Preview

The Problem Of Evil Essay

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Problem Of Evil Essay
The Problem of Evil Essay
1) Suffering can create philosophical problem for a religious believer because in the entire Christian view of the world, the Problem of Evil and Suffering is one of the biggest criticisms philosophers and ordinary people face, as they find it hard to prove this theory wrong while still proving that God exists. If god is all powerful, has created the universe and is totally responsible for it, and can do anything that is logically possible, then he could end evil and suffering. If god is all knowing, he must know how to stop evil and suffering. If god is all loving, he would wish to end evil and suffering as he would choose for his creation to live in the world of evil and suffering.
Natural evil raises the problem of why god created a universe capable of acting in such violent ways, moral evil demands an answer to the question why god created human beings who could choose evil, as well as good. These can be further subdivided into Physical evil and metaphysical evil.
Epicurus (342-270) posed this question-“Is god willing to prevent evil, and not able? Then he is impotent, Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then why is there evil? If he is neither able nor willing, then why call him god”.
In response to the whole problem, many people have written theodicies, criticisms and problems surrounding it all. One of the main explanations, or argument which helps prove that God doesn't exist due to the problem of evil and suffering is
Mackie's Inconsistent Triad, in which he brings God's powers and evil still existing into question.
Mackie (1955) stated "if God is Omnipotent and Omnibenevolent how can there be evil and suffering in the world"
, meaning one of gods powers isn't true and there is evil in the world, causing atheism to come into question, Swinburne claimed that the believer must have a satisfactory answer otherwise there is no reason why the atheist should share his faith, David Hume

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The explanation for why someone or something is evil can not be easily defined, as the answer may vary based on a person’s psychological thought process or intellectual reasoning. The justification of this paper is to discuss Peter Van Inwagen and his philosophical response to the argument from evil, as well as his free will defense theory for the answer to this complication. I will carefully evaluate the two standard objections to his solution and offer my personal opinion of rather or not he offers a successful resolution for this universal problem.…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He begins to ponder and tear at the origin of evil. He asks “where did it from”, “why is it still allowed? Bayle acknowledges that God is supposed to be wholly good and powerful. However, despites god’s power and goodness, god has allowed evil to run free. Bayle addresses in this essay the questions the ancient Greek philosopher Epicurus brought to light. Epicurus states that God is either “willing to remove evil and cannot; or he can and is unwilling; … or else he is both willing and able” (Bayle p 169). However, these options bring to light an idea that is not so comfortable about God. If he is willing to remove evil but can’t to address the problem of evil, then God is not all powerful. If he can and is unwilling, then he is not good, for whom that is good would want to put his children through the trials of evil? Bayle suggests that if God is willing and able to remove evil, then why does he not remove it? In the story Candide, Voltaire agrees with the Manichean view and shows it through his writing. There are several instances where a God of Good is present in Candide’s life, and then the God of Evil interferes…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P4: Evil is not due to God but to man’s misuse of the free will that God gave him (McCloskey & Hick, 332 &347).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    protocol paper 1

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Recall: In "The problem of evil," James Rachels and Stuart Rachels provider some important point: 1) Pain is not body’s warning system needed, because newborn babies did not deserve inexorable pain; 2) Even If we need evil to appreciate the good, but it is does not explain why there is such an extraordinary amount of evil in this world; 3) The doctrine of original sin was absurd. According to authors, it would be come to a conclusion that a newborn baby did deserve terrible disease. 4) The idea that Free Will Defense is in apparent contradiction to the natural evil in the world. 5) Based on the idea that a world without suffering would be void of the virtues necessary for good moral development. It does not explain the reason that God allowed the Holocaust or isolated cases of extreme cruelty to happen. 6) The theory of moral development does not explain the reason why animals suffering.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: James Rachels addresses the conflicts of evil in his book “Problems from Philosophy” by providing various forms of logical problems. The author points out the different possible explanations to why evil would exist. The first major idea Rachels makes is that perhaps pain is essential to caution people of danger. He goes on to suggest that this would not account for why some people are born with deadly diseases. Another idea he makes is that evil helps people appreciate the good in life. One would not be able to distinguish the good in life if evil did not exist. However, this does not explain why the world needs so much evil to exist, instead of letting a few bad things happen occasionally. The third idea the author makes questions why bad things happen to good people. Rachels suggests maybe those bad things that occur in life are…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kidder argues that the universality principle of suffering is wrong because as Farmer puts it “all suffering isn’t equal” (216). Catholicism, Judaism, and Islam all say that suffering on earth leads to reward in…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probably the most powerful reason against the existence of The Classical God of Theism (hereafter referred to as God) is evil and suffering in the world. The problem of evil is an ‘a posterori’ argument, established from experience based on empirical senses. It is also synthetic as evil and suffering can be seen around us daily. There are a number of possible reasons for the problem of evil and why it causes a problem for religious believers, making it an inductive argument also. In his book Philosophy of Religion John Hick defined evil and suffering as “physical pain, mental suffering and moral wickedness”…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our world is filled with corruption; this proves that there is no God if he cannot help us by preventing evil. The argument of evil basically states that God and evil cannot coincide. There are two types of evil; moral, which is carried out by humans through immoral actions that cause pain and suffering such as murder, rape and so forth. Natural evil is the second type which occurs through inevitable phenomenon’s such as natural disasters; hurricanes, tsunamis and diseases are a few (Sober, 120).…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A theodicy is a philosophical study, which attempts to satisfy the problem of the existence of evil and suffering alongside the existence of the God of Classical Theism, a God who is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. Augustine of Hippo (354-430 CE) tries to justify the righteousness of God; Augustine’s theodicy heavily refers and relates to key biblical passages. Therefore his theodicy is an attempt to solve the problem of suffering. Augustine uses the story of the Fall in Genesis 1:27 to argue that God intended for the world to be a perfect place but due to Adam and Eve committing the Original Sin they consequently bought evil into the world. Evil is therefore not from…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since evil does exist then God does not. Aquinas' analysis of Augustine's quote is that evil exists so can god. God is so good that he can produce good out of…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    That people knowingly and willingly commit evil acts. For non-believers the problem of evil presents a social, ethical and moral problem. If we accept that evil is a part of the human condition, and arises out of greed and self, to what extent should we value another person who has the capacity for such extreme evils. It becomes a large concern for atheists because how do they know others will not act out on them in an evil manor. If there is no God and our actions in this life have no consequence, then what need is there to act good and avoid evil. If people believe that there actions have no consequence they may feel free to roam around doing whatever they please, disregarding others well being. The problem for atheists is that without religion the problem of evil would be far worse. Religion plays an important role in controlling society and controlling our actions. For the non-believer trying to distinguish between evil and good is difficult if a list of rules have not been imposed by your religion. But even for none-believers there is a still a set of laws that deter them from committing evil acts. The Judicial system imposes lengthy prison time for what the country deems as an evil act. But even the judicial system takes a lot of its laws from religion. If religion did not exist society would not be as morally good as it is now, the judicial system that is a creation of a developed society would not be the same, our perception of evil and good would also be different. Earlier we explained that Hobbes thought we were all selfish creatures, only trying to better our position.x Without religion what would stop are evil impulses from being the dominant choice. Religion is not just as Marx said, “the opium of the masses”,xi but it is also the suppression of the masses. it commands people to act in a good way for fear of eternal damnation. The…

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As we debate the existence of God, we must acknowledge that of which is not pleasant nor false, the persistence of evil in our modern day world and the hope for an answer to all the pain and suffering of mankind, a modern day example of an attempt to explain that of which we seek for, is that of Bruce Russell’s “The Problem of Evil”. In this paper i will analyze and delve in to the key arguments made by Bruce Russell to prove his theory of the non-existence of God. “The Problem of Evil” is today known as the best known argument towards God and his absence in the moral world. This notion of God and his absence, is a modern day problem for a greater part of the worlds “ordinary people” and even for the most learned philosophers, who are all puzzled as to how God in all his wisdom and all-being would sit by and permit all the evil in the world.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Problem Of Evil Analysis

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Problem of Evil concerns three premises, God is all-powerful, God is all-good, and evil exist. If God is omnipotent; he would…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics