Preview

The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
151 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of The US Invasion
While most Americans call the war the, “American-Mexican War”, the other side would call it, “The U.S. Invasion”. If it is God’s reasoning to expand the U.S. territory as far as possible, then is it also his reasoning to murder those upon their own land? It is not only unjustified to take the land from the Mexicans, however to become inhuman enough to kill those while doing so is unspeakable. There was no need for any more conflict at that time, so to start a war was not ideal for anyone. Would a war be more beneficial or cost efficient than a compromise or a buyout? The Mexicans had only simple ideas of allowing outsiders into their land to increase population. In the words of General Francisco Mejia, “The right of conquest has always been

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter three of “Occupied America, A History of Chicanos,” Acuna explains the cause of the war between Mexico and North America. Eugene C. Barker states that the immediate cause of the war was “the overthrow of the nominal republic by Santa Anna and the substitution of centralized oligarchy” which allegedly would have centralized Mexican control (Acuna 39). Texas history is a mixture of selected fact and generalized myth. The expansion and capitalist development moved together. The two Mexican wars gave U.S. commerce, industry, mining, agriculture, and stock rising. The truth is that the Pacific Coast belonged to the commercial empire that the United States was already building in that ocean. In the Polk-Stockton Intrigue, Americans found it rather more difficult than other people to deal rationally with their wars. Many Anglo-American historians attempted to dismiss it simply as a “bad war”, which took place during the era of Manifest Destiny. Most studies on the war dwell on the causes and results of the war, and dealing with war strategy. The attitude of Mexicans toward Anglo-Americans was obviously influenced by the war and vice-versa. In the end, by late 1847 the war was almost at an end. Scott’s defeat of Santa Anna in a hard fought battle at Churubusco…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Synthesis Essay

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Manifest Destiny, or land stealing? The war against mexico and the us, which took place north of the Rio Grande, broke out May 1846. The land north of the Rio Grande was disputed by the US and Mexico. Because the United States decided to occupy disputed territory Mexico attacked. With that said, is the United States justified in declaring war against Mexico? The United States was not justified in going to war because they deprived Mexico from their land, occupying territory in dispute and it was mexico's territory.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was Mexico justified to go to war with the United States? This essay argues the US was justified because Mexico invaded US territory, Mexician territories needed a new government, and Mexican territories didn´t respect the US reconciliation. Mexico invaded the United States terrirory. The quote that supports this is,”Mexico has passed the boundry of the United States… has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon the American soil. ”(Polk).…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    American War Dbq

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page

    The United States was unjustified when going to war with Mexico for multiple reasons. One of the biggest reasons was the expansion of a slavery state. Texas is very large and great for growing cotton, so if the U.S. annexed Texas, a very large slave state would be added. The second reason was that James Polk provoked the war. He was also a big believer in Manifest Destiny. This meant that he wanted to expand the land of the U.S. , and His motto was “54 40 or fight” which meant expanding the U.S. up to the northern boundary of the Oregon territory. If this goal was not achieved, they would go to war to get it.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page

    September 11 2001, marked a very tragic day in history, and immediate action was required in order to handle the situation. During the Bush administration, surveillance programs were put into place in order to monitor possible hostile actions towards our country. In a post Snowden article in 2006, Robert A. Levy went into depth about what Article II is and if current programs put into place can be deemed illegal. After reviewing Article II and Levy’s position I agree that it was illegal, but I believe that this was because what need to take place was described vaguely and was left up to interpretation. The fourth amendment speaks about using “reasonableness,” what might be reasonable to one may not mean the same to another. Due to this, abuse…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9/11 Pros And Cons

