The Right to Bear Arms with Concealed Carry
Humans naturally assume the right to be able to protect and defend their own person. This is a country built upon protecting the well-being of its people, and, more so protecting its people’s freedom, specifically the freedom to keep and bear arms. We are free to defend ourselves against others acting outside their lawful boundaries. Crime is obviously a problem in society, and we have laws in place to discourage behaviors that people agree on as wrong or that are considered to be bad for a peaceful society, but laws cannot change people. There will always be people out there who break those laws and pose threats to other citizens. Unfortunately, these incidents happen all too often and can end fatally for innocent, defenseless citizens. This is seen not only in the devastating mass shootings that we see and hear about on national news of defenseless people dying but every day from smaller scale incidents where people are shot, raped, assaulted, killed, robbed, or injured and do not have sufficient means of defending themselves in the process of someone else acting violently against the law. These incidents happen repeatedly in our society and there is not sufficient focus on what practical action steps can be taken to stop them much less hinder them. People must easily and properly be allowed an effective way of protecting and defending themselves against harm. Guns are a big part of this nation and always have been. They are owned by millions of Americans, because citizens in America posses the right in this country to have guns. It is unreasonable to think that America should or even could get rid of all the citizen-owned firearms that we have today, which would not effectively impact criminals with guns and would take away one of our traditional rights in this country. Instead, firearm possession should be encouraged by those who want to exercise this right, and they should be able to carry personal concealed handguns for self-defense. Through our natural right to self-defense and our right secured by the Constitution to keep and bear arms in this country, citizens of the United State must be allowed to carry concealed handguns with a legal permit; concealed carry is a powerful deterrent to criminals, and it does not cause increases in crime or pose risks to public safety. Guns have been a part of this country since it first began. People in America have always owned guns, and citizens have always possessed the right to bear arms. Michael Huemer states in his article on rights that people who want to get rid of all privately owned guns think that the right to own guns is insignificant and does not hold very much weight in comparison to other rights (301). Huemer goes on to state the main argument behind the natural gun rights view which is: 1. The right of self-defense is an important right.
2. A firearms prohibition would be a significant violation of the right of self- defense.
3. Therefore, a firearms prohibition would be a serious rights-violation. (306) Our natural right to self-defense holds a significant amount of weight, and the most effective means of defending yourself is by use of a personal firearm in the form of a handgun. On this basis and from Huemer’s assessment of the right to guns, the right of self-defense and the right to possess guns go hand in hand. The right to keep and bear arms has been a natural right and also one protected by the Constitution of the United States. There is a debate on what the Second Amendment means or was intended to mean, but the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that citizens have the right to possess personal firearms for the purpose of self-defense. The Second Amendment which states, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” is the subject of intense controversy (United States Constitution). The landmark...
Cited: Ehrlich, Robert. “More Guns Means More Guns.” Reason. Sep. 2001: 54-55. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 27 Nov. 2012.
Huemer, Michael. "Is There A Right To Own A Gun?." Social Theory & Practice 29.2 (2003): 297-324. Academic Search Premier. Web. 31 Oct. 2012.
Kopel, David B, “The Untold Triumph Of Concealed-Carry Permits.” Policy Review. 78. (1996): 9-11. Omnifile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 7 Nov. 2012.
Lott, John R., Jr. "Will More Guns Mean Less Crime." Consumers ' Research Magazine 1 Dec. 1998: 18-22. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 29 Oct. 2012.
O’Shea, Michael P, “Judicial Tradition And The Scope Of "Bearing Arms" For Self-Defense.” American University Law Review. 61.3 (2012): 585-676. Academic Search Premier. Web. 4 Nov. 2012.
Perkins, Sarah. “District of Columbia v. Heller: The Second Amendment Shoots One Down.” Louisiana Law Review. 70.3 (2010): 1061-1097. Omnifile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson.) Web. 26 Nov. 2012.
Richardson, Valerie. "Colorado Appeals Court: Concealed-Carry Law Applies to Universities." Human Events 3 May 2010: 16-19. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 26 Nov. 2012.
Riley, Alexander. “The Danger of Guns Is Not Debatable.” Chronicle of Higher Education. 20 July 2007: 13. OmniFile Full Text Select (H.W. Wilson). Web. 18 Dec. 2012.
Rubin, Lillian B. “Guns and Grief.” Dissent. 2007: 5-7. Web. 27 Nov. 2012.
United States Constitution. 1776. Library of Congress. Web. 17 Dec. 2012.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document