Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
74 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons
A nuclear weapon is a weapon that gets it’s destructive power by turning matter into energy. All nuclear weapons are explosives(usually missiles).They can be transported by missiles, bombs,tank shells,mines, or torpedoes. The most destructive nuclear weapons are far more poweful than any conventional(non nuclear) weapon. A nuclear weapon used in a large city could kill millions of people. A large nuclear war could devastate the Earth’s climate and ability to support life(a.k.a nuclear winter).
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs

    The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Mass Destruction Of Nuclear Weapons
    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: Mass Destruction Of Nuclear Weapons

    First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nuclear Energy Pros And Cons
    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Nuclear Energy Pros And Cons

    Nuclear energy is one of the hottest topics in the fight to a cleaner world. The number of people who believe that nuclear energy is too dangerous and unhealthy for the earth has skyrocketed because of the nuclear accidents that have happened in the past and recently. These protesters may have a lot of evidence and theories about how bad this type of energy can be, but the people who have realized that nuclear energy is the way to a cleaner and more “Green” society have proof and facts that overrule anything that the protesters say.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power
    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power

    Nuclear power is produced through the use of nuclear reactions to produce nuclear energy that can then be harnessed to generate heat and create superheated steam to drive turbines. The most common nuclear reaction is that of nuclear fission, which is the splitting of an atom’s nucleus into smaller nuclei. Nuclear reactions are incredibly energy dense and thus allow nuclear reactors to make a tremendous amount of electricity. There are only 61 nuclear power plants in the United States, but they account for 19 percent of the entire country’s electricity production. [8][14] There are 7,304 total power plants in the United States, so nuclear plants on average produce over twenty-eight times as much energy as another plant in the U.S.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    The United States decided to use atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. This bombing created devastation and death that the world had never seen before. The use of the atomic bombs has been a topic of intense debate for years following the bombing. Several reasons for such outcry pertaining to the use of the atomic bomb were the moral dilemmas behind the bombing, the mass destruction caused by the bombing, the horrible physical and emotional effects on the citizens of Japan, and strained relations between America and Japan.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Nuclear Weapons
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Arguments Against Nuclear Weapons

    Albert Einstein once said, “The explosive force of nuclear fission has changed everything except our modes of thinking and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe. We shall require an entirely new pattern of thinking if humankind is to survive” Albert Einstein, 1946. Nuclear weapons are arguably the most feared weapon ever created. They have the capability to end wars, nations, and even our planet if we are not careful. So, how serious is the threat of a terrorist cell acquiring a nuclear weapon and using it in an attack? Any statement containing the words ‘nuclear and weapon’ must almost always be considered serious but what is the likelihood of a successful nuclear terrorist attack occurring? The answer is anything but straight forward and many different avenues must be explored in order to better understand this current threat.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Weapons Persuasive Essay
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Atomic Weapons Persuasive Essay

    The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs
    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombs

    “Science has taught us how to put the atom to work. But to make it work for good instead of for evil lies in the domain dealing with the principals of human duty. We are now facing a problem more of ethics than physics.” - Bernard M Baruch. There were two atomic bombs that were dropped during World War II. There were few survivors after the atomic bombs were dropped. Both of the atom bombs had nicknames. They were dropped three days apart from each other. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. The second was dropped on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs are what ended the war.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons
    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons

    The atomic bomb dropped on Japan was the correlated decision of the president at the time, Harry Truman, and his chief advisors. While the pros and cons were weighed heavily, it was decided that the least blood shed would be wrought if we shed the most blood on the first strike. On August 6, 1945, the enola gay, a class B-29 heavy bomber, departed from Tinian, an island to the southeast of Japan, carrying a heavy payload which would effectively be the beginning of the end of Japan’s war against the United States. The payload at hand would be called “Little boy”, a Uranium comprised atomic bomb created for the simple purpose of mass destruction. The target of this weapon would be a bridge formed at a junction between two rivers in the downtown…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros Of Constructing An Atomic Bomb
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros Of Constructing An Atomic Bomb

    In August of 1939, President F. D. Roosevelt was made aware of the possibility that German scientists were racing to construct an atomic bomb. He was also warned that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon. Roosevelt, in response to this set up the Advisory Committee on Uranium, which consisted of both military and civilian representatives. In order to reach their own advancements in the nuclear field faster than Germany they were to study the current state of research on uranium and to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. At Columbia University a limited military funding for isotope separation and the work on chain reactions were performed by Enrico Fermi and Leo…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    I. Manhatten Project (C)before German & Japanese, Pearl Harbor opportunity, Japan already defeat, Hiroshima (70,000), Nagasaki (40,000), “complete destruction” “utter destruction”…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb
    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bomb

    Weapons of all kinds have been used by humanity in wars, sometimes to instigate, and sometimes to make the best of a bad situation. In the case of the atomic bomb there has been a great deal of opposition to it: that it is not necessary to end the war and there are better alternatives to it. In actuality, the atomic is necessary to end the war, and it is not as “evil” as a weapon in war, as many seem to think. It will make the Japanese surrender without engaging in a more harmful and devastating invasion, it is not particularly unique in the amount damage it can cause, and it will stop the Japanese empire, which is belittling and destroying other populations in Asia.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bombs Pros And Cons
    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Atomic Bombs Pros And Cons

    I have been told by many scientists and other leaders that this weapon will be the cause of many hundred’s of deaths and I am well aware of the outcomes that could happen, but my country always comes first. We have offered the Japanese government multiple opportunities to surrender including the Potsdam declaration which they never responded to, and as they keep denying these opportunities, in return, they sacrifice Japanese lives. The number of casualties would certainly be equal or possibly more if I had decided against the nuclear weapons in the long…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing
    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombing

    Numerous countries today such as Russia, North Korea, and Pakistan continue to develop and test nuclear weapons. This race to develop nuclear weapons was started by the United States near the end of World War II. The U.S. used nuclear weapons in World War II to make the Japanese surrender. The Japanese surrendered five days after the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed. Whether this bombing was justified is still debated today.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Chemical Weapons
    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Chemical Weapons

    Natural, substance and other non-atomic dangers, for example, digital and automaton assaults, constitute a class of weapons that may not bring about as much mass physical annihilation as atomic weapons can, yet can bring about critical mass impacts on, and/or mass disturbances to, a focused on people. Weapons specialists still verbal confrontation whether these non-atomic weapons can genuinely be considered weapons of mass decimation; then again, certain sorts of natural weapons, for example, weaponized smallpox or Bacillus anthracis, could on a basic level damage a great many individuals relying upon the situation and the degree of the populace's introduction to the organic weapons. Substance weapons under all circumstances would not bring…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics