Environmental and Resource Economics 29: 137–157, 2004.
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
The Relationship between the Environmental and
Financial Performance of Public Utilities
GREG FILBECK1 and RAYMOND F. GORMAN2,∗
1 Adjunct Professor of Finance, University of Wisconsin – La Crosse; Senior Vice-President, Schweser Study Program, 1905 Palace Street, LaCrosse, WI 54603, USA; 2 Miami University, School of Business Administration, Oxford, OH 45056, USA; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org)
Accepted 11 December 2003
Abstract. A growing body of research has centered on the issue of the relationship between ﬁnancial and environmental performance. The lack of consensus in this literature can be attributed to several factors. The cost of complying with environmental regulation can be signiﬁcant and detrimental to shareholder wealth maximization. Conversely, a ﬁrm that can effectively control pollution might also be able to effectively control other costs of production and hence earn a higher rate of return. We utilize data from the Investor Responsibility Research Center as well as a proprietary database to investigate the relationship between environmental performance and ﬁnancial performance in electric utilities. Utilities, as producers and distributors of energy, produce substantial amounts of pollution. However, since public utilities are regulated, studying the ﬁnancial and environmental performance of utilities affords us the opportunity to see what role regulation plays in enhancing or diminishing the relationship between ﬁnancial and environmental performance. Our results differ from earlier studies in that we ﬁnd do not ﬁnd a positive relationship between holding period returns and an industry-adjusted measure of environmental performance nor do we ﬁnd that regulatory climate appears to explain returns. While there does not appear to be a clearly deﬁned relationship between regulatory climate and a compliance based measure of environmental performance, there is evidence of a negative relationship between ﬁnancial return and a more pro-active measure of environmental performance. We offer several possible interpretations of these results and extensions for future research.
Key words: environment, performance, public utilities, regulation JEL classiﬁcations: G38, L94, Q30
Until somewhat recently, the ﬁnancial markets and the ﬁnancial economics literature largely ignored environmental performance as a criterion to assess whether a company is a good investment. Typically, the market paid attention only in cases where the ﬁnancial analysts determined that poor environmental management would create liabilities that would adversely affect the ﬁrm value. As such, the focus had almost entirely been on the negative side of valuation, on risk and
GREG FILBECK AND RAYMOND F. GORMAN
exposure to environmental liabilities rather than on environmental performance as a success factor. The case for looking upon environmental cost drivers as creators of values, as opposed to treating them purely as potential liabilities, had not been effectively communicated to investors. This undoubtedly made it more difﬁcult for investors to identify, and then to evaluate, the ﬁnancial consequences of environmental activities.
More recently, the relationship between corporate environmental and ﬁnancial performance has attracted increasing attention in the empirical literature as well as in the business community. The traditional perspective viewed environmental expenditures, whether on waste treatment and removal or pollution prevention strategy, as a drain on ﬁrm resources and a commitment of funds to non-productive uses (Palmer et al. 1995). However, a growing movement argues that pollution prevention and the associated re-evaluation of a ﬁrm’s production processes creates opportunity for the ﬁrm to strategically alter production (e.g., to...
References: Archer, S. (1981), ‘The Regulatory Effects on Cost of Capital in Electric Utilities’, Public Utilities
Fortnightly 107(18), 36–39.
Barth, M. and M. McNichols (1994), ‘Estimation and Market Valuation of Environmental Liabilities
Relating to Superfund Sites’, Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Supplement), 177–209.
Blacconiere W. and W. D. Northcut (1997), ‘Environmental Information and Market Reactions to
Environmental Legislation’, Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 12(2), 149–178.
Blum, G., J. Blumberg and A. Korsvold (1996), ‘Environmental Performance and Shareholder
Value’, World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
Campbell K., S. Sefcik and N. Soderstrom (1998), ‘Site Uncertainty, Allocation Uncertainty, and
Superfund Liability Valuation’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 17(4/5), 331–366.
Chen K. H. and R. W. Metcalf (1980), ‘The Relationship between Pollution Control Records and
Financial Indicators Revisited and Further Comment’, Accounting Review 55(1), 168–185.
Cochran P. and R. Wood (1984), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’,
Academy of Management Journal 27(1), 42–56.
Cohen, M. A., S. A. Fenn and S. Konar (1995), ‘Environmental and Financial Performance: Are
They Related?’ Investor Responsibility Research Center.
Cormier D., M. Magnum and B. Morard (1993), ‘The Impact of Corporate Pollution on Market
Valuation: Some Empirical Evidence’, Ecological Economics 8, 135–155.
Dubin, J. and P. Navarro (1982), ‘Regulatory Climate and the Cost of Capital’, in M. A. Crew, ed.,
Regulatory Reform and Public Utilities
Erﬂe S. and M. Fratantuono (1992), ‘Interrelations Among Corporate Social Performance, Social
Disclosure, and Financial Performance: An Empirical Investigation’, Working paper, Dickinson
Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1992), ‘The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns’, Journal of
Finance 47(2), 427–465.
Filbeck, G., R. Gorman and G. Vora (1997), ‘Stock Price Reaction to Equity Issues of Public Utilities:
The Inﬂuence of Regulatory Climate’, Managerial and Decision Economics 18(7/8), 731–745.
Gorman, R. and G. Vora (1993), ‘An Examination of Regulatory Regime and Public Utility
Underwriting Costs from an Agency Perspective’, Journal of Business Research 28(3), 211–224.
Hamilton, J. T. (1995), ‘Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release
Inventory Data’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28, 98–113.
Hart, S. and A. Gautum (1996), “Does It Pay to be Green? An Empirical Examination of the
Relationship Between Emission Reduction and Firm Performance’, Business Strategy and the
Hays, W. L. and R. L. Winkler (1975), Statistics: Probability, Inference, and Decision, 2nd ed. New
York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Investor Responsibility Research Center, Corporate Environmental Proﬁles Directory (1992) (Washington, DC: IRRC).
Klassen, R. D. and C. P. McLaughlin (1996), ‘The Impact of Environmental Management on Firm
Performance’, Management Science 42, 1199–1213.
Karpoff, J. M. and J. R. Lott Jr. (1993), ‘The Reputational Penalty Firms Bear from Committing
Criminal Fraud’, Journal of Law and Economics 36(2), 757–802.
King, A. and M. Lenox (2002), ‘Exploring the Locus of Proﬁtable Pollution Reduction’, Management Science 48(2), 289–299.
Konar, S. and M. Cohen (1997), ‘Information As Regulation: The Effect of Community Right to
Know Laws on Toxic Emissions’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32(1),
Konar, S. and M. Cohen (2001), ‘Does the Market Value Environmental Performance?’ The Review
of Economics and Statistics 83(2), 281–289.
Mahapatra, S. (1984), ‘Investor Reaction to Corporate Social Accounting’, Journal of Business
Finance and Accounting 11(1), 29–40.
Maxwell, J. W., T. P. Lyon and S. C. Hackett (2000), ‘Self-Regulation and Social Welfare: The
Political Economy of Corporate Environmentalism’, Journal of Law and Economics 43(2), 583–
McInerney, F. and S. White (1997), The Total Quality Corporation. New York: Truman Talley
McGuire, J., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis (1988), ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm
Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 31(4), 854–872.
Navarro, P. (1983), ‘How Wall Street Ranks the Public Utility Commissions’, Financial Analysts
Journal 39(6), 46–49.
Palmer, K., W. E. Oates and P. R. Portney (1995), ‘Tightening Environmental Standards: The Beneﬁt–
Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 119–132.
Phillips Jr., C. (1988), The Regulation of Public Utilities: Theory and Practice. Arlington, Virginia:
Public Utilities Reports.
Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995), ‘Toward a New Conception of the EnvironmentalCompetitiveness Relationship’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4), 97–118.
Rao, R. and R. Moyer, 1994, ‘Regulatory Climate and Electric Utility Capital Structure Decisions’,
Financial Review 29(1), 97–124.
Reed, D. (1998), Green Shareholder Value: Hype or Hit? Washington, DC: World Resources
Segerson, K. and T. Tietenberg (1992), ‘The Structure of Penalties in Environmental Enforcement:
An Economic Analysis’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23(2), 179–200.
Sharpe, W. (1966), ‘Mutual Fund Performance’, Journal of Business 39(1), 119–138.
Sharpe, W. (1994), ‘The Sharpe Ratio’, The Journal of Portfolio Management 21(1), 49–58.
Smart, B. (1992), Beyond Compliance, A New Industry View of the Environment. Washington, DC:
World Resources Institute.
Spicer B. H. (1978), ‘Investors, Corporate Social Performance and Informational Disclosure: An
Empirical Study’, Accounting Review 53, 94–111.
Stinson C. and S. Schaltegger (1993), Environmental Accounting, working paper, University of Texas
Treynor, J. (1966), ‘How to Rate Management Investment Funds’, Harvard Business Review 43,
US Environmental Protection Agency (1990), ‘Environmental Investments: The Cost of a Clean
Environment, Report Summary of the Administrator of the EPA to the Congress of the United
Vance S. (1975), ‘Are Socially Responsible Corporations Good Investment Risks’, Management
Review 64, 18–24.
White M. A. (1991), ‘Green Investing: The Recent Performance of Environmentally-Oriented Mutual
Funds’, McIntire School of Commerce, University of Virginia, July.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document