Preview

The Purpose and Intent of The Wrongs Act 1958

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2838 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Purpose and Intent of The Wrongs Act 1958
1. The purpose and intent of The Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) as it relates to torts

The Wrong Act 1958 is a law most closely related to people 's daily life, that means it is a legislation dedicated to set lawful regulation when someone in Victoria suffers from injuries of kind, he or she shall be lawfully compensated for his injury that may related to financial losses. After hundreds of years of development, Anglo-American tort law has formed a very sound legal system with negligent torts occupies a very important position in Anglo-American tort law. Negligence infringement is the core areas of The Wrong Act 1958 as well as the main forms of infringement. Negligence tort is a risky action causing unreasonable harm to other people. It is generally believed that causes of action of a negligence including four constituent elements: the existence of obligations, the breach action, causation and damages1. The last element means, in the absence of actual damages in a case, the plaintiff can not ask compensation for nominal damages to maintain its legal right against the risk of negligence of others. Negligence tort action requires a precondition of some kind of actual damage. In defining whether an act constitutes negligence, in addition to actual damage, there should have one more condition: the perpetrator has duty of care2. Only when a perpetrator has a duty of care, and the perpetrator 's behavior does not meet the required standards of conduct and breaching the obligation, negligence is constituted. The perpetrator will then be responsible for respective party. It is clear that duty of care research is necessary in negligence cases. Modern negligence tort law was originated in the early 19th century. However, common law has officially formed concept of negligence until 1932 in the United Kingdom after Donoghue V. Stevenson case. The duty of care principle was also proposed at that time. Judge Atkin used to say in Donoghue V .Stevenson case,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Shaw V Thomas

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    11.45 Section 48(3) of the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) attempts to give some guidance on the meaning of…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Case Study

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages

     Duty of care As, for the first time, demonstrated in the case of Donoghue v Stevenson , negligence may exist despite there being no direct relationship between two parties. After the Shaddock’s Case , the duty of care was extended to include the giving of information. In general, defendant will owe the plaintiff a duty of care if, at the time of making the statement, the defendant knows that:…

    • 2752 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Breakdown of Elements

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages

    2. Negligence is the failure of an ordinary, reasonable, and prudent person to exercise due care, resulting in harm or injury to the plaintiff. Negligence torts do not require intent. Negligence is conduct that falls below the level necessary to protect others against unreasonable risks of harm. To determine if someone should be found liable for a negligence tort, a reasonable person standard is used. If the defendant 's behavior is found to be less careful than behavior a reasonable person would exhibit, that defendant can be found liable for damages.…

    • 3166 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is defined as “the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation; any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) …

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence is a particular type of tort action that involves something the law calls a "duty of care." The standard of care depends on the facts and circumstances of the case but, generally, the duty of care, in its broadest sense, means each of us should behave responsibly and sensibly, in the way a reasonable person would behave.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gng4170 Lecture Notes

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages

    EXAM PREVIEW!!! – Negligence hypothetical question – Given the facts of a case, describe all relevant material covered in the notes, give legal justification and plausible decision.…

    • 4235 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    irac- negligence

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Week 2 Negligence Negligence Negligence is defined as persons or business’s actions that make them liable to foreseeable consequences of their actions. There are certain steps that the plaintiff needs to prove negligence on the defendant’s behalf. These elements are duty of care, breach of this duty of care, plaintiff suffered injury, defendant caused the injury, and it was the proximate cause for the plaintiffs’ injury (Cheeseman, 2013).…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Torts Notes

    • 3647 Words
    • 15 Pages

    * INTRODUCED Civil Law (Wrongs Act 2002). Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) Personal Injury (Liabilities and damages) NT.…

    • 3647 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Purnell, John, ‘Tort does not pay: a guide to exemplary damages’, (2003) 58 Plaintiff 25…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Negligence is when somebody has a duty of care and that duty is breached. Negligence is split into 3 parts.…

    • 2419 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Issue: Has negligence been demonstrated? Rule According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence- Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) According to the Wrong Act 1958 (Vic) s48, an individual has acted negligently when its conduct has caused harm and the person has not had precaution against any risk.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Negligence is defined as the failure to exercise reasonable care to avoid injuring others or the property belonging to others. This would be if somebody does not exercise the amount of care that a reasonable careful person would use under the circumstances or somebody does something that a reasonably careful person would not do under the circumstances. Fault is essential in a negligence tort and is determined by basic elements. In negligence action there are four elements that play a large determining role. The four elements include duty of care, breach of duty by the tortfeasor, causation of injury to the victim and damages to the victim. The elements of negligence action work together in tort law to determine the level of negligence of the tortfeasor. The first element is the legal duty to conform to a certain standard of conduct in order to protect other from unreasonable risk of harm. The second element is the breach of duty by the tortfeasor failing to conform to a certain standard of conduct. The third element is the causation of injury and establishing a casual connection between the conduct and the injury, which comes in two components, actual cause or proximate cause. The final element of negligence action is damages to the victim being actual damages. This element is proving that a monetary figure can be attached to the negligence claim. The damages can come as compensatory damage, punitive damages, or damages attributable to actual loss of physical property. With all these elements in place fault is irrelevant.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B law

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Executive Summary This report is going to analyse the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) and torts in Australia. The Wrong Act 1958(Vic) is one of the most important proposed law in Victoria, It has been amendment in 2002 and 2003. The aim of the wrong Act was to legislate for wrongs against a person, Torts is an important part in The Wrong Act. This assignment will presentation in three parts.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays