Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Citizens United

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
510 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Citizens United
Citizens United Essay
Debates about the Citizens United case have been ripe throughout the entire country. In the case, the majority of the Supreme Court ruled that company broadcasts could not be limited. In addition, they ruled that there was no cap on company funding on candidates, but that there had to be a middleman of a superpac. Setting dangerous future implications, this decisions greatly undermines the future democracy of the country through condoning skewed political power based on wealth and by giving first amendment right to a company (Citizens 1). Setting a regulation to funnel the wealthy elite’s money into super PACs takes away power from the everyday individual and their right to have a government by the people for the people. Also, it perpetuates corruption due to the super PACs not being legally obligated to disclose their spending, which is known as “dark money”. This continues the cycle of corruption by decreasing transparency of a candidate, making the candidate and their interests less known to the public. Due to this, he public is unable to make informed decisions to better not only their own lives, but the entire country through their vote (Levy 1).
…show more content…
Actually, “the Fortune 100 companies alone had combined revenues of $13 trillion and profits of $605 billion during the last election cycle”(Pro 1). Through this money, the companies have the ability to push their agendas onto candidates, which creates politicians only focused on a select fews problems because they are worried about appeasing them to gain the necessary funding. In addition, this decision drastically puts back the time scales of democracy by more than a century, which is treatourous for the entire country (Pro

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Attorney Theodore Olsen, who argued on behalf of Citizens United, claimed that the FEC was violating Citizens United’s First Amendment rights by limiting the films distribution. One key argument made by Olsen is that the BCRA did not intend to prohibit this type of film. Olsen claimed that the film was indistinguishable from news media; however, Justice Souter cited numerous examples of the documentary bashing then Senator Clinton and suggested that the film was more like campaign advocacy. This is an important distinction—does it make a difference if the film…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Valeo and McConnell and Wisconsin Right To Life, independent expenditures mustn 't be touched by the government. Subsequently, corporate contributions and their requirements have also come under scrutiny by critics of the Citizens United ruling. This case deals solely, with independent expenditures as it upholds the previous rulings that corporations must disclose their contributions to candidates. It was written by Justice Kennedy during the Supreme Court 's hearing of Citizens United v. FEC, "Disclosure permits citizens and shareholders to react to the speech of corporate entities in a proper way." Donating to campaigns, therefore must be regulated in order to prevent corruption, but is still an effective way to communicate to voters and candidates. Most important, the verdict of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, upholds the ideal that corporations must be treated as…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Big Money: 2.5 Billion Dollars, One Suspicious Vehicle, and a Pimp- on the Trail of the Ultra-Rich Hijacking American Politics, author Kenneth P. Vogel writes on the newly less regulated, and arguably more corrupt relationship between the American political system and big money donors. In this response paper I will address the main questions in relation to the text. One, which Supreme Court decision allowed for the rise in “Big Money’s” influence over the American political system? Two, how did the Supreme Court decision addressed in question one change both the American political landscape and the fundraising techniques used by those involved in political fundraising? And third, how did the Republicans and Democrats each respond in 2012 to “Big Money” in the American political system. I will follow the answers to these questions with a later section in my paper devoted to a personal response to Vogel’s text, as well as connections between his text and broader topic discussed in our Interest Groups class lectures.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Citizens United v. FEC allowed for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they wanted in order to convince the public either to vote for or against a candidate. They are protected by the First Amendment, which allows for them to have unlimited spending. However, the Supreme Court argued that it is illegal for corporations or labor unions to give money directly to candidate. The Supreme Court argued that if corporations or labor unions give money directly to a candidate, it could lead to corruption. Ultimately, I agree with the Supreme Court decision that it is illegal for them to do this and agree that they can persuade the public through other methods. For instance, corporations and labor unions can persuade the public through ads…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super PACs are the way that the few rich people in America get to control the influences in an election. These people and corporations donate large sums of money to Super PACs in order to dominate the amount of money being given to candidates. According to a study done by the U.S. Public Interest Group, “93% of the itemized funds raised by Super PACs from individuals in 2011 came in contributions of at least $10,000” and came from 23 out of every 10 million people in America. CNN reported on this saying “more than half of this money coming from just 37 people who each gave $500,000 or more.” Also reporting on this study was Politico which said "Super PACs raised about $181 million in the last two years -- with roughly half of it coming from fewer than 200 super-rich people." Since the election process is all about equal voice for all, through Super PACs, the CU ruling is harming the election process.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As one can see, campaign finance reform has been around for a while, not that many people were really aware of it until the Citizens United v. FEC case of 2010. Citizens United was founded in 1988 by a Washington political consultant, Floyd Brown who received major funding from the Koch brothers, industrialist who own the secondly largest privately owned company in the US (Mayer, 2010). They gained fame by suing the Federal Election Commission (FEC), leading to a notorious Supreme Court case which eliminated some restrictions on how corporations can spend money in elections. Back in 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) was the main United States federal law that regulates political fundraising and spending. Its original focus was…

