Preview

The Relationship Between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
8957 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Relationship Between the Environmental and Financial Performance of Public Utilities
Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 137–157, 2004.
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

137

The Relationship between the Environmental and
Financial Performance of Public Utilities
GREG FILBECK1 and RAYMOND F. GORMAN2,∗

1 Adjunct Professor of Finance, University of Wisconsin – La Crosse; Senior Vice-President,
Schweser Study Program, 1905 Palace Street, LaCrosse, WI 54603, USA; 2 Miami University,
School of Business Administration, Oxford, OH 45056, USA; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: gormanrf@muohio.edu) Accepted 11 December 2003
Abstract. A growing body of research has centered on the issue of the relationship between financial and environmental performance. The lack of consensus in this literature can be attributed to several factors. The cost of complying with environmental regulation can be significant and detrimental to shareholder wealth maximization. Conversely, a firm that can effectively control pollution might also be able to effectively control other costs of production and hence earn a higher rate of return.
We utilize data from the Investor Responsibility Research Center as well as a proprietary database to investigate the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance in electric utilities. Utilities, as producers and distributors of energy, produce substantial amounts of pollution.
However, since public utilities are regulated, studying the financial and environmental performance of utilities affords us the opportunity to see what role regulation plays in enhancing or diminishing the relationship between financial and environmental performance. Our results differ from earlier studies in that we find do not find a positive relationship between holding period returns and an industry-adjusted measure of environmental performance nor do we find that regulatory climate appears to explain returns. While there does not appear to be a clearly defined relationship between



References: Archer, S. (1981), ‘The Regulatory Effects on Cost of Capital in Electric Utilities’, Public Utilities Fortnightly 107(18), 36–39. Barth, M. and M. McNichols (1994), ‘Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities Relating to Superfund Sites’, Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Supplement), 177–209. Blacconiere W. and W. D. Northcut (1997), ‘Environmental Information and Market Reactions to Environmental Legislation’, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 12(2), 149–178. Blum, G., J. Blumberg and A. Korsvold (1996), ‘Environmental Performance and Shareholder Value’, World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Campbell K., S. Sefcik and N. Soderstrom (1998), ‘Site Uncertainty, Allocation Uncertainty, and Superfund Liability Valuation’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17(4/5), 331–366. Chen K. H. and R. W. Metcalf (1980), ‘The Relationship between Pollution Control Records and Financial Indicators Revisited and Further Comment’, Accounting Review 55(1), 168–185. Cochran P. and R. Wood (1984), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 27(1), 42–56. Cohen, M. A., S. A. Fenn and S. Konar (1995), ‘Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related?’ Investor Responsibility Research Center. Cormier D., M. Magnum and B. Morard (1993), ‘The Impact of Corporate Pollution on Market Valuation: Some Empirical Evidence’, Ecological Economics 8, 135–155. Dubin, J. and P. Navarro (1982), ‘Regulatory Climate and the Cost of Capital’, in M. A. Crew, ed., Regulatory Reform and Public Utilities Erfle S. and M. Fratantuono (1992), ‘Interrelations Among Corporate Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Financial Performance: An Empirical Investigation’, Working paper, Dickinson Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1992), ‘The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns’, Journal of Finance 47(2), 427–465. Filbeck, G., R. Gorman and G. Vora (1997), ‘Stock Price Reaction to Equity Issues of Public Utilities: The Influence of Regulatory Climate’, Managerial and Decision Economics 18(7/8), 731–745. Gorman, R. and G. Vora (1993), ‘An Examination of Regulatory Regime and Public Utility Underwriting Costs from an Agency Perspective’, Journal of Business Research 28(3), 211–224. Hamilton, J. T. (1995), ‘Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release Inventory Data’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28, 98–113. Hart, S. and A. Gautum (1996), “Does It Pay to be Green? An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance’, Business Strategy and the Hays, W. L. and R. L. Winkler (1975), Statistics: Probability, Inference, and Decision, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Investor Responsibility Research Center, Corporate Environmental Profiles Directory (1992) (Washington, DC: IRRC). Klassen, R. D. and C. P. McLaughlin (1996), ‘The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm Performance’, Management Science 42, 1199–1213. Karpoff, J. M. and J. R. Lott Jr. (1993), ‘The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing Criminal Fraud’, Journal of Law and Economics 36(2), 757–802. King, A. and M. Lenox (2002), ‘Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction’, Management Science 48(2), 289–299. Konar, S. and M. Cohen (1997), ‘Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to Know Laws on Toxic Emissions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1), Konar, S. and M. Cohen (2001), ‘Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?’ The Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2), 281–289. Mahapatra, S. (1984), ‘Investor Reaction to Corporate Social Accounting’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 11(1), 29–40. Maxwell, J. W., T. P. Lyon and S. C. Hackett (2000), ‘Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism’, Journal of Law and Economics 43(2), 583– McInerney, F. and S. White (1997), The Total Quality Corporation. New York: Truman Talley Books/Plume. McGuire, J., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis (1988), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 31(4), 854–872. Navarro, P. (1983), ‘How Wall Street Ranks the Public Utility Commissions’, Financial Analysts Journal 39(6), 46–49. Palmer, K., W. E. Oates and P. R. Portney (1995), ‘Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit– Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 119–132. Phillips Jr., C. (1988), The Regulation of Public Utilities: Theory and Practice. Arlington, Virginia: Public Utilities Reports. Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995), ‘Toward a New Conception of the EnvironmentalCompetitiveness Relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 97–118. Rao, R. and R. Moyer, 1994, ‘Regulatory Climate and Electric Utility Capital Structure Decisions’, Financial Review 29(1), 97–124. Reed, D. (1998), Green Shareholder Value: Hype or Hit? Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Segerson, K. and T. Tietenberg (1992), ‘The Structure of Penalties in Environmental Enforcement: An Economic Analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23(2), 179–200. Sharpe, W. (1966), ‘Mutual Fund Performance’, Journal of Business 39(1), 119–138. Sharpe, W. (1994), ‘The Sharpe Ratio’, The Journal of Portfolio Management 21(1), 49–58. Smart, B. (1992), Beyond Compliance, A New Industry View of the Environment. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Spicer B. H. (1978), ‘Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Informational Disclosure: An Empirical Study’, Accounting Review 53, 94–111. Stinson C. and S. Schaltegger (1993), Environmental Accounting, working paper, University of Texas at Austin. Treynor, J. (1966), ‘How to Rate Management Investment Funds’, Harvard Business Review 43, 63–75. US Environmental Protection Agency (1990), ‘Environmental Investments: The Cost of a Clean Environment, Report Summary of the Administrator of the EPA to the Congress of the United Vance S. (1975), ‘Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks’, Management Review 64, 18–24. White M. A. (1991), ‘Green Investing: The Recent Performance of Environmentally-Oriented Mutual Funds’, McIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia, July.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Government regulation is when they impose a wide range of laws and regulations to influence the way the market works. The current regulator of the UK energy industry is OFGEM, and they are currently investigating into all of the big 6 energy suppliers that dominate the UK market. The main reason behind government intervention is to reduce or prevent market failure. Market failure is defined as the failure to allocate resources efficiently. The UK energy market is said to be failing because of the of the suppliers monopoly power. This allows them to exploit the UK customers as thy have no other choice but to stay with the big 6 because of the lack of completion, there is also strong evidence that they are also colluding on the price of their service. Evidence c shows that Npowers price for gas rose by 8.8% and 9.2% for electricity, this huge increase in price alongside with the 25% rise in profits shows their clear ability to exploit their consumers.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jegadeesh, Narasimhan , “Evidence of predictable behavior of security returns,” Journal of Finance 45, 881-898., 1990…

    • 4112 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ambit Energy Case

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The Federal Energy Agency started energy deregulation in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, mostly because many local energy companies such as New York’s RG&E, had formed monopolies, they also felt that these companies were using outdated, inefficient generating plants. Consumers had no choice, and were forced to pay escalated energy costs based on solo area providers. It has taken several years and a lot of red tape, but 3rd party energy service companies known as ESCOs, were finally let into the marketplace to compete for your business. Energy is now regulated by some states, only about 22 states; including New York…

    • 3132 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Electric Utility Industry: The electric utility industry is formed by three segments: generation, transmission and distribution. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is the regulating authority for the utilities with interstate systems or substantial investments in assets not related to the core operation of the utility. In order to avoid SEC supervision, the industry had evolved into a large number of intrastate, and relatively undiversified, utility companies operating under extensive regulation.…

    • 2437 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    while still maintaining a reasonable price point. In order to keep prices low and produce products…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For over 100 years, electricity was a regulated industry in the United States. This practice required consumers to purchase electricity directly from monopolized utility companies where prices are regulated by the government. A law was enacted in California that called for the deregulation of energy. With deregulation, consumers would be able to select their preferred suppliers and prices would no longer be governed by a regulatory body. Although consumers in California believed that they would start paying less for their electricity, deregulation led to schemes of market manipulation in 2000 and 2001 by major energy companies, including Enron Corporation.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fpl Group

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    · The management is concerned by the “increasing risk facing the industry”. Deregulation in the utility industry ( Exhibit 1 – wholesale wheeling)…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Policy at Fpl Group

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity was classified as the vital public service. Under the regulation by government agency, the monopoly could supply electricity power to public. In Florida, where FPL located, the Florida Public Service commission functioned as a regulatory agency. In 1935, the federal government started involving in electric power industry with the federal power act. This authority was focused on wholesale electricity transactions. Simultaneously, PUHCA ( the Public Utility Holding Company Act) was passed that SEC got a control over utilities other than the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity.…

    • 2269 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    January Effect Examination

    • 2290 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Wachtel (1942) was the first to document seasonality in the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1927 to 1942. He showed rising returns from December to January in eleven of fifteen years studied. Rozeff & Kinney (1976) found statistically significant differences in mean returns for months on the US stock market. Jones & Wilson (1989) tested the January Effect on seven assets from 1871 to 1986 and found strong seasonality in returns in US markets.…

    • 2290 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2) Is able to make sizable investment in improvement (R&D, management), which contributes to more attractive products and lower costs…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We shall see in this article that there is now substantial evidence supporting Samuelson’s dictum where market inefficiency is defined as predictability of future (excess) returns. We will also present a new test and scatter diagram that clarifies the truth in this dictum. Samuelson’s dictum is plausible if there is much more information available to the market about future changes in fundamentals (the…

    • 5657 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout the world governments are giving large corporations a lot of leeway or deregulation. In Russia for example, the government have deregulated their laws concerning in the electricity sector. Railroads and communal utilities are also something that was recently deregulated by the government. Both of these called for the development of better technologies, better and more efficient ways of using energy. Better ways…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citations: (this article cites 33 articles hosted on the SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms): http://tap.sagepub.com/cgi/content/refs/18/1/27…

    • 8752 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In conclusion, this case study may allow us to further reline the proposed relationship, while survey studies may develop and test hypotheses from our suggestion. Once more empirical evidence has been gained, this line of research may…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hansen, Kumar and Shome (1994) take a broader view of what constitutes agency costs, and apply a variant of the cost minimization model to the regulated electric utility industry…

    • 11527 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Good Essays