The Right to Die: Is It Right?

Better Essays
The phrase “The right to die” means the ethical or institutional entitlement of the individual to commit suicide or to undergo voluntary euthanasia.( Right to die, - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 6 April 2012) It is one of the topics that has been debated over centuries. It starts from the 1950s, which arise from a small group of thinkers and writers in the United States and Europe, they began to argue about the choice that allows the patients to end their life by themselves in the case of surviving with those life support, in the case of the terminally ill, and many more. The acceptance of these arguments expand in the 1960s as the civil rights movement, the sexual revolution and other social movements helped to expand notions of personal freedom. While In the 1970s, this “right to die “has became an issue in the national stage due to the highly publicized 1975 case of Karen Ann Quinlan, who is a 21 year old woman that had fallen into a coma and she is unable to survive without the help of an artificial respirator. In this case Quinlan's family wants to remove her life support but it is thwarted by her doctor, leading to a lawsuit and a ruling by the Supreme Court that patients and by extension their families, they have a right to remove her life support. (Wired 2012) As “the right to die” has became an issue in the world, books begins to publish arguing about this topic, such as Managing Death by James M. Hoefler , Euthanasia and Law in Europe by John Griffiths, Heleens Weyers and Maurice Adams and many more.( James Leonard Park 2012) Law permitting doctors to end the life of certain terminally ill patients is created too, under the strict rules and procedures in several countries ,such as Netherlands , Belgium, Europe , Australia , United States , New Zealand and many more. Although it is approve and legalize by many countries but in my opinion, the right to die should not be considered a right because of several reasons.
I think that the right to die

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Opposition to the right to die movement is mostly led by people who believe that euthanasia is ruining the sanctity of life. The sanctity of life often refers to the idea that human life is sacred and should not be tampered with regardless of the person. However, recently the quality of life is being preferred over sanctity, and for good reason. The quality of life refers to the fact that life should be lived to the fullest it can. Medically speaking, the quality of life is a patient's general well-being. If a patient has an extremely low quality of life and understands what they are doing, they should be able to choose if they would like to medically end their own life. People also believe that it should not be someone's choice when they…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right to End Ones Life

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is described as the intentionally killing by act or omission of a dependent human being for his or her alleged benefit. Euthanasia is frowned upon by society because it is deemed unethical to intentionally take one’s own life regardless of what life has to throw at them. In today’s society, individuals have now started realizing that deciding to take one’s own life is a personal choice they can make and should not be restricted by moral or social laws from doing so. Depending on which theory (Kantianism/Utilitarianism), one can come to a conclusion if they support euthanasia or not. If one has the right to preserve their life, they certainly have to right take away their life. Euthanasia is a personal choice that’s should be freely made as long as the decision is made when the individual is in the right state of mind.…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia is defined as the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment. Euthanasia, today, has become a very controversial topic. The issue and question at hand is whether or not to allow euthanasia. We are questioned to let the ill have a prolonged life mechanically but miserably, assisting suicide, or natural death. Many people see death as an inevitable part of life while others fear it and want to strive to live on. However, the issues that are around euthanasia are not only about death, they are about ones right to privacy and control over their own body; in other words the fourteenth amendment.…

    • 612 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death is a natural event that every living thing must go through as part of the life cycle. Death has many causes, such as accidents, disease, and old age. Disease is probably the most painful and stressful forms of death, mainly because of the manmade cures and treatments a person goes through to attempt to fight the sickness. As the disease progresses, the pain is progressing as well. Some pain is worse than others, but those with extreme cases may not wish to die an agonizing death. A peaceful death is something that every living creature is entitled to. For example, if someone’s dog is sick and in pain and will not live a comfortable life because of their sickness, the dog is euthanized. It is an interesting fact that an animal can be euthanized, but a conscious, rational human being cannot have the same treatment if they are incapable of ending their own life. Abortion is the termination of an unborn child, who has no choice in the matter, but that is also legal. It is odd that an animal or unborn child that cannot make the choice to end their life can be killed legally, but a person who decides to ask for assistance in ending their own life cannot do so because it is illegal and defies the morals of the majority. However, just the desire to die should not be sufficient to receive a physician’s assisted suicide. A person should be in physical, not mental, pain. Mental pain can be lessened with medications and…

