Preview

The Rights Of Freedmen During Reconstruction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
590 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Rights Of Freedmen During Reconstruction
Many people don’t realize that after the Civil War, another war was fought during Reconstruction, a “Cold War” regarding the rights of the freedmen. Following the Civil War, the slaves were set free in a conflicted world where people couldn’t decide on their fate; they were caught in the crossfire between Congress and the civilians on the amount of rights they could have. The Congress, wishing to grant the freed slaves rights, failed to ensure the rights to the freedmen because of many reasons.
At first, the future looked bright. The 14th and 15th Amendments stated: “All persons born or naturalized in the US are citizens of the US.. no state shall deprive any person of life liberty or happiness… the right of citizens of the US to vote shall not be denied.” (Document A) The slaves were granted citizenship and the right to
…show more content…
However, soon the Black codes were instigated, and they soon began to limit the rights of the slaves. One version in a town called Opelousas stated: “No negro shall be allowed to come within the limits of the town.” (Document B) This severely limited the rights of the freedmen and actively ostracized them from society. Despite this, “thousands of Africans were elected to local governments and state governments throughout the Southern States” (Document D) since many Southern officials were not allowed to vote. However, when the Southerners were granted the right to vote again, they made it their goal to oppress the Blacks in every way possible.
Several different methods of oppression were used to keep the Blacks on the bottom. When “Southern Democrats gained strength when Congress finally removed the political disabilities from most of the prewar leadership.”(Document 3), they saw

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the years leading up to the Civil War, the constitution did not provide a clear answer for deciding whether or not a slave had the same rights as a person. The federal government faced a divided country, and passed laws enforcing the return of slaves to their owner’s states, such as the Fugitive Slave Act. Contradicting this were “personal liberty laws,” which allowed states to decide who would be considered a person in their territory. However, both the Fugitive Slave Act and “personal liberty laws” were challenged in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. The ambiguity of the constitution would lead to a four-year-long war between the Northern and Southern states.…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil War, the southern soldiers were going back to devastated cities, destroyed railroads, and many cities were burned to the ground as a result of Sherman’s march from sea to sea. After the Civil War occurred, the slaves were given freedom from their owners, and slavery was banned. That attempt at reconstruction was not a complete fail, but it took a little bit of time for America to give social and economic equality to slaves. There were many attempts made by several different presidents, but not all seemed to work due to the South’s stubbornness. The failure of reconstruction later did not bring social and economic equality to former slaves in the south because of things like the Jim Crow laws and the South’s strong disproval of the outcome of the war.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Share cropping initially arose as a compromise between blacks’ desire for land and planter’s for labor discipline.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: The New Divide

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The slave owners tried everything they could to keep their slaves. They tried peonage, discriminatory laws, and gave them no education to succeed in life. The former slaves should’ve been given their freedom and justice when the war was over. Some basic justices they should’ve gotten include a chance at education and a type of compensation. This discrimination in the south lasted for about fifty more years until Martin Luther King Jr. saw the differences between whites and blacks. The justice for freed slaves took a long time to obtain and we should be aware of the difficulties the former slaves went…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assignment 1 AMH2020

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages

    During reconstruction, the meaning of freedom suited many different types of interpretation; the perception of freedom between former slaves and their slaves masters were very contradictory. To begin with, African-Americans had suffered severe abuse over those years of slavery, so to them, the meaning of freedom was basically a hope that in the future, they won’t experience all kind of punishment and exploration that they have been experienced so far. Besides that, formers slaves were demanding equal civil and political rights. In the same way, they valued their freedom by establishing their own schools and churches, reuniting families that were separated under slavery and seeking financial dependence. Foner (2014) supports the same argument: “Blacks relished the opportunity to demonstrate their liberation from the regulation, significant and trivial, associated with slavery. They openly held mass meeting and religious services free of white supervision” (p. 557) . In addition, Foner (1014) also found “Former slaves’ ideas of freedom, like those of rural people throughout the world, were directly related to landownership” (p. 560) . On other hand, their slaves masters’ perception of freedom was different. For example, most Southerners reacted the emancipation with dismay, according to Foner (2014) , Southern leaders didn’t want to accept reality “Freedom still meant hierarchy and mastery; it was a privilege not a right, a carefully defined legal status rather than an open-ended entitlement” (p. 561) .…

    • 654 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Afras 170b

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Q. How did democrats limit African American political power in the South, even if African Americans were voting?…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Post-civil war, the United States was divided into two: South and North. In the North, Radical Republicans ruled and Democrats led the South. Having very different opinions on what to do to unify the country again, there was the creation of many ideas, laws, amendments, and acts that led to what we call the Reconstruction period. The legacy of Reconstruction is good, as goals to reunify South and North were achieved. It is also very negative because racial inequalities continued in many different ways as black codes and Jim Crow laws kept blacks from being equal. Starting with the Radical Reconstruction, the South was attacked by laws that were intended to make them become states free of black oppression. Radical Republicans wrote the Civil War amendments that made every man free and equal, made them citizens and gave blacks the right to vote.…

    • 1457 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “A house divided against itself cannot stand.-Abraham Lincoln” Before the Civil War Whites had freedom but African Americans were slaves. This was not fair to African Americans because they were being treated differently than Whites. Some people felt that everyone should be treated equally and become one. That is why the Civil War started. Both “Narrative Life of Frederick Douglass” and “A House Divided” are good examples of how freedom and slavery affected these people. The Civil War terminated slavery and redefined what it means to be a free American.…

    • 90 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Southern state legislatures had passed and maintained a series of discriminatory requirements and practices that had disenfranchised most of the millions of African Americans across…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the history of the world, there have been many failures. Examples of failures in history would be the Articles of Confederation, post-Civil War Reconstruction, and the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I. However, with each different failure in history, there are different reasons for why these failures occurred. Following the Civil War, there are many different reasons why Congress' Reconstruction efforts to ensure equal rights to the freedmen failed. The main reason why Reconstruction failed was because of the discriminatory feelings toward the African Americans. Two examples that support this reason are the corruption within the government and the different actions taken by various rebellion groups. Between the years of 1865 and 1877, Congress' efforts to end slavery and to ensure that equal rights were provided for everyone showed that it ultimately failed. One reason why Reconstruction after the Civil War failed was because there was corruption within the government. Boyer, a Pennsylvanian Congressman who despised blacks, said that he believes that the reason why black people should be denied the right to vote is because African Americans are not equal to white Americans and that they do not have the mental capacity to vote. This statement by Boyer suggests that racism towards African Americans was abundant in both the South and the North (Doc 1). Because of this feeling of resentment towards African Americans, especially in the…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Essay Civil War

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Civil War was not officially fought over the issue of slavery, but one of the most important outcomes of the war was the emancipation of all slaves in the United States. The reasons for southern states’ secession ranged from unfair duties imposed on the states to the recurring issue of slavery (Document A). This secession unofficially started the war and created great tension between the North and the South. President Lincoln’s main purpose of commencing war was to unite the divided nation, and with tactics such as his Emancipation Proclamation and gaining the Border States’ support he was able to achieve his goal of reunification. Other results yielded by the war were the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution. These provisions formally ended slavery and guaranteed the black freedmen future citizenship and suffrage. The blacks argued that if they fought in the war to preserve the Union that they were entitled to voting and having the same rights as other American citizens (Document C). The Civil Rights Act of 1866 declared that every person born in the United States, without regard to race, color, or previous conditions of slavery or involuntary service, is entitled to citizenship.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Now Republicans constitute most of the South’s congressional delegations. The emergence of Southern Republicanism helped bring back the competitive aspect of presidential elections coupled with the revitalization of the South, its’ senators and representatives. The old regime of Southern politics in the South is viewed as “transparently undemocratic and thoroughly racist” (muse.jhu.edu). The Southern political structure was designed to block out the Negro population and threatened influences from the outside. By protecting white supremacy and the segregation amongst races pertaining to party affiliation, southern democrats condoned racial injustice for generations to…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Black Codes. Although the Thirteenth Amendment outlawed slavery, the whole “freed blacks” was very much unresolved in the South. Now the white power structure in the South wanted to keep their way of life as close to what it was as possible, so under the mild Reconstruction policies of President Johnson they where able to reestablish order to the Confederate states with these codes. The Black Codes were designed to limit newly freed blacks’ activity so that they were available for work. For example a lot of states made sure that…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 15th amendment stated than any male citizen, regardless of color, or past servitude, could vote, and that the states could not deny them this. Having the right to vote was a huge victory for Blacks. White Americans, especially those in politics, could no longer ignore them, since their vote could decide who became Governor, Senator or even President. This gave Black people a lot of power bot socially, and politically. The fact that people who were once enslaved could vote, also helped developed an argument for women to gain suffrage, which occurred 50 years later. The 15th amendment was a major step toward equality, and was a huge win for the United States, even if people during the 1870’s could not see that at the…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freedom In Louisiana

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before being freed, slaves were not allowed whatsoever to be involved in politics. Being able to be apart of the country in which they live in, African-Americans were content. Many joined government bodies. The new Louisiana constitution that was rewritten under the Reconstruction Acts of 1867 salutes many of the blacks, most of them freeborn, who formed a majority of delegates at the Louisiana Constitutional Convention of 1868. The many others who were did not physically a part of government exercised their rights to vote with the rest of the eligible voters, not as African-Americans and whites, but all together as citizens of the United States of America. Though many did go into government, some continued to work. They were…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays