The Rattlesnake's Vengeance: A Comparative Analysis
Revenge is a popular word used profusely by individuals, and writers of all kind, each airing from different perspectives, and notions; apparently, revenge and its repercussions could be analyzed from the contents of these selected text, fable, and fairy tales –‘'The book of Genesis,'' ‘'Of the good advice,'' ‘'the man and the serpent,'' and ‘' the rattlesnake's vengeance''; However, Revenge could be abstruse to delve into, specifically from the context of Genesis. Alternatively, Revenge could be referred as pay-back, retribution, retaliation, or vengeance, which is a harmful action against a person, or group in response to a grievance, be it real or perceived (Wikipedia). From the angle of Genesis, Vengeance (Revenge) and Avenge had played
…show more content…
On the fragment, ''Of the good advice'', retaliation had been utterly unveiled. A certain knight, christened Zedechias, who had conceived his fortune from his subtle friend, serpent; He(Zedechias) had married an injudicious wife who had fooled him out of greed to subvert his subtle friend(serpent) to uphold supremacy, because she taught that serpent had enough wealth to acquire. Advertently, the foolish Knight, zedechias embarked on the mission to a slain serpent, but out constriction, the serpent escaped the attempt. Consequently, the serpent in rage, retracted his (Zedechias) purported wealth, and strike his handsome …show more content…
A great, and renowned hunter had tied a nuptial flight with a meticulous woman, who had taken care of her kids to the climax. Out of her fussy and brave nature, she killed a rattlesnake that invaded the kids in the field, not knowing its repercussions; However, other rattlesnakes on the same confraternity conspired; with the aid of her husband, and killed her, just to retaliate.
Seemingly, the fable of Aesop, ‘'The Man and the Serpent'' portrays reprisal. Unwittingly, a countryman's son had trampled upon a serpent; eventually, got bitten to death. Out of grievance, the Father (countryman) bided to kill the serpent to avenge his son but, succeeded cutting off the tail. In retrospect, the serpent retributed, and killed countryman's fleets of cattle, which left him in anguish, and nearly unrepairable
On the fragment, ''Of the good advice'', retaliation had been utterly unveiled. A certain knight, christened Zedechias, who had conceived his fortune from his subtle friend, serpent; He(Zedechias) had married an injudicious wife who had fooled him out of greed to subvert his subtle friend(serpent) to uphold supremacy, because she taught that serpent had enough wealth to acquire. Advertently, the foolish Knight, zedechias embarked on the mission to a slain serpent, but out constriction, the serpent escaped the attempt. Consequently, the serpent in rage, retracted his (Zedechias) purported wealth, and strike his handsome …show more content…
A great, and renowned hunter had tied a nuptial flight with a meticulous woman, who had taken care of her kids to the climax. Out of her fussy and brave nature, she killed a rattlesnake that invaded the kids in the field, not knowing its repercussions; However, other rattlesnakes on the same confraternity conspired; with the aid of her husband, and killed her, just to retaliate.
Seemingly, the fable of Aesop, ‘'The Man and the Serpent'' portrays reprisal. Unwittingly, a countryman's son had trampled upon a serpent; eventually, got bitten to death. Out of grievance, the Father (countryman) bided to kill the serpent to avenge his son but, succeeded cutting off the tail. In retrospect, the serpent retributed, and killed countryman's fleets of cattle, which left him in anguish, and nearly unrepairable