    • 1848 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Being able to choose when to die is a human right. This exact point is presented in the article “Perhaps I’ll say goodbye on Twitter”. According to Tony Nicklson, who is a 58 year old, patient who has been able to move only his eyelids since suffering a stroke in 2005, it is the most fundamental human right. He told the journalist and former nurse Nina Lakhani, that: “he was simply seeking the same right to die that able-bodied people were able to exercise independently”. However, if he is provided this right, it would be a change of law as Alison Pearson claims, in the article “Do any of us, however ill, have the right to die?” She believes in the exact opposite. She is oppose assisted suicide, and her article is kind of a response to the argumentations of Tony Nicklinson. She starts out her article by explaining how only a complete idiot would put cancer on their top of their wishlist: “Other than that you would have to be seriously warped, mad even, to choose a brutal, life-threatening illness. Yet Tony Nicklinson says he wants to get cancer. Cancer is Tony’s best hope”. If Tony cannot be offered the opportunity to commit assisted suicide, he would rather die by the hand of cancer, because Tony Nicklinson’s only desire is to leave this world of suffering. Alison Pearson is contradicting Tony Nicklinson by saying that it is wrong to give doctors the right to kill patients, and on the other hand, she devises other alternatives to die. For example she brings up the fact, that you could just refuse medical treatment, as it is legal, and she further explains that: “I certainly plan to have one of those handy when I’m old and at the mercy of our marvellous “care” system”, explaining that she might use this method herself without having to change the law.…

    • 953 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthanasia, or physician-assisted suicide, is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain or suffering. People may immediately be turned off by this idea when first presented with it, but in certain situations, euthanasia should be used to prevent further suffering for people diagnosed as terminally ill, which is a medical term to describe a disease that cannot be cured or adequately treated and that is reasonably expected to result in death of the patient within a short time.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    basically concept of right to die based on the philosophy of humanism who recognize freedom of individual for choice to live or die with dignity, Which are given to every citizen. “To die proudly when it is no longer possible to live proudly. Death freely chosen, death at the right time, brightly and cheerfully accomplished amid children and witnesses : then a real farewell is still possible, as the one who is taking leave is still there; also a real estimate of what one has wished, drawing the sum of one’slife – all in opposition to the wretched and revolting comedy that Christianity has made of the hour of death.” . Here right to die may be used to signify the concept of euthanasia, suicide, mercy killing, physician assisted suicide etc. the paper focuses on comparative study of right to die with dignity and regarding issues…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America proclaims its freedoms and rights of the people to any ear that will listen. Our country is founded on democracy and the free electoral system. Even the United Nations holds a document adopted sixty years ago entitled the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (UDHR) drafted by participating UN countries. According to this document we as human beings are said to have equal rights. Article 3 of the UDHR states “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.” (un.org, article 3) But what about the right to die? If humans are entitled to such basic rights as the right to life, then the right to die is a human right as well.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most controversial problems is whether or not the act of euthanasia should be legal. One suggestion is that it should be legal to those who are in a vegetative state, severely hopeless, and wish to no longer live. Euthanasia is the act of killing or permitting the death of a hopelessly sick or injured individuals in a relatively painless way for reasons of mercy. (Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary 11th Ed) We all have freedom of choice so those who insist on having euthanasia should have the right to receive it.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person"3 (United Nations, 1948) indeed, every individual has these rights; however, if an individual has the right to life, then should they not also have the right to die? The right to life holds jurisdiction over the right to death, but it should be differentiated that life is not the same as living. Lying in bed, incapable of movement, deprived of all senses, and unable to express or experience life is not living. The same can be said of a person so deeply infused with palliative medicine that one is incapable of fending for oneself or living to the ideal one personally believes to be fruitful and worthwhile. At what point does society decide that a heartbeat is no longer a viable form of living if one cannot experience or express oneself? The boundary between euthanasia and murder is often blurred; however, from an ethical standpoint, an individual cannot deny prolonging life causes undue physical, emotional, and mental pain. Is it right for society to deprive individuals of personal liberties by refusing to give the individual the right to die? Does everyone having the right to "life, liberty, and security of person" mean that regardless of the circumstance, an individual should have a heartbeat and when death is imminent deny that person the right to death, even when circumstances beyond human control dictate the loss of life?…

    • 1534 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the past decade the issue of euthanasia has gained vast support on both of the opposing sides, it continues to be one of the most controversial issues in modern day Britain. The most common form of euthanasia is assisted suicide in which someone suffering from a terminal illness such as multiple sclerosis would ask a family member to aid them in ending their life by whatever means necessary. The general view of euthanasia is the as straight forward as flicking a switch and should be legal based on that juvenile belief. In reality euthanasia can be dissected to reveal an array of tiers in which the simple action is not as clear-cut as it is portrayed. These tiers take the forms of passive, active, voluntary and involuntary. The view is those that oppose euthanasia is based largely on the belief in palliative care and religious reasoning, in which life is portrayed as a gift from god and ending life prematurely is fundamentally wrong. These opposing views are ethical and frequently changing and adapting based largely on public opinion conversely the views of the law is constant and until recently was never questioned yet since the introduction of the European Courts of Human Rights into Britain there has been more and more demand for reform to allow for euthanasia under certain circumstances. It is essential that both sides of the debate…

    • 2423 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The thing with euthanasia is that it is a very sensitive subject that society tends to overlook. Euthanasia is defined as the practice of ending a life prematurely in order to end pain and suffering. It is also known as mercy killing. Usually the average person who undergoes euthanasia has an incurable condition. But there are other instances where some people want their life to be ended. In many cases, it is carried out at the person's request but there are times when they may be too ill and the decision is made by relatives, medics (“pulling the plug”) or, in some instances rarely, the courts.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right to Die

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Imagine that you have come down with a disease and you have just been told that there is no cure. There in your hospital bed all you can think about is the pain and the agony you are going to have to endure for the rest of your remaining life. I for one know that I do not want to spend my last times on this earth in pain and discomfort, knowing that I will never walk again, or feed myself, or maybe ever even come back to consciousness. For years, doctors have been prohibited from helping patients to take their own lives. I believe that a terminally ill patient should have the right to decide if they have had enough. By legalizing euthanasia, also referred to as physician assisted suicide, tremendous pain and suffering of patients can be saved. The right to die should be a fundamental freedom to each person. Patients should have to right to die with their dignity intact rather than have their illness leave them as merely a shell of their former selves. These are just a few of the reasons as to why every individual should have the right to die if they are terminally ill.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most of us don’t choose (or even expect) the way in which we die, but for the terminally ill, death is a looming certainty to be dealt with. And as humans live longer – largely thanks to the interventions of modern medicine – we’re more likely to die of serious illness, and to have our deaths medically postponed. There has long been a call for governments to grant us the right to choose our own death, by legalizing euthanasia. But what are the circumstances in which this right should be granted? Who gets to decide – and when? And then there’s the sobering knowledge that this is one life decision that can’t be reversed.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to address the question presented, we must seek the definition of the word Euthanasia. “The act or practice of painlessly ending the life of an animal or a willing individual who has a terminal illness or incurable condition, as by giving a lethal drug” (www.dictionary.com). Also called Mercy Killing. In certain instances, individuals express their desire not to be put under a lot of pain and suffering whenever death is inevitable. It just seemingly looks right to state that is not an individual’s choice whether to live or die. Neither the Doctor nor the patient should be given that authority to some. However, if one wants to assume that our duty is to do what is right, we then must find out what is that makes it right in order to get a thoughtful decision onto finishing the life or a person. Supporting individuals’ rights to die with dignity must be supported because it will shorten the individual’s pressure over the situation he/she may be facing. It will lessen the pain of the family members who may have to live for a long period of time with the sadness of seeing their love one suffer. The remedy will lessen hospital costs and in addition will expedite…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays