Preview

The Role of Marxist Views in Understanding Society

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
581 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role of Marxist Views in Understanding Society
The Marxist view of the world is that society is based upon class conflict; created by Karl Marx this ideology argues that society is split into 2 separate classes the upper class known as the Bourgeoisie and the lower/working class called the Proletariat. In a capitalist society the Bourgeoisie own the means of productions therefore exploiting the lower classes by forcing them to work manual jobs with little pay. However the Proletariat is lured in a false class consciousness; meaning that they are unaware they are being exploited by the Bourgeoisie. Marx believed that the one way which would resolve this issue would be a global revolution turning the capitalist societies into communist utopias where everyone was equal.
Marxist ideas have however been criticised, Marx’s two-class model of inequality is outdated. A new middle class has emerged, consisting of managerial and professional workers, which falls between the bourgeoisie upper class and the proletariat lower class; Marx’s theory cannot account for all the differences within the mass of the population who are not capitalists, such as between manual and non-manual workers. However Giddens argues that the two-class model should be viewed more as a theoretical construct around which to build an analysis of society. Marx believed that the Proletariat classes within society would realise that they are being exploited by the ruling class and rise up in revolution removing the class conflict and imposing a communist society where each person was equal. However, many sociologists argue that this idea created by Marx cannot be applied to today’s society due to the fact that a revolution has not occurred. Although there have been several revolutions in the past within some societies, such as in Russia, they have not occurred in all societies nor have they remained permanent. Also, Marx’s idea of communism being better than capitalism has been questioned by many sociologists, especially within today’s society;
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Outline and Assess Marxist views on Social Inequality
    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Outline and Assess Marxist views on Social Inequality

    One view Marxist sociologists have on social inequality is that we live in a society controlled by the Tri-level structure where the Bourgeoisie oppress the Proletariat by controlling the means of production and the manual labour they contribute to the capitalist society. Marxists seek to explain the economic inequalities and the relationship of the individual to the economic structure of society; however the lower the level of success, the more economic inequality will occur as the Proletariat is continuously oppressed by the Bourgeoisie as the source of their control is economics. Marxists believe that society is further polarizing the ‘rich’ and the ‘poor’ with the ‘uppers’ gaining and the ‘downers’ left to suffer (Mount, 2004), and this will eventually lead to the diminishing of what is known as the middle class who will fall into the catergory of the Proletariat as their jobs become deskilled (Braverman, 1974). This is critiqued by Functionalists Davis and Moore (1945) as they argue that pay is related to talent and that the most important jobs are secured by the most able individuals who are paid appropriately high wages. These ideas in turn lead to the concept of meritocracy, a functionalist theory which suggests that we live in a society where access to social rewards is determined by talent and achievement rather than an individual’s social background. Therefore, Marxist oppose the idea that the less privileged in society are able to break free from their economic position in regards to ‘talent’ and that the tri-level structure within society is a prominent fixture that controls the way our society is viewed and understood.…

    • 1425 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's View On Human Nature Analysis
    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Machiavelli's View On Human Nature Analysis

    Marx and Engels wrote the Communist Manifesto to explain the history of class struggles in Europe and how communism was the ultimate form of government meant to bring equality to society and end the oppressive rule of the rising Bourgeoisie class. For Marx, humans are rational beings. But in a bourgeoisie capitalist dominated society, reality has become distorted and diminished a once functioning society. Industrialization has created a society of working class citizens who are manipulated, easily exploited, and oppressed for monetary gains. This is counterintuitive for the advancement of society and a successful government and brings about struggles of class. Therefore Marx argues the working class should be in control of government, because they are the ones ho keep the bourgeoisie rich and the economy running. “Formation of the proletariat into a class, overthrow of the bourgeois supremacy, conquest of political power by the proletariat” (Marx 14). Marx argues the average working class citizens are capable of governing the land and distributing wealth evenly amongst the people. Writing is simply not enough he calls for revolution in order to restore peace and end the impoverishment of many…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Week 1 Sociology Notes
    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Week 1 Sociology Notes

    Karl Marx’s class conflict theory states that the bourgeoisie (or the capitalists) are locked in conflict with the proletariat (the exploited workers). Marx believed that this conflict could only end when the working class united and violently broke free of the “bondage”. Once this happens, society will be classless and people will work according to their abilities, while receiving goods and services according to their needs. Although Marxism does propose revolution, it should not be confused with communism.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Influentia In Brave New World Marxism Essay
    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Influentia In Brave New World Marxism Essay