    • 280 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The main question is that since the lobbyists represent a big part of the public voice, which may have not been recognized if the lobbyists weren’t there, do we still restrict the lobbyists or do we still have democracy left in this country? The answer…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, most American politicians are “fundraisers first and legislators second,” which has numerous consequences (Sarbanes). Congressman John Sarbanes estimated that congressmen devote 30 to 70 percent of their time to fundraising -time that could be spent creating legislation and learning about policy issues (Lieu). Additionally, the unrestricted private campaign donations are undermining democracy, in a sense “buying the government,” while the people’s interests shift to the back seat. To reduce gridlock, we need our congress members time and energy devoted to legislation, and their votes dedicated to the people, not solely the Big Money minority. In accordance with the views of many grassroots leaders, I believe that we need a comprehensive overhaul of the election system. The first step is the reversal of Citizens United, a court case that led to the creation of super PAC’s when the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government cannot limit corporations (or unions, associations or individuals) from spending money to influence the outcome of elections (Liptak). The second step involves transferring power back to the people. As Lawrence Lessig, academic scholar and political activist, points out, “So long as elections cost money, we won’t end Congress’s dependence on its funders (Lessig).” Therefore, our second step must be to adopt a system of…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Limiting independent expenditures is limiting money spent by individuals and groups, such as 527’s and super PACs, for candidates and parties that the individuals and groups are not directly affiliated with. There are many viable arguments in favor of the proposal; one of the strongest arguments in favor is that the most affluent groups and people should not be the most influential groups and people. If there was no limiting of independent expenditures, the influence that wealthy individuals and groups have over elected officials would be potentially magnified. Thus, as long as there are restrictions on the amount of money that individuals and groups may expend in support of candidates and parties, the influence of the preponderance of the…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is said that the huge significance of money compromises America’s democracy. This is why spending limits have been introduced. In the aftermath of the crooked Watergate scandal, anxiety over campaign finance led to the passage of two major reform bills—the Revenue Act of 1971 and the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974—that…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    of the United States government and the unequal justice of the corporations that run the…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The arguments between the Anti-Federalists and Federalists led to the creation of a document that has stood the test of time and new governments have repeatedly modeled their governmental structure off of the Constitution. Despite the overwhelming majority of the Anti-Federalists’ concerns over many of the Constitution’s provisions being unfounded, their apprehensions regarding disproportionate amount of influence men of property could have on government officials have since become a scary reality, ironically due to their own insistence on implementing a Bill of Rights. Since the Supreme Court deemed that the United States government had no right to limit money spent on elections in Citizens United vs. Federal Election Commission, wealthy donors, including corporations, have contributed millions upon millions of dollars into elections at all different levels of…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If you look at our current candidates for the presidential elections for 2016, people like Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have millions of dollars donated to them so they can campaign for certain laws and goals. With the money received from supporters, these candidates are able to continue their campaign for presidency while other people like Rick Perry had to drop out because he had no more funds. To me, whoever has the most money and support from businesses are more likely to get government positions. Furthermore, if you look at the controversial candidate Donald Trump, I only think he has a high stand in the presidential race because he was already a powerful and rich businessman prior to his declaration in joining. Trump is a billionaire and his status in the business world as well as his connections propels him to have a better chance to become one of the finalists in the race, at least that is what I believe. If businesses did not play a factor in elections, campaigns would be much more modest and Trump would most likely not be in a favorable light to…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paper will discuss what interest groups are and the role that interest groups play in American politics and why it is important. Another thing that this paper will discuss is how interest groups have influenced American elections. American elections have been influenced with direct and indirect strategies to get a candidate elected. They have also been influenced wit the use of information. The direct strategies used where more in your face and out for everyone else to know about and where very effective. While the indirect strategies used may have been hidden and in the shadows they were also effective. The use of information was helpful to put things out into the world and it was also there to help the candidate that was being supported by the interest group gain popularity and/or publicity. Towards the end of the paper the role of interest groups and how they have influenced American elections should be understood.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States Constitution is one of the most significant documents in modern world history. Its official date of adoption was on the seventeenth of September in 1897. The Constitution itself represents the advent of democracy, justice and freedom in a once-was colony which thereafter gained its independence. It established three branches of government; the legislative branch, the judicial branch and the executive branch. Additionally, the Constitution outlined the relationship between the country’s citizens and the Federal government.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays