hamlet only to slowly destroy his life in the process. As Hamlet attempts to get revenge, he ultimately ends up destroying himself and the people around him. But before his death, Hamlet slowly decides what he wants to do with his life. Hamlet goes from thinking the world holds nothing for him but not wanting to kill himself because he fears god in the first Soliloquy, to living to avenge his father if needed in the second Soliloquy, to fearing death in the third Soliloquy. Hamlet slowly decides what he wants to do with his life, through his first three Soliloquies in the play…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Charity towards all, and malice towards none”, were Lincoln’s words and his vision of the path of Reconstruction. After the bloody defeat of the rebellious Southern states in the Civil War, America needed peaceful reconciliation and reconstruction. What was intended to be a painless, effortless plan turned into another irrelevant conflict that ended up a failure. Although, the southern reaction to northern rule was a factor that lead its to failure, northern political factors also killed Reconstruction.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays