Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1195 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Gun Control
When John Hinckley, Jr. attempted the assassination of then President Ronald Reagan, his ability to purchase and utilize a hand gun even though he suffered from demonstrable mental illness was the impetus for the creation of the Brady Bill, more formally known as the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act. This Act is named after James Brady, former Assistant to the President and White House Press Secretary who was shot in the assassination attempt and suffered irreparable brain damage, the Act sought to place controls on guns, including background checks for the acquisition of handguns. The Act prevented the sale of firearms through dealers by convicted felons, those with mental defects, and those who are fugitives of justice. Supports maintained …show more content…
In fact, individuals seek support of police and criminal justice agencies to resolve matters that would be resolved in the past using individual weaponry. Opponents of gun control argue that these rights are essential. Advocates of gun control have argued that there is a definitive need for greater management of access to guns, while those opposed to gun control often cite the Second Amendment as the underlying principle for maintaining …show more content…
Because these measures are at the discretion of police and because they can unfairly target ethnic minorities, consideration for the public views of this process should be considered when proposing these measures in the community setting. The outcomes of this study should be utilized to inform practices in the criminal justice setting, including evaluation of the criteria used by police for stop-and-frisk procedures and the issue of racial and ethnic disparities in the application of these methods for reducing gun violence in a multicultural society. The research provided can be utilized to support improved systems for monitoring the behaviors of police using stop-and-frisk procedures used by urban police officers and could also address some of the questions regarding the use of these techniques in specific neighborhoods or in the presence of socioeconomic disparities. This will help to provide a foundation for this kind of approach to reducing guns in community settings and could enhance the police operations for reducing gun

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Strict Gun Control (SGC) is defined as a “collection of legally authorized limitations designed to impose firearm shortage on the general residents” (Lance K). In the USA everyone has right to own anything or right to purchase whatever they want. In the same way people are purchasing the guns for different views. Some of them are purchasing to protect themselves and also they think that they have right to own it. Whereas, the others believe that they earn money by harming or blacking others. The best example is the death of an international student Sai Kiran Goud .On June 15, 2015 this 21 year male, doing his masters at the university in Miami was apparently waylaid by a group of suspected robbers. As he refused to give his iPhone he was killed…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A June 2013, reports of the Institute of Medicine claim that "most all firearms utilized as a part of criminal acts enter dissemination by means of starting legitimate exchange. “Somewhere around 2005 and 2010, 1.4 million firearms were stolen from US homes amid property violations, a yearly normal of 232,400.Ian Ayres, JD, PhD, and John J. Donohue, JD, PhD, Educators of Law at Yale Graduate school and Stanford Graduate school separately, state, "with weapons being an item that can be effortlessly diverted and rapidly sold at a moderately high portion of the underlying cost, the nearness of more firearms can really serve as a boost to robbery and burglary. Regardless of the fact that the firearm proprietor had a grant to convey a covered weapon…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Various thoughts on gun regulation have been recommended to the press, local government, and people in power at the federal level. Most of which are quickly rejected as they are expected to fail or are unable to make it through Congress due to inside politics. An idea that has not yet been pushed through Congress is allowing all responsible citizens to carry firearms with the potential consequence of a minimum five year prison sentence along with fines if the weapon is not used by the carrier in a situation of self-defense. With those laws in place, criminals may consider alternatives before violating their next victim with a firearm. This will also help to cut down on straw-purchases of firearms.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the stop-and-frisk may seem like a great procedure and that it may keep the streets safer, there are downfalls to it. The policy was created to keep guns off the street and drop crime rates throughout the cities; however it has often been rumored to be unreasonably racist, and target only the minorities. Furthermore, saying it has made streets safer is debatable, and if it has is it at the expense of another person’s rights? According to NYPD data reports in 2011 684,330 stops were conducted in New York, which is an increase by 524,873 since the year 2003 and they have only found an addition 176 guns per year. With those numbers, one would hope that the number of additional weapons obtained would be significantly higher.…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As far as banning certain types of guns, that statement was made out of pure ignorance. Mills has written things like, “It is a moral outrage and national disgrace that civilians can legally purchase weapons designed to kill people with brutal speed and efficiency.” First off if you’re going to talk about guns, know a little something about them. There are people like Mills who want to ban “assault weapons” because they believe that they are uniquely dangerous firearms that are equal to the destruction of a machine gun. False! The assault weapons that are available to civilians are like another semi-automatic weapon, they fire one bullet with one pull of the trigger. They’re not stronger, faster or anything else, what sets them apart is the…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If I was provided the authority to reduce gun violence I would make it an appoint to make everyone who were trying to purchase a gun complete a background check. This way you have a track record of the person who’s attempting to purchase some of the most dangerous weapons. I would also make sure anyone who is suffering from mental illness also become flagged in my background system. Make sure that all gun stores and licensed weapons are passed on to law enforcement when lost or stolen. These mass shooting are occurring mainly due to mental illnesses of the deranged suspects. People who were war veterans and came home mentally ill and unstable have snapped. These type of individuals have easy access to dangerous weapons.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Smith is a 15 year old student. He comes home from school and finds the police are at his house. The police then tell him that his mother has been shot and killed. The heartache, the grief, and the horror that goes through him as he hears this is unbearable. Smith’s pain could have been prevented with a gun. According to polled felons, 3/5 of them won’t target an armed victim. That means three out of five crimes could have been stopped if only the victim had a gun. Altering the gun laws we have now would make it so that more lives would be lost and would also be unconstitutional. That is why we must not alter the gun laws we have now.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issues that I am addressing is that stricter guns control will make the American citizen less safe. First of all, stricter gun control could attacking the 2nd amendment of the constitution of their right to bear arms and to defend themselves. My stance on this issues is that trickster can control can put people’s lives in harm’s way and won’t be able to defend themselves in case of robberies, and other criminal activities.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we look at gun-related events, such as a school shooting, or a massacre, our first knee-jerk reaction is to immediately blame guns for the crime. Stricter laws will surely stop those law-breaking criminals, right? As if the time of the writing of the article from procon.org, 49 out of the 62 mass shootings were done with legal guns. At least, that's one less crime committed, right? Would leaving ourselves defenseless while criminals acquire guns illegally instead be a better method protection? My partner and I believe that stricter gun control laws should not be passed, due to the fact that the Constitution protects the right to own guns, criminals who commit crimes with guns would likely not mind breaking another law to acquire said gun,…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those against gun control believe in these private protections. The Framers weren't able to predict everything the future would hold including the rapid growth in crime and violence. James Madison, who wrote the Constitution believed in the freedom and liberty of the individual, he discusses the advantages the private individual in America contained at the time with the right to bear arms compared to the many individuals of the nations in Europe. With the increase in violence and crime within the United States today the beliefs of James Madison and the framers become even stronger. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the court recognizes that the government can regulate gun rights but that the Second Amendment does establish an individual right to bear arms. The Court said its decision should not be interpreted to question the right of government to: prohibit felons and the mentally ill from owning weapons, prohibit guns in schools or public buildings, ban certain categories of guns not commonly used for self-defense, and to establish certain other conditions on gun ownership. Thus, the Washington D.C. gun ban was overturned just as many other cities have done since then. If we eliminate this right to bear arms then we…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many Americans believe that Gun-Control Laws should be enforced, because “Individuals do not need guns for protection; it is the role of local and federal government to protect the people through law enforcement agencies and the military.” (http://www.StudentNewsDaily.com) All Individuals deserve the right to carry a gun with them at all times, to use for protection. According to the Second Amendment in the Constitution, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” (https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/second_amendment) Obtaining a gun, gives one the sense of feeling safe and protected given any situation. No one knows when they may be “attacked” or in danger, and the protection they need from the government may not always be there to protect them. Every American must learn self-defense and use it when needed, they shouldn’t have to rely and anyone but themselves.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. has been in a hot debate over a tough issue for hundreds of years now. The subject of that debate is gun control laws. With mass murders and break-ins happening all over America it brings up two groups of people. One group believes taking away the guns will solve the problem. I believe, along with lots of other people, that taking away the guns will not solve the problem. We need to protect our Second Amendment, as well as ourselves, and stick to our guns.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Control: Pros And Cons

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gun control has been a long debated issue amongst people. I chose to research the pros and cons of laws already in place. Firearms are grouped into three different categories: Handguns, Rifles, and Shotguns. Under federal law it is illegal to be given, obtain, or move any firearm or ammunition for people who have been “convicted of or under indictment for a felony punishable by more than one year in prison, someone convicted of a misdemeanor punishable by more than two years in prison, a fugitive from justice, an unlawful user of any controlled substance, someone who has been ruled as mentally defective or has been committed to any mental institution, an illegal alien, someone dishonorably discharged from the military, someone who has renounced…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control in the United States has become a highly controversial topic over the years. There have been plenty of debates on the gun control laws and people have taken to being either pro gun control laws or anti gun control laws. One thing we can’t deny would be that gun control laws would keep us all safer and even save lives. Statistic show that more guns equals to more homicide cases. If more citizens have easy access to guns, they’re more likely to kill than if they didn’t have easy access to the guns. Public places like schools, restaurants, and churches are not acceptable places for people to be carrying guns; it puts the public in danger. It should be illegal.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The first mass shooting was in Austin, Texas in 1966 by Charles Whitman at the University of Texas. He snipped fourteen people and wounded thirty-two others in less than ninety minutes. Students used their weapons from their vehicles and helped police take him down. Democratic parties are scared to bring up the topic of gun control because they fear that they will lose votes to the people that do not want gun control. Gun laws are intended to limit the amount of guns in an area and lower crime rates, but people with mental problems do not follow those rules. They set their minds on killing people and that is what they do. If gun control became stricter, then there would still be gun violence because criminals would be armed making unarmed citizens easy targets. No one can stop them because they are set on killing no matter what. They do not have to suffer the consequences of killing the people they do because most of them kill themselves when they are about to get caught or after they finish what they planned to do.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays