Preview

The Role of Enobarbus in Acts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
899 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role of Enobarbus in Acts
In Shakespeare's tragedy/history/Roman play Antony and Cleopatra, we are told the story of two passionate and power-hungry lovers. In the first two Acts of the play we are introduced to some of the problems and dilemmas facing the couple (such as the fact that they are entwined in an adulterous relationship, and that both of them are forced to show their devotion to Caesar). Along with being introduced to Antony and Cleopatra's strange love affair, we are introduced to some interesting secondary characters.

One of these characters is Enobarbus. Enobarbus is a high-ranking soldier in Antony's army who it seems is very close to his commander. We know this by the way Enobarbus is permitted to speak freely (at least in private) with Antony, and often is used as a person to whom Antony confides in. We see Antony confiding in Enobarbus in Act I, Scene ii, as Antony explains how Cleopatra is "cunning past man's thought" (I.ii.146). In reply to this Enobarbus speaks very freely of his view of Cleopatra, even if what he says is very positive:

...her passions are made of nothing but the finest part of pure love. We cannot call her winds and waters sighs and tears; they are greater storms and tempests than almanacs can report.
This cannot be cunning in her; if it be she makes a shower of rain as well as Jove.
(I, ii, 147-152)
After Antony reveals that he has just heard news of his wife's death, we are once again offered an example of Enobarbus' freedom to speak his mind, in that he tells Antony to "give the gods a thankful sacrifice" (I.ii.162), essentially saying that Fulvia's death is a good thing. Obviously, someone would never say something like this unless they were in very close company.

While acting as a friend and promoter of Antony, Enobarbus lets the audience in on some of the myth and legend surrounding Cleopatra. Probably his biggest role in the play is to exaggerate Anthony and Cleopatra's relationship. Which he does so well in the following

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many ways the character of Enobarbus is the most accurate and reliable source for the audience to reveal the most about Antony’s tragic decline, and so therefore he is the most credible. This is perhaps most prominent when Enobarbus is talking with Agrippa and Maecenas in Act 2 Scene 3 and when Maecenas’ character tells him that “Now Antony must leave [Octavia] utterly”, the reply is “Never! He will not.” This shows the audience that Enobarbus’ character knows the most about Antony, as he is the only character who knows that Antony will never leave Cleopatra, and so he is the only character that is able to show the audience the scale of the tragic decline that Antony will experience. The fact that the phrase has masculine stresses on the “Never!” and “not” would have shown a Jacobean audience how assertive Enobarbus’ character was on this point and how sure he is that Antony will leave Octavia for Cleopatra, which fore-shadows Antony’s tragic decline as a Jacobean audience would have known the story of Antony and Cleopatra, and so hearing his character say this would have made him a very credible source that reveals the most about Antony’s tragic decline. Also, as the stresses are masculine, it would have portrayed Enobarbus’ character as a very strong and assertive male figure at this point in the play, which would have meant that a Jacobean audience would have seen the information he gives to them more reliable as the men were the dominant figures who were always correct, again making him more credible to reveal the most information about Antony’s tragic decline.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout his speech, Antony used a lot of sarcasm. He told the citizens repeatedly that Brutus was an honorable man. “But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable man” (3.2.86-87). While Antony seemed as though he was supportive of the conspirators and only mourning over Caesar’s body, he was…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Love: The theme of love is prevalent in every Shakespeare comedy. Often, we are presented with sets of lovers who, through the course of the play, overcome the obstacles in their relationship and unite. Love in Shakespearean comedy is stronger than the inertia of custom, the power of evil, or the fortunes of chance and time. In all of these plays but one (Troilus and Cressida), the obstacles presented to love are triumphantly overcome, as conflicts are resolved and errors forgiven in a general aura of reconciliation and marital bliss at the play's close. Such intransigent characters as Shylock, Malvolio, and Don John, who choose not to act out of love, cannot be accommodated in this scheme, and they are carefully isolated from the action before the climax.…

    • 1760 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act 5 begins with Octavius and Antony saying that their hopes have come true because the men are fleeing the hills and coming to them. This says that Brutus is not truly in his right mind for strategy and is blinded by wanting be honorable after killing Caesar. Cassius then tells Brutus “Flatterers! Now, Brutus, thank yourself;/This tongue had not offended so today/If Cassius might have ruled.” (see lines 45-47), meaning that if had acted as Cassius suggested, then they would not be headed towards battle and may have lived. Also, Cassius reveals that he has seen ravens, crows, and kites flying over them, like vultures waiting for meat after the prey has been killed. After Cassius confession, Brutus says that should they lose the battle, he…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Essay

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the initial scenes of his play, Shakespeare clearly outlines the distinct conflict of perspectives held by his main protagonists; Antony and Cassius regarding Caesar. Shakespeare’s representation of Antony incorporates that of a humble, loyal and devoted disciple of Caesar; embodied in his vow “When Caesar says, ‘Do this’, it is performed.” Antony’s obedient tone, linked with the concise manner in which he replies to Caesar, captures the utter willingness to serve “Caesar, (his) lord.” In contrast, Shakespeare exhibits Cassius’ bitterness and envy of Caesar as he influences Brutus’ inner confusion to the viewpoint he considers correct. Cassius provides an analogy further encouraging the traitorous desires; “he doth bestride the narrow world like a colossus, and we petty men walk under his huge legs.” Here Cassius employs a sarcastic tone to aggressively attack Caesar’s authority as a leader, “such a feeble temper should so get the start of…

    • 1011 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    3,101-102). In this line he is asking the audience why should they applaud Brutus for killing Caesar. They had loved and admired Caesar at some point so why should they not mourn him now.…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From lines 9-18, Antony uses the idea of Brutus being an honorable man to great irony, as his inflection proves that he thinks otherwise.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Antony's plan

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mark Antony plays a huge role for advocating for Caesar after he was murdered by Brutus and the conspires. He is the on…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By comparing the use of Ethos, pathos, and logos in the speeches by both Brutus and Antony in the play , it is clear that Antony’s speech is more persuasive. Both plays have their own unique ways of using Ethos, pathos and logos in their plays but Antony seemed to have the more persuasive speech, even though Brutus was said to be the one who is better at speeches because he does them more often than Antony.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    W. M. Murray, (1997), The Evolution of a Public Image: Actium and Augustus, in JRA 10…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Antony's performance in front of the crowd should come as no surprise. We can tell from his Act III, sc. I meeting with the conspirators that he means something different in nearly everything he says. We know…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marc Antony had ethos to speak about Caesar because he was Caesar’s most noble follower and he knew Caesar as a close friend. He has served with him in the military and had a lot of respect for Caesar. He knew Caesar was a man, and like all men had made mistakes, but at the same time wanted people to remember the good things Caesar had done for Rome. “The evil that men do lives after…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Play

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In play, Julius Caesar, it has strength that makes the play a famous play. In the play, we could understand characters emotion and behaviors clearly since it is in their own words instead of a narration. From the text from Cassius’s dialogue,” For my part, I have walked about the streets, submitting me unto the perilous night.” we could emphasizes how Cassius is showing off to Casca the braveness he has. Another point would be the speeches that are introduce in the play. Another example would be in Act 1, scene 2 where Antony comments, “When Caesar says, do this, it is performed. Sometimes not only the characters dialogue could be recognize as his or her personality and characteristics. In this text by Antony, we could feel the powerful leadership from Caesar. Speeches help a better understanding of each character thought towards different people. Such as the speech that Antony gave where it begins with “Friends, Romans, Countrymen, lend me your ears…..” In this speech Antony keep repeating “Brutus is an honorable man”, this shows sarcasms that Antony is speaking out. While reading this speech, you will find confusions where Antony is criticizing Brutus action but on the other hand he keeps stating that Brutus is an honorable man that opposites other facts. This kind of passage grabs the reader attention to think profoundly. The weakness would be the organization of the plot. I believe the play is moving in a speed what I believe is fast. Fast play makes it difficult to recognize clearly with each scenes and acts. For example from the meeting of conspirators to the death of Julius Caesar flows quite rapid. Between those two scenes, I feel a bit empty cause no way that these conspirators did not planned in a way that they could successfully without any obstacles kill Julius Caesar. The play might improve if the process of planning would be added between those two periods. We might absorb characters; personality and perspective towards this event during their…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare does not reveal much about Antony until after the death of Caesar, but he is found to be loyal to those he loves and ruthless to those he hates.…

    • 1471 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Of all Shakespeare’s works , Julius Caesar is a play that hinges upon rhetoric - both as the art of persuasion and an artifice used to veil intent. The most striking of Shakespeare is his command of language. In Mark Antony’s funeral oration for Caesar, we have not only one of Shakespeare’s most recognizable opening lines but one of his finest examples of rhetorical irony at work. The speech could serve as a thematic synopsis to Julius Caesar. One of the most important and significant parts in the play is the funeral speech given by both Brutus and Mark Antony. At first, the funeral speeches seem to have no true significant meaning. However in further investigation it is established that the speeches ultimately serve as the basis for the final outcome of the play. By exploring the speeches of both Brutus and Mark Antony we are able to focus on the important details which alter one from the other. Through this analysis we are also able to realize why Brutus's speech becomes one of his justifications and explanations, while Antony's becomes one of manipulation and skill. It is known that both Brutus and Antony desired to appeal to the common people. However, the way in which each man went about it differs drastically. Not only did it influence the outcome of the play, but each speech also offers a unique insight on each of the speakers.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays