The Relationship Between Leadership and Personality

Topics: Leadership, Situational leadership theory, Big Five personality traits Pages: 40 (10702 words) Published: February 27, 2013
The Relationship
Between Leadership
and Personality
Andrew J. Marsiglia, PhD, CCP
People that have task-oriented personality types tend
to have considerable focus on details. They are not
comfortable initiating an action-plan until they are
satisfied they have all the necessary facts. On the
other hand, people who have relations-oriented
personality types tend to have considerable focus on
the result and are comfortable initiating an action plan when they have just the essential facts. Therefore, it is important for a leader to understand
personality and accurately adjust leadership style to
the management situation.

www.lead-inspire.com
August 2005

The Relationship between leadership and Personality
Andrew J. Marsiglia, PhD, CCP
August 2005
People who have task-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on details. They are not comfortable initiating an action-plan until they are satisfied they have all the necessary facts. On the other hand, people who have relations-oriented personality types tend to have considerable focus on the result and are comfortable initiating an action-plan when they have just the essential facts (Blake & Mouton, 1982). Therefore, it is important for a leader to understand personality and accurately adjust leadership style to the management situation. Bass (1990) states,

Personality theorists tended to regard leadership as a one-way effect: Leaders possess qualities that differentiate them from followers. But these theorists did not acknowledge the extent to which leaders and followers have interactive effects by determining which qualities of followers are of consequence in a situation. (p. 12) Personality predicted leadership emergence across a variety of people and settings. Lord (1986) states, “In short, personality traits are associated with leadership emergence to a higher degree and more consistently than popular literature indicates” (p. 407). In addition, Barrick and Mount (1993) have found a significant association between personality and job performance. The combination of leadership style and personality type appears to meld into a psychological combination that produces the ethos of a leader. “Leaders are not just identified by their leadership styles, but also by their personalities, their awareness of themselves and others, and their appreciation of diversity, flexibility, and paradox” (Handbury, 2001, p. 11). In addition, McGregor (1960) states, “It is quite unlikely that there is a single basic pattern of abilities and personality trait characteristics of all leaders. The personality characteristics of the leader are not unimportant, but those which are essential differ considerably depending on the circumstances” | Relationship Between Leadership and Personality

1

(p. 180). Therefore, it may indeed, make a difference in ascertaining personality type in order to determine the correct job match between an employee and his or her colleagues. Historical Overview

The ancient era of leadership theory, from about 2300 B.C. to 1A.D., was characterized by the idea of leaders being great men who were sources of authority and justice. Leaders were expected to behave in a manner imagined by their society and culture as appropriate for a particular role such as a king, chief, prince, or prophet. They were considered to be heroic, inspirational and endowed with special leadership power that enabled them to capture their follower’s imagination (Bass, 1990). So powerful was this effect that when Woods (1913) examined the evolution of leadership in 14 countries over a 14-century period, he concluded that the great-man leaders made their nation and shaped it in accordance with their abilities. The classical era of leadership range from 1 A.D. to 1869 and the neoclassical era range from 1870 to 1939 encompassing a substantial portion of the industrial era. During the Industrial era, organization theories were based on social, demographic, and...

References: Aczel, A. D. (1996). Complete Business Statistics (3rd ed.). Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Argyris, C. (1957). Personality and organization. New York: Harper.
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job
performance: A meta-analysis
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1993). Autonomy as a moderator of the relationship between
the Big-Five personality dimensions and job performance
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Gupta, R. (2003). Meta-analysis of the relationship between the
five-factor model of personality and Holland 's occupational types
Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Judge, T. A. (2001). Personality and performance at the
beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? International
Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill 's handbook of leadership: Theory,
research, and managerial applications (3rd ed.)
Behling, O., & Rauch, C. F. J. (1985). A functional perspective on improving leadership
effectiveness
Bernardin, J. H., & Alvares, K. M. (1976). The managerial grid as a predictor of conflict
resolution method and managerial effectiveness
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. (1966). Managerial Facades. Advanced Management Journal, 31(3),
30-33.
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. (1982). A comparative analysis of situationalism and 9,9
management by principle
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. (1985). The managerial grid III: The key to leadership excellence.
Blake, R. R., Mouton, J., Sloma, R. L., & Loftin, B. P. (1968). A second breakthrough in
organization development
Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1976). When scholarship fails, research falters: A reply to
Bernardin and Alvares
Blake, R. R., Mouton, J. S., Barnes, L. B., & Greiner, L. E. (1964). Breakthrough in
Organization Development
Blanchard, K. (2001a). Situational leadership and situational leadership II: Comparing the two
models (White Paper)
Blanchard, K. (2001b). Situational leadership II: Developing competence, gaining commitment,
retaining talent (Company Report 13526)
Blanchard, K. H., & Hersey, P. (1996). Great ideas revisited: Life-cycle theory of leadership.
Blanchard, K. H., & Johnson, S. (1985). Leadership and the one-minute manager: Increasing
effectiveness through situational leadership
Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Bryman, A., & Stephens, M. (1996). The importance of context: Qualitative research and the
study of leadership
Chan, K. Y., & Drasgow, F. (2001). Toward a theory of individual differences and leadership:
understanding the motivation to lead
Chemers, M. (1997). An integrated theory of leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Chemers, M. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group Dynamics:
Theory, research, and practice, 4(1), 27-43.
(2000). Exploring the relationship of leadership skills and knowledge to leader performance.
Cowley, W. H. (1928). Three distinctions in the study of leaders. In B. M. Bass (Ed.), Bass &
Stogdill 's handbook of leadership: Theory, research & Managerial applications (3 ed., pp.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Education research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative
and qualitative research
Day, D. R., & Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Leader behavior of male and female supervisors: A
comparative study
Deluga, R. J. (1994). Supervisor trust building, leader-member exchange and organizational
citizenship behavior
Dhar, U., & Mishra, P. (2001). Leadership effectiveness: A study of constituent factors. Journal
of Management Research, 1(4), 254-266.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the big-five. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 73(6), 1246-1256.
Farren, C., & Kaye, B. (1996). New skills for new leadership roles. In F. Hesselbein & J.
Fernandez, C. F., & Vecchio, R. P. (1997). Situational leadership theory revisited: A test of an
across-jobs perspective
Fiedler, F. E. (1967). Theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fiedler, F. E. (1971). Personality and situational determinants of leader behavior (Technical
Report)
Fiedler, F. E. (1976). The leadership game: Matching the man to the situation. Organizational
Dynamics, 4(3), 6-16.
Fiedler, F. E. (2000). Leadership research and theory: A functional integration. Group
Dynamics: Theory, research, and practice, 4(1), 27-43.
Fiedler, F. E., & Garcia, J. E. (1987). Improving leadership effectiveness: Cognitive resources
and organizational performance
Fielder, F. E. (1998). The leadership situation: A missing factor in selecting and training
managers
Forum, P. o. t. t. C. I. E. (2004). Proceedings of the third Construction Industry Executive Forum
(Report)
Furnham, A. (2001). Vocational preference and P-O fit: Reflections on Holland 's theory of
vocational choice
George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behaivior in groups. Journal of Applied
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Relationship Between Management and Leadership Essay
  • The Link Between Big Five Personality Dimensions & Leadership Essay
  • Leadership and personality Essay
  • Personality and Leadership Essay
  • Essay on LEADERSHIP
  • Relationship Between Students Personality Traits and Their Academic Achievement Essay
  • Personality and Leadership style Research Paper
  • Essay about leadership

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free