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “We might have accomplished something if we have been able to treat the terrorist attacks of 9/11 in a way similar to how we treat the damage on the nation's highways-by implementing practices and requirements that are directly related to results (as in the case of speed limit, safety belts, and the like, which took decades to accomplish in the cause of auto safety)-rather than by throwing the nation into a near panic and using the resulting fears to justify expensive but not necessarily effective or even relevant measures.”…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It was plainly our duty to extend our protection over her citizens and soil,” said President Polk (doc B). When troops arrived at the Rio Del Norte, Mexican troops attacked the Americans, killing and wounding sixteen soldiers. (Hook) This was the deciding factor of America going to war with Mexico. “When word arrived on May 9, 1846, that Mexicans soldiers had fired upon Americans on the “Texas side” of the Rio Grande, president Polk had a reason for going to war.” (BG essay) You see, if Mexico hadn’t engaged in violence first there would be no immediate reason for the U.S. to go to war with…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has been at war since its creation in 1776. It has battled confrontation 222 out of 239 years, just about 93% of its continuance. Notably, one of the most crucial wars is the “War on Terror”. Beginning in March of 2003, this war initially served the purpose of getting rid of the country’s leader Saddam Hussein to prevent his use of suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. While this war was strategically justified the real war between Iraq and the U.S. began long before what is officially recognized. The United States of America should not have invaded Iraq as it promoted the illegal exercise of government power and democracy, encouraged continuous genocide and violence, and empowered an extreme capitalist regime.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mexico Dbq Analysis

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The U.S had a clear and valid reason on why they needed to move into Mexico. Mexico, essentially, invited Americans to live in the province of Texas, which turned out to be a bad idea in the end. So, was the United States justified in going to war with Mexico? The answer to that question would be yes, the U.S was justified in going to war with Mexico because their population was overgrowing and they needed more land, their economic depressions made people want to live in frontier areas, and living in frontier areas would create many new opportunities for commerce and self-advancement.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mexican-American war stared in 1821 after Mexico won its independence from Spain, thus allowing American settlers to move into the newly unoccupied territory. The Victorians of the war, were the Americans. After the war came to an end, Mexico signed the treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo. In the treaty Mexico agreed to give 500,000mi to the U.S., while the united states paid Mexico $15 million. There are many different point of views towards the Mexican-American war. The United states was not justified by going to war with Mexico because, they fought for what belonged to Mexico in the first place. And they used the belief of Manifest Destiny to overspread our country ignorantly.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our heroes are out there fighting for America. But exactly what are they fighting for, because it seems like our own government is hiding information from us. They say that it’s to protect us. Is it really? A government that we call one of our own and one that we trust has deceived us. For the families who are losing their sons, daughters, mothers, and fathers, etc.,who are in the war, are just told that they should be proud of their protector protecting the United States of America. After the soldiers die, the only remembrance of the fallen is the burial. Only families remember their deaths while the government moves on with their business and they say that they care for our people. To me the United States should have never gone to war with…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    WASHINGTON—With the United States facing a daunting array of problems at home and abroad, leading historians courteously reminded the nation Thursday that when making tough choices, it never hurts to stop a moment, take a look at similar situations from the past, and then think about whether the decisions people made back then were good or bad.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    proclaims western beliefs and medicine superior to Liberian culture. This again feeds into the issue of lack of trust: and trust between those giving and receiving aid is a significantly large issues because it keeps the provision of aid and communication network efficient. Without trust humanitarian work cannot suffice.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From this evidence, it is clear that the Mexican-American war was not justified. America invaded Mexico, they just wanted America’s land, and they didn’t respect Mexico. Even though some believe that it was unnecessary and uncalled for, some also believe that it was necessary. The disagreement with wars has been a problem many times in history and today. Many Americans opposed the American Revolution. The entry into World War I was deeply debated. The participation in Vietnam and Korea was also…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Illegal immigration is the movement of people toward national borders in a manner that breaks the immigration codes of the destination country. In other words, illegal immigration is the action of staying in a region in a country without any permission from government. According to Demetrios the director of the immigration policy foundation (2005), in “ Illegal Immigration,” that the universal fight with illegal immigration has no end. Seminara (2007) writes in his article “Migration,” that half of millions foreigner in the USA came legally with acceptable visas. However, the ministry of homeland security infers that the range of the illegal population of USA is from 27 to 57 percent. In fact, legal immigration including coming into a country with a green card or a visa. As a result, such unlawful entrance is crime and if…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays