Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Reign of King Andrew Jackson

Good Essays
735 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Reign of King Andrew Jackson
“The Reign of King Andrew”

President Andrew Jackson might have lived a common man’s youth, but he eventually

transformed his life of poverty into that of a king. As Jackson grew older he became a powerful

ambitious man and was ready to assert his influence throughout his presidency. Jackson left a

memorable legacy with his days in office that included forceful removal of Native Americans,

setting off the Spoils System into the American Government, and turning the presidential veto

into an executive weapon; making use of it more than any other president before him.

One of the most controversial events that occurred during Jackson’s presidency was the

“Trail of Tears”. Jackson, a strong oppose of Native American rights, issued the “Indian

Removal Act” which ordered for Indian relocation from their homeland to west of the

Mississippi River; this relocation was meant to be voluntary, but it was not. In 1832, the

Supreme Court mandated that the Cherokee had rights on their own land and did not need to

abide by Georgia’s claims for their land. Jackson ignored the ruling and forced the Cherokee

along with many other tribes to go relocate west of the Mississippi. Jackson’s decision to do this

was considered extremely unconstitutional by many people outside of the Democratic-

Republicans.

President Jackson was heavily against the Bank of the United States. It had the most

power out of any bank in America and Jackson did not agree with this monopolistic kind of

banking. The National Bank controlled most of the country’s gold and silver. Jackson had a

fierce rivalry with the president of the bank, Nicholas Biddle. The fighting between Jackson and

Biddle began in 1832, when Henry Clay and Daniel Webster presented a bill requesting a re-

charter of the National Bank to Congress. The bill was passed by Congress, but was grudgingly

vetoed by President Jackson. The veto did not only stop the bank bill, but enhanced the power of

the President. Jackson claimed that the bank was unconstitutional, but really actually said that he

personally thought it was harmful to the nation. Earlier, the Supreme Court approved the U.S.

Bank and did believe it to be constitutional. Jackson developed a plan to slowly decrease the

amount of money in the bank. He started using the money to pay for Government expenses. With

this steady decline of money, the National Bank would surely die.

Jackson’s distaste for using federal dollars was also revealed in the veto of the Maysville

Road Bill. The Maysville Road Bill offered the federal government to buy out $150,000 in stock

to pay for a 60-mile road reaching from the town of Maysville and Lexington, which would

provide as an extension off of the Cumberland and National Roads. The House of

Representatives voted 103 to 87 passing the bill through Congress. Jackson vetoed the bill,

saying that using federal spending on a single U.S. state was unconstitutional. Jackson even

admitted that was not against the road, but simply believed the state should fund the project and

not the federal government.

When Jackson refused to re-charter the U.S. Bank in 1832, he alternatively chose to

deposit government funds in state banks. The state banks faced hardly any regulation so they

freely gave out loans of paper money to basically anyone who requested it. This caused a

combination of land speculation and inflation to damage the economy. Jackson issued his

Species Circular to halt these dangerous trends. The order mandated that federal land could only

be bought with gold and silver, and no longer with paper money. Jackson’s idea was that hard

money was the only trustworthy currency. The Species Circular ended up doing more harm than

good and eventually contributed to the Panic of 1837.

Jackson’s legacy can best be defined by his powerful personality and the strong emotions

that others had for him, good or bad. He was involved in fierce hatreds, and the debate on

whether his political positions were based off personal preference is still argued. Jackson

alienated and ridiculed almost all who crossed him, including Nicholas Biddle and Henry Clay.

Some historians praise his strength and direct nature, while others see him as nothing more than

a self-obsessed and vengeful politician. To admirers he represents a symbol of American

Democracy. To detractors he stands as an unjust tyrant, compared to that of an American Caesar.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson had many similar views of the constitution as Thomas Jefferson when he became president. None of this was more apparent than with his feud with Nicholas Biddle and the national bank. He believed that there shouldn't be a national bank only state banks, or as his opponents called them “pet banks”. He said that the bank wasn't in the constitution itself and therefor would veto the recharter of the bank in 1832. He then withdrew all of the government deposits from the 2nd national bank and deposited them into the state banks. Although the national bank wasn't in the constitution, his opponents believe that his personal hatred toward the bank drove his reasoning, not the constitutionality of the bank itself.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the most important chapters of Andrew Jackson’s presidency was his “war” against the Federal bank. Jackson's stubborn skepticism of aristocrat institutions escalated into a highly personal battle between and the president of the bank, Nicholas Biddle. Economically speaking Jackson strongly opposed federal power and did almost everything in his power to destroy the successful bank which he deemed a Monster. The actions of Jackson included defeating the bank’s supporters politically and crushing the bank itself economically.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson’s presidency also focused on issues of westward expansion. Pursuing paths of “civilization,” Native Americans of the Southeast engaged in extensive agricultural and educational development. But pressure from white settlers and from the state governments proved overwhelming, and Jackson finally supported the forced removal of all southeastern Indians to Oklahoma along the “Trail of Tears.”…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Democracy Dbq