    According to Karl Marx, the struggle between the upper class, the bourgeoisie and the lower class, the proletariat, has always been a constant conflict throughout history. The bourgeoisie controlled all means of production and continuously oppressed the proletariat, which was unfair because the proletariats were the ones doing hard labor, yet the bourgeoisie gained all of the benefits. Marx believed that in order to end this class struggle, class distinctions would need to be eliminated. In order for everybody in society to be considered equal, there could be no private ownership of materials. If private ownership of materials were allowed, then some people would have more things than other people which would create another class and thus another conflict. Therefore, an equalized society would get rid of all conflict. Marxism has been…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Education System: Does It Support and Maintain a Capitalist Society?
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Education System: Does It Support and Maintain a Capitalist Society?

    Marxism is a conflict view that sees society as being based on class divisions and exploitation. Marxists argue that in society there are two classes – the bourgeoisie which is the ruling class and the proletariat which is the working class. The capitalist class owns the means of production and make their profit by exploiting the labour of the working class. This creates class conflict that could threaten the stability of capitalism or even result in a revolution to overthrow it. Social institutions such as the education system reproduce class inequalities and play an ideological role by persuading exploited workers that inequality is justified and acceptable.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    unit 7 p1
    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages

    unit 7 p1

    Marxism was introduced and studied by Karl Marx during 1818 and 1883. The Marxist view is based on the conflicts and interests of the society, it also strongly highlights on the importance of conflict in societies and communities. They also believe that economics are the bases of progressing and social life this can be achieved by struggling through social classes. The two classes that Marx discussed about were the Bourgeoisie and Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie class is a small powerful group who may have owned factories or own companies whereas the Proletariat is a poorer group of workers. The way a Marxists thinks is based on the financial structures and systems as well as social class meaning that these factors are vital in the Marxist view.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain The Principal Sociological Principles
    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain The Principal Sociological Principles

    In sociology, Marxism explains social change and movements. Developed by Karl Marx in the mid-1800s, Marxism holds that in a capitalist society the owners of the means of production oppress those who work in them. For example, the people who own large corporations exploit corporate employees, who perform unrewarding work for little pay. Resulting class conflict leads to social change in the form of revolution, as the workers overthrow the ruling class. In general, social change arises from class conflict. Marx thought classes would disappear in a communist…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie Compare and Contrast
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie Compare and Contrast

    Marx believed class struggles had existed throughout history and concluded that because of industrialization, society had dwindled down to two classes: the proletariat (laborers) and the bourgeoisie (owners of the means of production). He viewed class struggles and industry as harmful to humanity because they allowed the bourgeoisie to exploit the proletariat.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    Marx posited that the two classes in a society – the bourgeoisie and the proletariat – will remain stuck in their respective classes because of the very nature of capitalism. The wealthy capital-owning bourgeoisie not only owns the factories but dominate the media, universities, government, bureaucracy, and, therefore their grip on an elevated social status is unchangeable. In contrast, the poor, working class, or the…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why the Marxist Ideal Cannot Work
    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Why the Marxist Ideal Cannot Work

    The Marxist ideal, a highly appealing, almost Utopian society, is impossible to achieve due to the fact that it demands that the human mind be almost without flaws. It asks of society and its members to be absolutely without ranks, without greed or leadership. This has been clearly impossible for society. Each step to achieving a communist establishment has been, continues to be, and will be, in actuality, a step towards the totalitarian societies of past and current so-called communist countries. Communism became popular solely in under-developed countries, contrary to Marx's beliefs as to what should happen, and its rise in these countries was the beginning of its fall.…

    • 1720 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and European Society
    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Karl Marx and European Society

    Socialist views appeared in Europe wide-spread during the late eighteenth and century and early nineteenth century. Karl Marx, though among others, held the most respected and published views of socialism as described in his eloquently worded book, The Communist Manifesto. In this literary work, Karl Marx describes the upper class bourgeoisie as members of society who feed off the hard earned money and exuberating labor of the lower classes, proletariats. In Marxian Socialism, the proletariat instigates a violent uprising against the bourgeoisie and ultimately overthrows the oppressive upper class and initiates a dictatorship government by the proletariat for the proletariat. While most of these views were deemed highly radical and not widely accepted, Karl Marx did speculate about the future of European society and the positioning of socioeconomic classes. In his opinion, Karl Marx believed that European society would be brutally divided into two classes, the bourgeoisie and proletariat. However, as a result of a few social and economic influences, Karl Marx was incorrect in his conjecture that the people of nineteenth century Europe would be diversely split into two opposing social classes.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Communist Manifesto
    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Communist Manifesto

    The Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx in 1848 is noted as one of the most influential political documents in the world. The publication of the book earned Marx the reputation of a prominent sociologist and political theorist. Despite his renown, there are many controversies concerning the ideas and concepts of communism formulated in the papers that are still heatedly debated even today. Marx opened the book with, “The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.” (p.4). He scrutinized the class differences and social inequality between the Proletariats and Bourgeoisies, two terms he coined to represent social classes that do not own the means of production and social classes that do own the means of production respectively. Since The Communist Manifesto was produced in an era of great social distress, it was the result of Marx’s desire to eliminate the gap between the two classes in order to ameliorate the social, political, and economic conditions of the Proletarians. To achieve equality, Marx encouraged the Proletarians to conspire against the Bourgeoisies to end the exploitation of lower social classes and set up a communistic society where class distinction is a leap of imagination. However, his ideal required changes that a society cannot successfully adapt to and do not ultimately provide equality. Marx’s theories were established upon only class stratification and ignored the many other factors that contribute to the foundation of a society. The entire list of demands that outlines the rules and regulations of communism do not fundamentally offer fairness. Communism disrupts the whole social exchange system which will eventually corrupt the economy of a society. Thus, the theories introduced in The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx are not relevant in modern industrialized societies primarily because they focus only on the issue of class…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marxism Vs Capitalism In America
    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marxism Vs Capitalism In America

    During the Industrial Revolution around the 18th and early 19th centuries, Karl Marx (the founder of communism) analyzed the conflict which he strongly believed exists between the Bourgeoisie (Upper-Middle Class) and Proletariat (Lower Class). Marx was against capitalistic views because in his perspective, such a system of society only meant that the privileged groups would exploit the sub-ordinate groups and this would result in a massive class-inequality. Moreover, that the rich would keep getting richer and the poor would remain getting poorer. In society, mankind will have lost its appreciation for equality and human welfare. Taxation or any other methods will be of no use because it does not guarantee a Lower-Class citizen a better position in employment, education, or wealth. But, merely provides them enough wages so that they may hold themselves in place. Marx believed that in order to eliminate class-struggle and inequality would mean to eliminate capitalism as a whole and resort to the ways of socialism which would eventually, lead to…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Marxist Perspective
    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxist Perspective

    In “Offloading For Mrs. Schwartz” by George Saunders, the narrator lives in a society guarded by the commodification of human experiences in the pursuit of money. Situated across the mall from O My God, a vintage religious statuary store, the narrator owns a business selling holographic modules. Despite the economic consciousness displayed by the narrator’s community, the narrator chooses to reject his societal standard of wealth by being economically content with his life. The narrator rejects societal capitalistic structure by accepting the plight of his failing business and leaving his house with a balcony to live in Rockettown, the ghetto, to care for Mrs. Ken Schwartz, an elderly woman. Unlike his society, the narrator loses himself in his charity work for Mrs. Schwartz and ultimately sacrifices his existence in order to provide for Mrs. Schwartz. Paradoxically, the commodification of his existence to provide for Mrs. Schwartz actually liberates him from his materialistic society.…

    • 901 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Marxist Approach to Media
    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Marxist Approach to Media

    Marxist approach explains that society consists of two classes, two main layers, namely, the higher class and the lower class. The higher class, or also called bourgeoisie, are the people with power, the people who own enterprises, i.e. banks, factories, etc., people who have wealth, people who employ, people who are worked for. On the contrary, the lower class, the proletariat, are those who have to work for the owners of the enterprises, those who are employed. According to Marx, the ruling class oppresses the working class and he calls this conflict 'the motor of history' (The Media Student's Book, Branston and Stafford, p.174). The capitalists have the wealth and power but they need the…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More