Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court
As we know in the Article III of the U.S constitution says that all judges in the Supreme Court and Inferior Courts can have their jobs for the rest of their life. The reasons that the judges can lose their job is by retirement or if they have been accused of any crime.
The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices
    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Life Tenure

    Because the life tenure for a Supreme Court Justice will protect them from making biased or “polarised” decisions, the life tenure should remain as it has been for over two hundred years. Just in the past year, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito, who are all more conservative, have all voted on certain cases with more liberal justices. Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn, who have researched the decisions of justices, have discovered that several justices change their opinions over time, something that wouldn’t happen so…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons

    Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona
    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona

    According to the judicial selection website, Pennsylvania does not use the Judicial Nominating Commissions as their method to selecting a justice to serve on the bench (www.judicialselctions.us). The justices run for election to gain a seat in the courts. They do this by campaigning and getting the necessary funds from donations and their political party. Elections in the state are held in odd numbered years. Once a justice is elected they can serve an unlimited amount of terms until the mandatory retirement age of seventy and are retained or re-elected by voters. Appellate Courts and Courts of Common Pleas judges serve ten year terms. All other court justices such as, Magisterial District and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist #51 Analysis

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist #51 Analysis

    It is far less important for the judicial branch to maintain a separate “will” due to the fact that their sole responsibility is to approve or decline, in other words justify, the decisions laid before them by the latter two branches of government. It is the responsibility of the judicial branch to determine if the ideas put forth by the other two branches are maintaining compliance with the U.S. Constitution. Since federal judges are appointed for life, the president who has appointed them or the senators whose consent the president will seek will not influence their decision-making.…

    • 737 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Federal Judges Vs Supreme Court Justices
    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Federal Judges Vs Supreme Court Justices

    The Supreme Court Justices sit at the highest level of the court system and oversee and manage the entire federal court system. Once nominated, the Senate approves or disapproves the presidential nominee. A big difference between Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices is that outside groups such as political parties, interest groups, the media and the general public bend the ear of the Senators to get people elected that can help their agendas and side with the president’s goals. If selected they can serve for life, as long as they do not have any derogatory issues that would lead them to resign or be impeached (Lenz, Timothy O., and Mirya Holman, 2013). The appointment process involves the more media compared to the…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Philosophies Of Justices In The United States
    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judicial Philosophies Of Justices In The United States

    The judicial philosophies of the justices in the United States Supreme Court differ from one another. These philosophies are depended on the justices personal experiences and ideologies they grew up with. We find some are on the liberal side, some are conservative, while others are more on the moderate side. The liberal judges believe that the U.S constitution is a living document. This means that the Constitution should be open to modification and modernization according to the demands of contemporary times. They believe that there are certain rules and restrictions that are outdated and should be revised. The conservative judges on the other hand, strictly believe that the meaning of the Constitution was fixed by the founding fathers of the U.S…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)
    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Judges, are they politicians in disguise? (40)

    The role of the Supreme Court is to interpret the constitution and to apply these interpretations to legislation that has been made by Congress as to avoid them from making unconstitutional law. In doing so this is called judicial review in which the Supreme Court takes an active role in intervening in politics. If a law is suggested as being unconstitutional the Supreme Court will either accept or decline and if they accept, this will result in the judiciary then looking at the case and determining whether or not the accusation is true or if the question is entitled to make a claim. In some instances this can be taken too far by the court and they can intervene and end up making a substantial decision on some very controversial issues which would be deemed as unfair by one of the parties, other times their intervention is adequate and justified. I will argue that they are not politically neutral due to the appointment process; however I think they are less like politicians in disguise and more just actively doing their job and interpreting the constitution as how it is supposed to be.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Contrasts and Comparisons Between State and Federal Court Systems
    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Contrasts and Comparisons Between State and Federal Court Systems

    U.S. District Courts, U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal, and the U.S. Supreme Court are all one type of federal court, but unlike other courts, these courts are not courts of general jurisdiction and all judges of these courts are appointed by the President of the United States with the advice and consent of the Senate and hold office for life. The second type of federal court which is established by Congress is magistrate courts, bankruptcy courts, U.S. Court of Military Appeals, U.S. Tax Court and the U.S. Court of Veteran’s Appeals. The President of the United States also appoints the judges of these courts with the advice and consent of the Senate. Judges of the second type of courts usually serve for a set number of years unlike the judges of the first type which could feasibly serve for life.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Should Supreme Court Justices be Granted Life Tenure?
    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Should Supreme Court Justices be Granted Life Tenure?

    In chapter four of Our Undemocratic Constitution, Sanford Levingson addresses the idea of life tenure for judges. He asserts that the good behavior clause in Article iii of the constitution is not clearly spelled out and is therefore subject to interpretation. Levingston reasons that in spite of judges' terms of service, they "cannot be removed from office for partisan political reasons [;] so long as the judges behavior is within the range viewed as good, that is uncorrupted… then they are protected against losing their positions" (Levingson, p.126). Though he accepts that life tenure has been established as a common good in the past, he feels that the interpretation of the clause ought to be updated. Levingson claims life tenure for Supreme Court justices "is an idea whose time has passed, and it offers a good reason for any concerned citizen… to be dissatisfied with the constitution" (Levingson, p.126).…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Judicial Selection
    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Judicial Selection

    In recent years judicial selection has become an issue of great debate with many different views and ways to make it better. In Texas, judicial selection is carried out by partisan elections where voters get to choose the judges and justices. This form of judicial selection has many advantages as well as some disadvantages.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of US Supreme Court Justices
    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of US Supreme Court Justices

    Another concern of the current situation is that the judges are serving much longer than their minds would normally allow, seeing as how some judges are serving well into their eighties. “The history of the Court is replete with repeated instances of Justices casting decisive votes or otherwise participating actively in the Court’s work when their colleagues and/or families had serious doubts about their mental capacities” (Garrow, David). And during the twentieth century the problem has multiplied. How are judges to base constitutional decisions rationally when their minds may not be so rational? Chief Justice Rehnquist continued to serve in office (for nineteen years) while regularly abusing the drug Placidyl. Justice William O. Douglas continued to serve on the court even after suffering from a stroke and many had questioned his capabilities. So to eradicate the life long tenure would surely eliminate the problem of judicial senility and possible…

    • 1422 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper
    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Independent Judicial Branch
    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Independent Judicial Branch

    They are appointed by the president and gets to serve for life. People would want to chose who there own supreme court justices are. In addition, they can serve there whole life for unlimited years meaning they potitionaly could become lazy in there duties and corrupt. On the other hand, when they are appointed judges it goes thought congress to make sure the person is politicly right for the job. If they do not do a fair job with good behavior they can be impeached and hold accountable for there actions. Finally they will have more wisdom and experience with being a judge because they are running for life. The judicial branch lays a major part of our national government, security and rights of our…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics