Preview

The Right Game

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
21784 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Right Game
The Right Game: Use Game Theory to Shape Strategy by Adam M. Brandenburger and Barry J. Nalebuff

Harvard Business Review
Reprint 95402

HBR
J U LY- A U G U S T 1 9 9 5

The Right Game: Use Game Theory to Shape Strategy by Adam M. Brandenburger and Barry J. Nalebuff
Business is a high-stakes game. The way we approach this game is reflected in the language we use to describe it. Business language is full of expressions borrowed from the military and from sports. Some of them are dangerously misleading. Unlike war and sports, business is not about winning and losing. Nor is it about how well you play the game. Companies can succeed spectacularly without requiring others to fail. And they can fail miserably no matter how well they play if they make the mistake of playing the wrong game. The essence of business success lies in making sure you’re playing the right game. How do you know if it’s the right game? What can you do about it if it’s the wrong game? To help managers answer those questions, we’ve developed a framework that draws on the insights of game theory. After 50 years as a mathematical construct, game theory is about to change the game of business. Game theory came of age in 1994, when three pioneers in the field were awarded the Nobel Prize. It all began in 1944, when mathematics genius John von Neumann and economist Oskar Morgenstern
PHOTOS BY CHRISTOPHER MAKOS

published their book Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Immediately heralded as one of the greatest scientific achievements of the century, their work provided a systematic way to understand the behavior of players in situations where their fortunes are interdependent. Von Neumann and Morgenstern distinguished two types of games. In the first type, rule-based games, players interact according to specified “rules of engagement.” These rules might come from contracts, loan covenants, or trade agreements, for example. In the second type, freewheeling games, players interact

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This paper gives the reader an insight into how a manager in a competitive industry in a two-firm constant sum game makes decisions. The writer will be playing the role of a Home Depot, Inc. manager, and the major competitor is Lowe’s, Inc. Home Depot is the largest United States (U.S.) home-improvement retailer while Lowe’s is the second-largest U.S. home-improvement retailer. This is significant because what one company does affects the other. To compare the two companies their company profiles were reviewed. The latest news headlines on both companies were also used in the formation of this paper. There is a reason that Home Depot is number one in this industry. Top managers, excellent products and a strong business plan to name a few, but Lowe’s is not that far behind them.…

    • 2556 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thompson, A. A., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland, A. J. (2012). Crafting and executing strategy:…

    • 1587 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Labatt Blue Case Study

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To start, ill define Game Theory by the definition in the 3) textbook, ‘The analytical framework in which two or more individuals, companies, or nations compete for certain payoffs that depend on the strategy that the others employ’.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Thompson Jr., Arthur, A., Strickland III, A.J., Gamble, John, Crafting and Executing Strategy, 17th edition, Boston, McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2010, print.…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cited: Thompson, Arthur A., A.J. Strickland III, and John E. Gamble. Crafting and Executing Strategy. 17th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2010.…

    • 2325 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: AXELROD, 1~ (1978) Copzng wzth deception, International conference on applied game theory, Vmnna LEE, V,r. (1971) Dec~szon theory and human behaviour, J. Wiley, New York LuCE, R and H ]{AIFFA (1957). Games and deczszons, J Wiley, New York. OWEN, G. (1968) Game theory, ~V. Saunders, Philadelphia.…

    • 4460 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Malhotra, D., Ku, G., & Murnighan, J. K. (2008). When winning is everything. Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 78-86. Retrieved May 15, 2008, from EBSCOhost database.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Course Overview, Philosophy, and Objectives: This course is designed as an elective for MBA and EMBA program participants that have already studied the required introductory course in strategy. It deals primarily with two highly related sets of issues: (1) How can we think about and do strategy in a world that is inherently uncertain; and (2) how can we understand and deal with the difficulties/limitations that managerial (human) cognition places on learning and adapting in an uncertain world. As you will see these two sets of issues are closely related. We live and manage in a highly turbulent, fast-paced world where risk and uncertainty permeate all important decisions. Nobody enjoys being faced with uncertainty. It makes us all feel uncomfortable. I makes us feel a lack of control. Some managers prefer to retreat to certainty, or more specifically the illusion of certainty. Such managers want to believe that the future can be forecast with enough precision to identify the “right” or “optimal” strategy. Others prefer to abandon analytical rigor entirely. These managers trust in intuition or experience to identify a workable strategy. Both approaches are likely to result in significant strategic errors and destruction of value. The course will develop tools, concepts and approaches for dealing with risk and uncertainty in both strategy and in strategists (and managers). Most of these will be widely used or best practices. Some will be based on recent research that is starting to diffuse into current managerial practice. Specifically, the learning objectives of the course are as follows: 1. Participants will develop an understanding…

    • 3734 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    mathematics that is used to predict the actions of an opponent or competitor in a certain “game.” Game theory has many applications including war, macro and microeconomics, and even biology. Game theory is a relatively new concept created by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern in 1944. Over time it has evolved into a very complex field of mathematics that has applications in many other fields. John von Neumannʼs contribution to game theory was specific to economics. He contributed the minmax theorem in 1928. This theorem stated that in certain zero sum games all players will be able to pick a strategy that will reduce the potential losses for all players. This principle was groundbreaking in all fields of economics, especially in microeconomics. Oskar…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In an economically contracting market-place, interactions between various parties to a transaction are increasing every single day. With numerous covenants guarding every deal, there is more to the market equation than simply the buyer-seller dynamic. Undoubtedly, in a perfect world, when the curtains are pulled down, and the facade is eroded, the buyer-seller dynamic is still supremely prevalent, but this sadly is not a perfect world. Thus, in business which essentially is a high stakes game, making the right decision keeping in mind the numerous variables in the equation is extremely important. Business unlike sports or war is not about winning at all costs. It is actually not about how well you play the game. Companies and organizations can succeed without requiring competitors to fail and at the same time, they can fail miserably no matter how well they played the game. We will in due course of this article, impress upon you the importance of the “GAME”. For now, assuming that the hypothesis of this so-called importance is proven, let us go over a concept which even 65 years after its origin, is yet to catch favour in day-to-day business. Game Theory came into existence in 1944 when mathematical genius John Von Neumann and economist Oskar Morgenstern published a book Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour. In this path breaking book, they distinguished broadly two types of games. One, in which the players interact according to certain “terms of engagement” or covenants as earlier mentioned. This we shall henceforth call “rule based games”. Two, in which players interact without any external factors/rules. This we shall call “free-wheeling games”. In rule based games, like Newton’s third law of motion, every action has a reaction. Not necessarily, an equal and opposite reaction, but a reaction nonetheless. Thus a smart player is one who evaluates how other…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Game Theory

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Firms can gain great negotiating power if they assess their options. It is better to change the game theory and become the leader than to play the existing game as the follower. This tactic can mean the difference between success and failure for the organization. When making corporate decisions and profit maximizing deals, research and compiling information will be the biggest impact on the firms earnings.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strategy is important as a source of long term profits. As business competes for a fair share in the , with competitors over customers, uncertainty becomes a constantly revolving battlefield for better ways of…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    About a Game

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I will split the class up into even groups, depending on how many people there are. Each group will then get into a straight line, the first person facing the board, and each person lining up directly behind them. I will hand out a piece of paper with a drawing on it, which only the group leader can see. The group leader will have to draw that image on the back of the person in front of them and so on, until it gets to the person facing the board. The person at the board has to draw what they think is being drawn on them. I will judge which is closest to the original picture. After 5 rounds, whoever has the most point’s wins. There are no verbal hints allowed. The purpose of this is to pay attention to detail and really focus on the task at hand. The winners will get a prize.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It’s a dirty little secret: Most executives cannot articulate the objective, scope, and advantage of their business in a simple statement. If they can’t, neither can anyone else.…

    • 5762 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Strategic Decision-Making

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: Clegg, S., Carter, C., Kornberger, M. & Schweitzer, J. (2011) Strategy: Theory & Practice. London : Sage.…

    • 1937 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays