The Real Shakespeare Conspiracy Essay

The Real Shakespearean Tragedy

The conspiracy surrounding William Shakespeare is too outrageous to be ignored. Shakespeare was a man that many people didn't really actually know unless they were in a play. why, It is a widely spread theory that ever since the death of Shakespeare in 1616, his authenticity, for the most part, has been questioned by great scholars, professors, and educators. Shakespeare was raised in a household at Stratford-Upon-Avon where writing was not a common thing. the Shakespeare family would sign official documents with a mark instead of a signature (davis 1). This signifies an indication of illiteracy according to researchers (shahon 1). Moreover, every recorded and known signature of Shakespeare is hardly eligible,
A man by the name of J.T Looney wrote a book called Shakespeare identified. oxford societies as well as great men such as Sigmund Freud are high believers in this conspiracy. It is said that hamlet actually contains many clues on the earl of Oxford authorship. It also said that the reason he couldn't publicly make it his is because it would have been seen as spiteful and treasonous, he was one of queen elizabeth's favorite, other say it could have branched out even more than that. The need to hide his authorship is a necessity if he actually
On one play the name was spelled “Shak-Speare”. Back then using hyphens meant a double meaning to the word (summer 2). there was also some that was not spelled the same as Shakespeare. Maybe the Shakespeare Shakespeare himself was not the only man behind his plays, simply a production studio, or stolen work as many believe
Hyphens, many of Shakespeare's works were signed off with a hyphenated name. they used that it can dictate that maybe Shakespeare works were constructed by different authors. Shakespeare could have been a huge underground corporation. It is said that the theory of an underground writing, production studio was not far fetched at all (Hechinger). This was a great and highly thought-out idea. The Queen of England used to fund Shakespeare's plays, but there is no proper evidence to her ever doing so directly, in reality it could have been sent to the supposed company(austin 1). Not a single note is written from Shakespeare Shakespeare. The word or name Shakespeare was not written on his plays at first (shahan). Shakespeare shied away from signing his plays. Was this simply a scared attempted to see if people would enjoy his works? Or is there more behind it. In observation this would be an outrageous thing to do since anybody would take credit for their work. There's a huge possibility he even stole these plays and ripped that front page off. (cumming