The Pros And Cons Of Jim Crow Laws

Jim Crow was a pre-civil war character in a minstrel show, A white man was made up as a black man by make-up, an incorporated character called Jim Crow, in 1832. Soon the term Jim Crow became on euphemism for “Negro” and the term Jim Crow Laws became a euphemism for legal segregation. Jim Crow was not just a set of anti-black segregation laws though but was a way of life. It was a racial hate system that ran mainly in southern states of America in between 1877 and the middle of the 1960's. Jim Crow portrayed the legitimization of black hatred. The highly intelligent as well as the poor white community saw black people intellectually and culturally inferior to themselves, all societies of white people including Christian ministers, supported
He was trailed and his lawyer augured that u cannot have the right to label one citizen as white and one as black for the purposes of restricting rights and privileges. The court upheld the law saying that racial segregation did not mean there was no equality. The Plessy case proved that there was a segregation, with white being an advantage and black being a disadvantage. It sent the message to Southern states that discrimination against blacks is acceptable. Jim Crow laws were the basis of violence and crime. Any Black person that violated the law, e.g. Sat in the white side of a bar, risked their homes, job and even lives, it also put their family in danger. White people where allowed to beat black people and there were no consequences because the police, prosecutors, judges, juries and prison officers were all white, this gave a method of social control. The most extreme forms of Jim Crow violence were lynchings. Lynchings are extreme, even sadistic forms of violence performed in public, these violent acts were performed on black men and women and included, burning at the stake, beaten to death, hung, shot, castrated or