The Progressive Era Analysis

Women have fought for equality in a world that is mostly dominated by men. They weren’t allowed in political debates they were always seen as the ‘house wives’ and whenever they did take action it was allow halted by men .The title itself gives to me the idea that men special involved with traditional values and they didn’t want anything to be changed. While the women wanted to move forward and seek changes in their society. The author, Perry, gives us her critique on what she was able to find in women during the progressive era. She also gives four suggestion that historians should take when discussing the progressive era. In part one of her essay the author criticizes progressive era historians from the perspective of women. It seemed like it was very difficult to find any information about women during the progressive era. Which was
First she says that historians should discuss the meanings and consequences of women’s suffrage. If that was done then would have a clear understand of events took place and to have and understanding of what happened because of those events. Historians need to be more informative and discuss the meaning a consequences of women suffrage. According to the author historian’s mainly focus on the early victories and they emphasize the disappointments . I understand why historian would discuss those victors and downfalls, those are seen as the most important and feel that those are the ones that have to be shared. I do agree that there should have been focus women suffrage as a whole rather than certain events. Because it not giving the whole story can create confusion on what actually happened. Secondly she thinks that they should rethink the attention they pay to moral reforms movements. To According to the author the “almost every Progressive cause had its moral dimensions…”1 moral