The Resource-Based View (RBV) of the firm:
A framework for determining competitive heterogeneity
Tony T. Akiwumi MBA FCMI
2002 Cohort, DBA Programme,
Kingston University, Kingston, Surrey, UK
The Resource-Based View of the firm is an emerging strategic management theory of firm heterogeneity that explains the differences in firm prosperity that cannot be attributed to differences in industry conditions alone; it also exposes the resource conditions that underlie competitive advantage. The Resource-Based View of the firm argues that a firm’s sustainable competitive advantage depends on its ability to manage the institutional context of its resource decisions.
Because of the imperfections in the resource-market and the subjective managerial decisions about how these resources are acquired, developed and deployed, firms can be expected to differ in the degree to which economic rents are both realised and sustained.
Resource-Based View theory postulates that a firm achieves sustainable competitive advantage and thus enhanced economic rents only when it is able to obtain preferential access to and exploit the potential of, strategic competitive advantage-generating resources, i.e. those that are valuable, rare, inimitable and non-substitutable
This paper provides an integrated review of the Resource-Based View framework in an effort to provide a critical evaluation of the way that it has influenced the development of research and practice across key fields of management. The paper then goes on to suggest areas of research related to how a firm can achieve sustainable competitive advantage through the development expertise derived from the implementation of related and complementary Resource-Based acquisition strategies.
Keywords: Resource-Based View, Competitive Advantage
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEVELOPMENT OF THE RESOURCE-BASED FRAMEWORK
DEFINING KEY CONCEPTS
SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
Industry versus firm-specific effects
Attributes of competitive advantage generating resources
Management decisions and strategic choices
RESOURCE-BASED VIEW FRAMEWORK-A CRITICAL REVIEW
Significance of the Resource-Based View to research and practice
Human Resource Management
Problems and Weaknesses with the Resource-Based View
Resource-Based procedure for strategy development
Unit of empirical analysis
Testing and measuring the Resource-Based View
A portent for a future research agenda
Acquisition expertise as a firm-specific resource
This paper begins with the early classical economists assumption that man is a highly rational economic being; further that the desired outcome of the firm’s managerial effort is above average economic rents or profits. A firm’s profitability can be disaggregated into two key elements: the industry average and the firm-specific divergence from that average attributable to the competitive advantage enjoyed by that firm as a result of its particular strategy.
The concept of competitive advantage as used in the business context is clearly derived from the economic and militaristic origins of the strategy literature (Whittington, 1993). The term strategy is derived from the ancient Greek words strategos – a general, stratos – an army and agein – to lead, and has only been used...
References: Barney, J.B., 1986, "Types of competition and the theory of strategy: toward an integrating framework", Academy of Management Review, 11, pp. 656-65.
Barney, J.B, 1991, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 17, pp. 99-120.
Barney, J.B, 2001, "The Resource-Based View of the firm: Ten years after 1991", Journal of Management, 27, pp. 625-641.
Barney, J.B, 2002, Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage, 2nd ed, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Barney, J.B. and Ouchi, W.G., 1986, Organisational Economics, Jossey-Bass Publishers, London.
Boxall, P., 1998, "Achieving competitive advantage through human resource strategy: towards a theory of industry dynamics", Human Resource Management Review, 8, pp. 265-288.
Chamberlin, E.H., 1933, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cool, K., Schendel, D, 1988, "Performance differences among strategic group members", Strategic Management Journal, 9, pp. 207-33.
Dierickx, I., Cool, K, 1989, "Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage", Management Science, 35, pp. 1504-11.
Fahy, J., 2000, "The Resource-Based View of the firm: some stumbling-blocks on the road to understanding sustainable competitive advantage", Journal of European Industrial Training, 24, pp. 94-104
Foss, N., 1997, "The Resource-Based Perspective: An Assessment and Diagnosis of Problems", DRUID Working Paper, 97.
Ghemawat, P, 2002, "Competition and business strategy in historical perspective", Business History Review, 76, pp. 37-74.
Grant, R.M, 1991, "The Resource-Based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation", California Management Review, 33, pp. 114-35.
Harrison, J. S., Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Ireland, R. D. 2001. "Resource complementarity in business combinations: Extending the logic to organizational alliances". Journal of Management, 27: pp. 679¯690.
Hitt, M. A., Harrison, J. S., & Ireland, R. D. 2001. Mergers and acquisitions: A guide to creating value for stakeholders. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ireland, R. D., & Miller, C. C. 2001. "Intuition in strategic decision making". Working paper, University of Richmond.
Kay, J, 1993, "The structure of strategy", Business Strategy Review, 4, pp. 17-37.
Kim, K-H and Olsen, M.D., 1999, "Determinants of successful acquisition processes in the US lodging industry", International Journal of Hospitality Management, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp. 285-308.
Mahoney, J.T, Pandian, J.R, 1992, "The Resource-Based View within the conversation of strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 13, pp. 363-80.
Moingeon, B., Ramanantsoa, B., Metais, E. and Orton, J. D., (1998), "Another look at strategy-structure relationships: The Resource-Based View", ScienceDirect – European Management Journal, 16, pp. 297-305.
Oliver, C, 1997, "Sustainable competitive advantage: combining institutional and Resource-Based Views", Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp. 697-713.
Penrose, E, 1959, The Theory of Growth of the Firm, Blackwell, Oxford.
Porter, M.E, 1980, Competitive Strategy, The Free Press, New York, NY.
Prahalad, C.K, Hamel, G, 1990, "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard Business Review, 68, pp. 79-91.
Robinson, J., 1933, The Economics of Imperfect Competition, Macmillan Press, London.
Rumelt, R.P, 1984, Towards a strategic theory of the firm, Lamb, R.B, Competitive Strategic Management, Prentice-Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ, 566-70.
Rumelt, R.P, 1991, "How much does industry matter?", Strategic Management Journal, 12, 167-85.
Rumelt, R.P., Schendel, D.; Teece, D. 1994, Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
Shapiro, C.; (1989) "The theory of business strategy", RAND Journal of Economics, 20, 1, pp. 125-137.
Srivastava, R. K.; Fahey, L. and Christensen, H. K.; (2001) "The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage", Journal of Management, 27, 6, pp. 777-802.
Teece, D.J, Pisano, G, Shuen, A, 1997, "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management", Strategic Management Journal, 18, pp. 509-33.
Teece, D, J.; (1980) ‘Economics of scope and the scope of the enterprise’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 1, pp. 223-247.
Teece, D, J.; (1982) ‘Towards an ecominc theory of the multiproduct firm’, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 3, pp. 39-63.
Wernerfelt, B, 1984, "A Resource-Based View of the firm", Strategic Management Journal, 5, pp. 171-80.
Whittington, R, 1993, What Is Strategy and Does it Matter?, Routledge, London.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document