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages

    let him enforce it." Jackson claimed that the "common man" wanted the Indians removed and…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jackson's Democrats were committed to western expansion, but such expansion meant confrontation with the Indians who inhabited the land east of the Mississippi.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Born into poverty on the South Carolina frontier in 1767, Andrew Jackson understood all the disadvantages of being poor. Therefore, as the seventh president of the United States, Jackson made sure that his abilities were put to good use. He made sure that the common people had the same opportunities and benefits as the riches. An example of this heroic action is his battle with the Bank of the United States (263). President Jackson saw that the National Bank benefited wealthy eastern depositors at the expense of the smaller state banks, farmers and the hard working common people. In addition, the bank’s president seemed to not be trustworthy. Therefore, Jackson vetoed the recharter bill that his opponent Henry Clay had renewed, and took the…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He only served for two terms, He didn’t believe in permanent political parties, and he only vetoed a bill when it questioned constitutionality. Jackson’s Economic Policy broke one of those warnings and enhanced the development of American democracy for generations to come. Jackson believed, and many of his supporters, that the bank was far too powerful. The bank served mainly to private investors, and not the common people. In 1832 when Henry Clay, one of Jackson's political enemies, proposed an early recharter of the Bank of the United Sates he hoped to get rid of Jackson's wealthy supporters if Jackson vetoed the recharter, and if he passed it then the common man would feel betrayed. Andrew Jackson, immediately vetoed the recharter once it passed through congress. His veto of the recharter bill…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Jackson believed the Second Bank of the United States was corrupt and took away from the people's power and money. He wanted to destroy the bank as soon as he was elected into office. Jackson's strategies to bring about the downfall of the bank were carefully thought out between him and his "Kitchen Cabinet", a group of close friends that gave Jackson advice throughout his presidency.Nicholas Biddle was the president of the Second Bank of the U.S. and Jackson's main adversary in the Bank War. At the young age of 37, Biddle was appointed president of the Second Bank of the U.S. Jackson felt that Biddle was young and inexperienced, and that the bank held too much power and it did not answer to a higher authority, giving it absolute control over the nation's money. Biddle stated that Jackson had no right to change the state of currency because he had no alternative. Jackson retaliated by stating that he would put in motion a reform program for the economy. But the court ruled that the bank was a constitutional institution.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Working Class DBQ Essay

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Document B: In the document, Jackson argues that the bank of the United States had to close down because only the wealthy were benefitting from it. The reason for that is that in 1832, Congress passed a bill to recharter the Bank of the United States, and that resulted into a campaign issue. Foreign people held over a fourth of the stocks, and the rest…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As President of the Bank of the United States, Nicholas Biddle viciously sparred with President Jackson over the function and power of the bank.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the government told the Indians to move, they said they would give them bigger land, money and support to move. “The Cherokee Nations cedes to the United States all the land claimed by said Nation east of the Mississippi River… 7,000,000 acres of land is guaranteed to the Cherokees west of the Mississippi” (source 5). The United States as well, “agreed that the land herein guaranteed to the Cherokees shall never, without their consent, be included within…any State or Territory” (source 5). As the Indians were getting ready to leave, the Americans took…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indian titles to their territory were terminated when this bill was made into a law. This allowed for the territory to be used, claimed, or obtained by the white settlers. Even though they were forced to leave, the policy stated that if they wanted it, then Indians had the option of their transportation to be paid for(Trail of Tears). President Jackson called for federal troops to cleanse the indians from the land that they had lived on for generations. This order went against the actual law that was passed by the government stating that the indians were allowed to trade their land for land in the west. This same law also stated that they could not be put out of their land by the government if they didn't choose to give up their land. However, President Jackson frequently ignored the laws and made his own decisions (A Brief History of the Trail of…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jacksonian Dbq

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Jacksonians had a strict interpretation of the constitution and wanted to follow it as much as they could. This is shown in Jackson’s veto of the national bank. Jackson thought that bank was unconstitutional and only made the rich richer. As he says in his veto message “I can perceive none of these modifications…to make it compatible with justice, with sound policy, or with the Constitution of our country”. Rich foreigners held most of the stock in the bank which hurt the country as he says “more than a fourth part of the stock is held by foreigners” making the bank unconstitutional. The Jacksonians were concerned with the common man and the constitution. The national bank only took from the common man and gave more to the rich.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    andrew jackson: tyrant

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson was who started the act that moved thousands of Indian families to Oklahoma. This displacement was what became known as the "Trail of Tears." The Natives were forced to walk across the country during the winter with nothing but clothes, where nearly 2000 Native Americans died. Jackson must have thought it was okay for him to evict them because of his thought to designate their own land to live on, even though the Native had so many advances in becoming civilized so they could be accepted by him and other citizens.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The great Cherokee Nation that had fought the young Andrew Jackson back in 1788 now faced an even more powerful and determined man who was intent on taking their land. But where in the past they had resorted to guns, tomahawks, and scalping knives, now they chose to challenge him in a court of law. They were not called a 'civilized nation' for nothing. Many of their leaders were well educated; many more could read and write; they had their own written language, thanks to Sequoyah, a constitution, schools, and their own newspaper. And they had adopted many skills of the white man to improve their living conditions. Why should they be expelled from their lands when they no longer threatened white settlements and could compete with them on many levels? They intended to fight their ouster, and they figured they had many ways to do it. As a last resort they planned to bring suit before the Supreme Court. Prior to that action, they sent a delegation to Washington to plead their cause. They petitioned Congress to protect them against the unjust laws of Georgia that had decreed that they were subject to its sovereignty and under its complete jurisdiction. They even approached the President, but he curtly informed them that there was nothing he could do in their quarrel with the state, a statement that shocked and amazed them.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays